Neoplasms

Respiratory Tract (Lung and Bronchial) Diseases

All Conditions

Blood and Lymph Conditions

Immune System Diseases

Rare Diseases

Lung Neoplasms

Carcinoma

Lymphoma

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Respiratory Tract Neoplasms

Thoracic Neoplasms

Lung Diseases

Respiratory Tract Diseases

Carcinoma, Bronchogenic

Bronchial Neoplasms

Lymphosarcoma

Antineoplastic Agents

All Drugs and Chemicals

Carboplatin

Pemetrexed

Cisplatin

Crizotinib

crizotinib 250mg orally continuous twice daily dosing

treatment

pemetrexed 500mg/m2 IV day 1 plus cisplatin 75mg/m2 IV day 1 every 21 days OR pemetrexed 500mg/m2 IV day 1 plus carboplatin AUC 5 or 6 day 1 every 21 days investigator's choice

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

This study will evaluate the anti-cancer effects of crizotinib when compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with ALK positive lung cancer.

A Clinical Trial Testing The Efficacy Of Crizotinib Versus Standard Chemotherapy Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin Or Carboplatin In Patients With ALK Positive Non Squamous Cancer Of The Lung

Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Crizotinib Versus Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Or Pemetrexed/Carboplatin In Previously Untreated Patients With Non-squamous Carcinoma Of The Lung Harboring A Translocation Or Inversion Event Involving The Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (Alk) Gene Locus.

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization in study until the date of first documented objective tumor progression (according to RECIST v1.1 as determined by IRR) or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. PFS (in months) was calculated as (first event date - randomization date +1)/30.44. Objective progression was defined as a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 millimeter (mm) or clear progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new clear lesions.

OS (in months) was defined as the duration from start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS = (date of death minus the date of randomization of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.4. For participants who were alive, overall survival was censored on last date the participants were known to be alive.

Overall survival probability at Month 12 and 18 was defined as the probability of overall survival at 12 and 18 months respectively, where the OS was defined as the duration from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. The survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

ORR was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1 determined by IRR. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis \<10 mm). No new lesions and disappearance of all non-target lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 30% decrease taking as reference the baseline sum of lesion dimensions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No clear progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.

DR: time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first as per RECIST v1.1 determined by IRR. CR: complete disappearance of all target and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis \<10 mm). No new lesions, disappearance of all non-target lesions. PR: \>=30% decrease taking as reference the baseline sum of lesion dimensions. Short axis was used in sum for target nodes, while longest diameter was used in sum for all or target lesions. No clear progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. c) PD: 20 % increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or clear progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new clear lesions.

TTR was defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) according to RECIST v1.1 determined by IRR. CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis \<10 mm). No new lesions and disappearance of all non-target lesions. PR: \>=30% decrease taking as reference the baseline sum of lesion dimensions. Short axis was used in sum for target nodes, while longest diameter was used in sum for all or target lesions. No clear progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.

Disease control rate at week 12 is defined as the percent of participants with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) at week 12 according to RECIST v1.1 determined by IRR. The best response of SD would be assigned if SD criteria was met at least once after randomization at a minimum interval of 6 weeks. CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis \<10 mm). No new lesions and disappearance of all non-target lesions. PR: \>=30% decrease taking as reference the baseline sum of lesion dimensions. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters. Short axis was used in sum for target nodes, while longest diameter was used in sum for all or target lesions. No clear progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.

TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression according to RECIST v1.1 determined by IRR. Objective tumor progression was defined as 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or clear progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new clear lesions. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. TTP (in months) was calculated as (first event date - randomization date +1)/30.44.

IC-TTP was defined similarly to TTP, but only considering intracranial disease (excluding extracranial disease) and the progression was determined based on either new brain metastases or progression of existing brain metastases. TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression according to RECIST v1.1 determined by IRR. Objective tumor progression was defined as 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or clear progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new clear lesions.

