Neoplasms

Respiratory Tract (Lung and Bronchial) Diseases

All Conditions

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Lung Neoplasms

Carcinoma

Respiratory Tract Neoplasms

Thoracic Neoplasms

Lung Diseases

Respiratory Tract Diseases

Carcinoma, Bronchogenic

Bronchial Neoplasms

Antineoplastic Agents

All Drugs and Chemicals

Pembrolizumab

Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Participants received 200 mg of canakinumab once every 3 weeks for a maximum duration of 6 weeks prior to surgery

Participants received 200 mg of canakinumab in combination with 200 mg of pembrolizumab once every 3 weeks for a maximum duration of 6 weeks prior to surgery

Participants received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for a maximum duration of 6 weeks prior to surgery

200 mg of canakinumab administered via subcutaneous injections once every 3 weeks for a maximum duration of 6 weeks

Canakinumab

200 mg of pembrolizumab administered via infusion once every 3 weeks for a maximum duration of 6 weeks

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the major pathological response (MPR) rate of canakinumab given as a neoadjuvant treatment, either as single agent or in combination with pembrolizumab, in addition to evaluate the MPR of pembrolizumab as a single agent and the dynamic of the tumor microenvironment changes on treatment.

This was a randomized, phase II, open-label study evaluating canakinumab, an anti-IL-1β monoclonal antibody, or pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody designed to block the PD-1 receptor, as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant therapy. The study population included adult subjects with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) planned for surgery in approximately 4-6 weeks. Subjects were treated for a maximum duration of 6 weeks (2 cycles) until surgery, progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation from the study treatment for any other reason.

Subjects were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of the 3 treatment arms (canakinumab alone or canakinumab in combination with pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone). Surgery was performed between 4 to 6 weeks after the first dose of study treatment.

All randomized subjects were followed for safety for up to 130 days following the last dose of study treatment (safety follow-up period).

This Study Will Evaluate the Effect of Canakinumab or Pembrolizumab Given as Monotherapy or in Combination as Neo-adjuvant Treatment for Subjects With Early Stages NSCLC.

A Randomized, Open-label, Phase II Study of Canakinumab or Pembrolizumab as Monotherapy or in Combination as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Subjects With Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (CANOPY-N)

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent expert panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data is currently available according to the process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

MPR was defined as the percentage of participants with major pathological response (defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor cells on surgical samples). Any participant who had \>10% residual viable cancer cells, or started new antineoplastic therapy prior to surgery, or did not have the surgery performed, or had the surgery performed but with unevaluable MPR result, was considered as a non-responder.

MPR was assessed at the time of surgery in all subjects randomized to canakinumab monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab based on central review.

Canakinumab ADA prevalence at baseline was calculated as the percentage of participants who had a canakinumab ADA positive result at baseline

Canakinumab ADA incidence on treatment was calculated as the percentage of participants who were canakinumab treatment-induced ADA positive (post-baseline ADA positive with ADA-negative sample at baseline) and canakinumab treatment-boosted ADA positive (post-baseline ADA positive with titer that is at least the fold titer change greater than the ADA-positive baseline titer)

Pembrolizumab ADA prevalence at baseline was calculated as the percentage of participants who had a pembrolizumab ADA positive result at baseline

Pembrolizumab ADA incidence on treatment was calculated as the percentage of participants who were pembrolizumab treatment-induced ADA positive (post-baseline ADA positive with ADA-negative sample at baseline) and pembrolizumab treatment-boosted ADA positive (post-baseline ADA positive with titer that is at least the fold titer change greater than the ADA-positive baseline titer)

ORR is defined as the percentage of subjects with confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as per local investigator's assessment by RECIST 1.1.

CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.

PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters

Canakinumab serum concentrations were determined at the specified time points.

Pembrolizumab serum concentrations were determined at the specified time points.

Surgical feasibility rate was defined as the percentage of subjects who underwent surgery following study treatment.

MPR was defined as the percentage of participants with major pathological response (defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor cells on surgical samples). Any participant who had \>10% residual viable cancer cells, or started new antineoplastic therapy prior to surgery, or did not have the surgery performed, or had the surgery performed but with unevaluable MPR result, was considered as a non-responder.

MPR was assessed at the time of surgery in all subjects randomized to pembrolizumab monotherapy arm based on central review.

MPR was defined as the percentage of participants with ≤10% residual viable tumor cells on surgical samples. MPR was assessed at the time of surgery based on central review. The difference in MPR rate between the canakinumab plus pembrolizumab arm and the pembrolizumab arm based on central review along with the Chang and Zhang confidence interval was assessed.