EC-TTP was defined similarly to TTP, but only considering extracranial disease (excluding intracranial disease) and the progression was determined based on either new extracranial lesions or progression of existing extracranial lesions. TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression according to RECIST v1.1 determined by IRR. Objective tumor progression was defined as 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or clear progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new clear lesions.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.

Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE was assessed according to maximum severity grading based on National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Grade 1 =mild; Grade 2 =moderate; within normal limits, Grade 3 =severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 =life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5 =death.

Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration on Day 1 of Cycle 2 onwards. PF-06260182 is the metabolite of Crizotinib.

The Response Genetics, Inc. Echinoderm Microtubule Associated Protein Like 4 (EML4) ALK reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR) gene fusion test was used for the analysis of tissue samples for the ALK gene fusion variants (either no rearrangement, or 1 of 9 results reflecting 8 specific rearrangements \[V1, V2, V3a, V3b,V3a/b, V4, V5a, V6, V7\]). Percentage of participants who tested positive for ALK gene fusion variants were reported in this outcome measure.

The Response Genetics, Inc. EML4 ALK reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR) gene fusion test was used for the analysis of tissue samples for the ALK gene fusion variants (either no rearrangement, or 1 of 9 results reflecting 8 specific rearrangements \[V1, V2, V3a, V3b,V3a/b, V4, V5a, V6, V7\]). Percentage of participants with confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 determined by IRR, by type of ALK gene fusion variant were reported in this outcome measure. CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis \<10 mm). No new lesions and disappearance of all non-target lesions. PR: \>=30% decrease decrease taking as reference the baseline sum of lesion dimensions. Short axis was used in sum for target nodes, while longest diameter was used in sum for all or target lesions. No clear progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.

TTD in pain in chest, dyspnea, or cough from the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-LC13) was a composite endpoint defined as the time from randomization to the earliest time the participant's scale scores showed a 10 point or greater increase after baseline in any of the 3 symptoms. For those who had not shown deterioration, the data was censored at the last date when the participants completed an assessment (QLQ-LC13) for pain, dyspnea, or cough or at last visit date prior to crossover for participants randomized to chemotherapy who subsequently crossed over to crizotinib. A 10-point or higher change in the score was perceived by participants as clinically significant. The transformed score of pain, dyspnea, and cough symptom scales of EORTC QLQ-LC13 (European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer) range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

EORTC QLQ-C30: included 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), global health status/global quality of life scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), 6 single items that assess the additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhea) and financial difficulties. All scales and single-item measures range from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL (better participant state), and for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptoms/problems (worse participant state).

QLQ-LC13 consists of 1 multi-item scale and 9 single items that assess the specific symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site-specific pain), side effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy, and alopecia), and pain medication use of patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy. All multi-item scales and single-item measures range from 0 to 100, where higher score indicates greater degree of symptom severity.

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. VAS component: participants rated their current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health.

Healthcare resource utilization was to be evaluated using the assessment of the following: date and duration of index admission, duration of hospitalization and date of discharge.

Anemia(grade\[g\]1:Less than\[\<\] Lower limit of normal\[LLN\] to 10gram per\[/\] deciliter\[g/dL\],g2:\<10 to 8g/dL,g3:\<8g/dL,g4:lifethreatening);platelet (g1:\<LLN to 75\*10\^3/millimeter\[mm\]\^3,g2:\<75\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 50\*10\^3/mm\^3,g3:\<50\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 25\*10\^3/mm\^3,g4:\<25\*10\^3/mm\^3);lymphopenia(g1:\<LLN to 8\*10\^2/mm\^3,g2:\<8\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3,g3:\<5\*10\^2 to 2\*10\^2/mm\^3,g4:\<2\*10\^2/mm\^3);neutrophil (Absolute)(g1:\<LLN to 15\*10\^2/mm\^3,g2:\<15\*10\^2 to 10\*10\^2/mm\^3,g3:\<10\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3,g4:\<5\*10\^2/mm\^3);white blood cell count(g1:\<LLN to 3\*10\^3/mm\^3,g2:\<3\*10\^3 to 2\*10\^3/mm\^3,g3:\<2\*10\^3 to 1\*10\^3/mm\^3,g4:\<1\*10\^3/mm\^3);hemoglobin(g1:increase in hemoglobin level\>0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN,g2:increase in hemoglobin level\>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN,g3:increase in hemoglobin level\>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN). Only categories with atleast 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.