MPR was defined as the percentage of participants with major pathological response (defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor cells on surgical samples). Any participant who had \>10% residual viable cancer cells, or started new antineoplastic therapy prior to surgery, or did not have the surgery performed, or had the surgery performed but with unevaluable MPR result, was considered as a non-responder.

MPR was assessed at the time of surgery in all subjects based on local review.

MPR was defined as the percentage of participants with major pathological response (defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor cells on surgical samples). Any participant who had \>10% residual viable cancer cells, or started new antineoplastic therapy prior to surgery, or did not have the surgery performed, or had the surgery performed but with unevaluable MPR result, was considered as a non-responder.

MPR rate was analyzed by the biomarker subgroups at baseline. Biomarkers included PD-L1, CD8, hs-CRP and hs-IL-6.

Any sign or symptom that occurs during the study treatment plus the 130 days post treatment

Canakinumab Monotherapy

Canakinumab + Pembrolizumab

Pembrolizumab Monotherapy

Total

Age, Continuous

Sex: Female, Male

Race/Ethnicity, Customized

Study director

All subjects who were randomized to canakinumab monotherapy or canakinumab in combination with pembrolizumab

Major Pathological Response (MPR) Rate at the Time of Surgery in Subjects Randomized to Canakinumab Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab Based on Central Review

All subjects randomized to canakinumab monotherapy or canakinumab in combination with pembrolizumab who received at least one dose of canakinumab.

Canakinumab Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Prevalence

Canakinumab ADA Incidence

All subjects randomized to canakinumab in combination with pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab.

Pembrolizumab ADA Prevalence

Pembrolizumab ADA Incidence

FAS including all subjects to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization.

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Local Investigator Assessment Using RECIST v1.1

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

All participants who received at least one dose of canakinumab with at least one evaluable pharmacokinetic (PK) sample. Number analyzed corresponds to the number of participants with an evaluable PK sample at the specified time point

Serum Canakinumab Concentration

Cycle 1 predose

Cyle 1 0.5 hours post dose

Cycle 2 predose

All participants who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab with at least one evaluable PK sample. Number analyzed corresponds to the number of participants with an evaluable PK sample at the specified time point

Serum Pembrolizumab Concentration

Surgical Feasibility Rate

All subjects who were randomized to pembrolizumab monotherapy arm

Major Pathological Response (MPR) Rate at the Time of Surgery in Subjects Randomized to Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Based on Central Review

All subjects who were randomized to canakinumab in combination with pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy arms

Difference in Major Pathological Response (MPR) Rate Between the Canakinumab Plus Pembrolizumab Arm and the Pembrolizumab Arm Based on Central Review

Major Pathological Response (MPR) Rate at the Time of Surgery in All Subjects Based on Local Review

PD-L1: <1%

PD-L1: 1-49%

PD-L1: >=50%

hs-CRP: <2mg/L

hs-CRP: >=2mg/L

hs-IL-6: <Q1 (2.52 mg/L)

hs-IL-6: >=Q1 (2.52 pg/mL) to <Q2 (5.36 pg/mL)

hs-IL-6: >=Q2 (5.36 pg/mL) to <Q3 (12.03 pg/mL)

hs-IL-6: >=Q3 (12.03 pg/mL)

CD8: <3%

CD8: >=3%

All subjects to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis for each category

Major Pathological Response (MPR) Rate Based on the Levels of Biomarkers

Treatment Period

Safety Follow-up Period

Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Rare Diseases

Melanoma

Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroectodermal Tumors

Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive

Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue

Nevus, Pigmented

Nevus

Nevi and Melanomas

Skin Neoplasms

Skin Diseases

Neuroendocrine Tumor

Neuroepithelioma

Immunomodulating Agents

Spartalizumab

Participnats randomized to receive LAG525 at a dosage of 600 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks, in combination with PDR001 at a dosage of 400 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks

Participants randomized to receive INC280 orally at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily, in combination with PDR001 intravenously at a dosage of 400 mg every 4 weeks

Participants randomized to receive to receive ACZ885 at a dosage of 300 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks, in combination with PDR001 at a dosage of 400 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks

Participants randomized to receive LEE011 orally at a dosage of 600 mg once daily on Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, in combination with PDR001 intravenously at a dosage of 400 mg every 4 weeks

LAG-3 positive participants received LAG525 at a dosage of 600 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks, in combination with PDR001 at a dosage of 400 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks

400 mg of PDR001 administered every 4 weeks intravenously

PDR001

600 mg of LAG525 administered every 4 weeks intravenously

LAG525

400 mg of INC280 administered twice daily orally

INC280

200 mg of ACZ885 administered every 4 weeks subcutaneosuly

ACZ885

600 mg of LEE011 orally taken once daily on Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle

LEE011

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of novel spartalizumab (PDR001) combinations in previously treated unresectable or metastatic melanoma

This study was a randomized, open-label, two-part, multi-center, open platform phase II study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-PD-1 antibody PDR001 in combination with novel agents for previously treated unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Additionally, a non-randomized single-arm was added based on interim analysis findings to assess the efficacy and safety of PDR001 in combination with LAG525 in subjects with previously treated unresectable or metastatic LAG-3 positive melanoma.

The study consisted of two parts: the selection part and the expansion part, which were applicable to both the randomized and non-randomized sections. In the randomized section, participants were randomized to one of four combination arms available for enrollment:

* Arm 1: LAG525 600 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 4 weeks (Q4W) and PDR001 400 mg i.v. Q4W.
* Arm 2: INC280 400 mg orally (p.o.) twice daily (BID) and PDR001 400 mg i.v. Q4W.
* Arm 3: ACZ885 300 mg subcutaneously (s.c.) every 4 weeks (Q4W) and PDR001 400 mg i.v. Q4W.
* Arm 4: LEE011 600 mg p.o. once daily (QD) on Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle and PDR001 400 mg i.v. Q4W.

At each interim analysis, the following determinations were made: (1) which arm met the pre-specified efficacy criteria and expanded to the expansion part, (2) which arms continued enrollment in selection part (up to 45 subjects), and (3) which arms were discontinued due to futility, considering efficacy, safety, and biomarker data. The expansion phase included enrollment of subjects only in the combination arms that met the pre-specified criteria in selection part.

In the non-randomized section, a single combination arm was opened for enrollment in selection part:

• Arm 1A: LAG525 600 mg i.v. Q4W and PDR001 400 mg i.v. Q4W, assessed in a population selected based on the LAG-3 status of their tumor.

Arm 1A would be eligible for enrollment in expansion part only if it met the pre-specified criterion for this arm.

Participants received the study treatment corresponding to their assigned arm on a 28-day cycle basis until disease progression, as determined by local assessment using RECIST v1.1 criteria, or until certain events occurred, such as unacceptable toxicity, initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, withdrawal of consent, investigator's decision, loss to follow-up, death, or termination of the study by the sponsor. Following discontinuation of the study treatment, all subjects were monitored for safety evaluations for up to 150 days after their last dose of the study treatment.

After approval of protocol amendment 5 (26Jun2020), a non-randomized single arm was added

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Novel Spartalizumab Combinations in Patients With Previously Treated Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma

A Randomized, Open-label, Phase II Open Platform Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Novel Spartalizumab (PDR001) Combinations in Previously Treated Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma

ORR defined as the percentage of patients with a best overall response of either confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as per local review by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) and assessed by computed tomography (CT)/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

CR:Disappearance of all non-nodal target and non-target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

DOR defined as the time from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression (as per local review by RECIST v1.1 and assessed by CT/MRI) or death due to any cause. Subjects continuing without progression or death due to underlying cancer were censored at the date of their last adequate tumor assessment.

CR:Disappearance of all non-nodal target and non-target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization (or date of first dose of study treatment in non-randomized part) to date of death due to any cause. The OS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the medians and 95% confidence intervals of the medians were presented.

PFS was defined as the time between the date of randomization (or date of first dose of study treatment in non-randomized section) to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression (as per local review by RECIST v1.1 and assessed by CT/MRI) or death due to any cause. If a subject had not had an event before leaving study or initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy, PFS was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. The PFS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, medians and 95% confidence interval of the medians were presented.

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of CR, PR or stable disease (SD) (as per local review by RECIST v1.1 and assessed by CT/MRI).

CR:Disappearance of all non-nodal target and non-target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.

Percentage of participants who had a PDR001 ADA positive result at baseline.

Percentage of participants who had a LAG525 ADA positive result at baseline. Only applicable for participants enrolled in Arm 1 and Arm 1A.

Percentage of participants who had an ACZ885 ADA positive result at baseline. Only applicable for subjects enrolled in Arm 3.

Percentage of participants who tested positive for treatment-induced ADA for PDR001 (subjects with ADA-negative sample at baseline with at least one post-baseline ADA positive sample) as well as treatment-boosted ADA for PDR001 (subjects with baseline positive ADA titre that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher-level following treatment).

Percentage of participants who tested positive for treatment-induced ADA for LAG525 (subjects with ADA-negative sample at baseline with at least one post-baseline ADA positive sample) as well as treatment-boosted ADA for LAG525 (subjects with baseline positive ADA titre that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher-level following treatment). Only applicable for subjects enrolled in Arm 1 and Arm 1A.

Percentage of participants who tested positive for treatment-induced ADA for ACZ885 (subjects with ADA-negative sample at baseline with at least one post-baseline ADA positive sample) as well as treatment-boosted ADA for ACZ885 (subjects with baseline positive ADA titre that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher-level following treatment). Only applicable for subjects enrolled in Arm 3.

Biomarker parameters included: 1) number of tumor infiltrating T cells (TIL), 2) activation level of TIL, and 3) changes in immune response gene expression signatures. For the number of TILs, an increase in tumoral CD8+ cell numbers compared to baseline was considered favorable. The activation level of TIL was assessed by the percentage of tumoral CD8+ cells expressing GzmB (a marker for cytotoxic activity) or Ki67 (a marker for cell proliferation), where an increase in either GZMB+/CD8+ or KI67+/CD8+ post-baseline was considered favorable. Changes in immune response gene expression signatures were evaluated by the levels in T-cell inflamed signature (TIS), where an increase from baseline was considered favorable.

To be categorized as having a pFBP, a subject must meet the favorable criteria for at least two of the three biomarker parameters. The percentage of participants with pFBP was assessed.

Any sign or symptom that occurs during the conduct of the trial and safety follow-up. Deaths in the post treatment survival follow-up are not considered AEs. The total number at risk in the post treatment survival includes patients that entered the post treatment survival follow-up period. Safety analyses were performed in the safety set, including all participants who received at least one dose of treatment

AEs collected during on-treatment period (up to 30 days post-treatment)

Arm 1: LAG525 + PDR001 (Randomized Part)- On-treatment Period

AEs collected during extended safety follow-up period (from day 31 post-treatment up to 150 days post last dose of PDR001 \[if \>30 days post-treatment\])

Arm 1: LAG525 + PDR001 (Randomized Part)- Extended Safety Follow-up

Deaths collected in the post- treatment survival follow-up period (starting from day 151 post- treatment). No AEs were collected during this period

Arm 1: LAG525 + PDR001 (Randomized Part)- Post-treatment Survival Follow-up

Arm 2: INC280+PDR001 (Randomized Part)- On-treatment Period

Arm 2: INC280+PDR001 (Randomized Part) - Extended Safety Follow-up

Arm 2: INC280+PDR001 (Randomized Part)- Post-treatment Survival Follow-up

Arm 3: ACZ885 + PDR001 (Randomized Part)- On-treatment Period

Arm 3: ACZ885 + PDR001 (Randomized Part)- Extended Safety Follow-up

Arm 3: ACZ885 + PDR001 (Randomized Part)- Post-treatment Survival Follow-up

Arm 4: LEE011 + PDR001 (Randomized Part)- On-treatment Period

Arm 4: LEE011 + PDR001 (Randomized Part)- Extended Safety Follow-up

Arm 4: LEE011 + PDR001 (Randomized Part)- Post-treatment Survival Follow-up

Arm 1A: LAG525 + PDR001 (Non-randomized Part)- On-treatment Period

Arm 1A: LAG525 + PDR001 (Non-randomized Part)- Extended Safety Follow-up

Arm 1A: LAG525 + PDR001 (Non-randomized Part)- Post-treatment Survival Follow-up

Participants randomized to receive LAG525 at a dosage of 600 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks, in combination with PDR001 at a dosage of 400 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks

Arm 1: LAG525 + PDR001 (Randomized Section)

Participants randomized to receive INC280 orally at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily, in combination with PDR001 at a dosage of 400 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks

Arm 2: INC280+PDR001 (Randomized Section)

Participants randomized to receive ACZ885 at a dosage of 300 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks, in combination with PDR001 at a dosage of 400 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks

Arm 3: ACZ885 + PDR001 (Randomized Section)

Participants randomized to receive LEE011 orally at a dosage of 600 mg once daily on Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, in combination with PDR001 at a dosage of 400 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks

Arm 4: LEE011 + PDR001 (Randomized Section)

Arm 1A: LAG525 + PDR001 (Non-randomized Section)

Age, Categorical

Race (NIH/OMB)

Randomized section: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization.

Non-randomized section: All participants who received at least one dose of study treatment

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Randomized section: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization for whom best overall response was complete response or partial response.

Non-randomized section: All participants who received at least one dose of study treatment for whom best overall response was complete response or partial response

Duration of Response (DOR)

Overall Survival (OS)

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

Randomized section: Participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization with a determinant baseline immunogenicity sample for PDR001.

Non-randomized section: Participants who received at least one dose of treatment with a determinant baseline immunogenicity sample for PDR001.

Percentage of Participants With PDR001 Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Positive Result at Baseline

Randomized section: Participants randomized to Arm 1 with a determinant baseline immunogenicity sample for LAG525.

Non-randomized section: Participants who received at least one dose of treatment with a determinant baseline immunogenicity sample for LAG525.

Percentage of Participants With LAG525 Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Positive Result at Baseline

Participants randomized to Arm 3 with a determinant baseline immunogenicity sample for ACZ885.

Percentage of Participants With ACZ885 Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Positive Result at Baseline

Randomized section: Participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization with a determinant baseline immunogenicity sample and at least one determinant post-baseline immunogenicity sample.

Non-randomized section: Participants who received at least one dose of study treatment with a determinant baseline immunogenicity sample and at least one determinant post-baseline immunogenicity sample.

Percentage of Participants Who Were Treatment-induced ADA Positive and Treatment-boosted ADA Positive for PDR001

Randomized section: Participants randomized to Arm 1 with a determinant baseline immunogenicity sample and at least one determinant post-baseline immunogenicity sample.

Non-randomized section: Participants who received at least one dose of study treatment with a determinant baseline immunogenicity sample and at least one determinant post-baseline immunogenicity sample.

Percentage of Participants Who Were Treatment-induced ADA Positive and Treatment-boosted ADA Positive for LAG525

Participants randomized to Arm 3 with a determinant baseline immunogenicity sample and at least one determinant post-baseline immunogenicity sample.

Percentage of Participants Who Were Treatment-induced ADA Positive and Treatment-boosted ADA Positive for ACZ885

Participants who received at least one dose of treatment with an evaluable baseline tumor biopsy sample and at least one evaluable post-baseline tumor biopsy sample with evaluable results for the three biomarker parameters.

Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Biomarker Profile (pFBP)

Pre-treatment deaths

On-treatment deaths

Extended safety follow-up deaths

Post-treatment survival follow-up deaths

All deaths

Pre-treatment: deaths collected from day of patient's informed consent to the day before the first administration of study treatment.

On-treatment: deaths collected from start of treatment to 30 days after last dose of study treatment.

Extended safety follow-up: deaths collected from 31 days after last dose of study treatment up to 150 days after last dose of PDR001 (if this timepoint was later than 30 days after last dose of study treatment) Post-treatment survival follow-up: deaths collected from day 151 post-last dose of PDR001 or 31 days after last dose of study treatment (whichever occurred last) up to end of study.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
This Study Will Evaluate the Effect of Canakinumab or Pembrolizumab Given as Monotherapy or in Combination as Neo-adjuvant Treatment for Subjects With Early Stages NSCLC.	NCT03968419	Non-small Cell ...	Canakinumab Pembrolizumab	18 Years -	Novartis
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Novel Spartalizumab Combinations in Patients With Previously Treated Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma	NCT03484923	Melanoma	PDR001 LAG525 INC280 ACZ885 LEE011	18 Years -	Novartis
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Novel Spartalizumab Combinations in Patients With Previously Treated Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma	NCT03484923	Melanoma	PDR001 LAG525 INC280 ACZ885 LEE011	18 Years -	Novartis
Phase III Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Combination With Docetaxel in Adult Subjects With Non-small Cell Lung Cancers as a Second or Third Line Therapy	NCT03626545	Non-Small-Cell ...	Canakinumab Docetaxel Placebo	18 Years -	Novartis
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab Plus Platinum-based Doublet Chemotherapy With or Without Canakinumab in Previously Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-squamous and Squamous NSCLC Subjects	NCT03631199	Non-small Cell ...	canakinumab canakinumab mat... pembrolizumab carboplatin cisplatin paclitaxel nab-paclitaxel pemetrexed	18 Years -	Novartis
Phase III Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Combination With Docetaxel in Adult Subjects With Non-small Cell Lung Cancers as a Second or Third Line Therapy	NCT03626545	Non-Small-Cell ...	Canakinumab Docetaxel Placebo	18 Years -	Novartis

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for acz885

Every month we try and update this database with for acz885 cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for acz885

Every month we try and update this database with for acz885 cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them. We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Every month we try and update this database with for acz885 cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.