ALT/AST (Grade\[g\]1:\>ULN-3\*ULN,g2:\>3-5\*ULN,g3:\>5-20\*ULN,g4:\>20\*ULN);Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:\>ULN-2.5\*ULN,g2:\>2.5-5\*ULN,g3:\>5-20\*ULN,g4:\>20\*ULN);Creatinine (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN,g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN,g3:\>3-6\*ULN,g4:\>6\*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:\>ULN-160,g2:\>160-250,g3:\>250-500,g4:\>500mg/dL);bilirubin(total) (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN,g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN,g3:\>3-10\*ULN,g4:\>10\*ULN);hypoglycaemia (g1:\<LLN-55,g2:\<55-40,g3:\<40-30,g4:\<30mg/dL);hyperkalemia (g1:\>ULN-5.5,g2:\>5.5-6,g3:\>6-7,g4:\>7mmol/L);hypokalemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<LLN-3,g3:\<3-2.5,g4:\<2.5mmol/L);hypermagnesemia (g1:\>ULN-3,g3:\>3-8,g4:\>8mg/dL);hypocalcemia (g1:\<LLN-8,g2:\<8-7,g3:\<7-6,g4:\<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:\>ULN-11.5,g2:\>11.5-12.5,g3:\>12.5-13.5,g4:\>13.5mg/dL);hypomagnesemia (g1:\<LLN-1.2,g2:\<1.2-0.9,g3:\<0.9-0.7,g4:\<0.7mg/dL);hyponatremia (g1:\<LLN-130,g3:\<130-120,g4:\<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<3-2,g3:\<2,g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:\<LLN-2.5,g2:\<2.5-2,g3:\<2-1,g4:\<1mg/dL). Participant\>=1 abnormality given.

Pfizer

The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Crizotinib 250 mg capsule, orally twice daily was administered in treatment cycle of 21 days. Participants could continue crizotinib treatment beyond the time of RECIST v1.1 defined PD, as determined by IRR, at the discretion of the investigator if the participant was perceived to be experiencing clinical benefit.

Standard doses of chemotherapy (pemetrexed/cisplatin or pemetrexed/carboplatin) were administered intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. Pemetrexed 500 mg per meter square (m)\^2 IV infusion according to standard of care was administered over 10 min; either cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered approximately 30 min after the end of the pemetrexed infusion or carboplatin was administered at a dose calculated to produce an AUC of 5 or 6 mg\*min/mL, approximately 30 min after end of pemetrexed infusion.

Chemotherapy

Total

Age, Continuous

Sex: Female, Male

The Full Analysis (FA) population included all participants who were randomized with study treatment assignment designated according to the initial randomization.

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

The FA population included all participants who were randomized with study treatment assignment designated according to the initial randomization.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on IRR

Overall Survival (OS)

Month 12

Month 18

Overall Survival Probability at Month 12 and 18

If the PFS endpoint was significant, ORR was to be considered significant if the 2-sided p-value from Pearson chi-square test was (less than or equal to)\<= 0.0494.

Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by IRR

The FA population included all participants who were randomized with study treatment assignment designated according to the initial randomization. Here Overall number of participants analyzed (N) signifies participants with objective tumor response and were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Duration of Response (DR) Based on IRR

The FA population included all participants who were randomized with study treatment assignment designated according to the initial randomization. Here N signifies participants with objective tumor response and were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Based on IRR

The confidence interval for the difference in percentage was based on normal distribution.

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 12 Based on IRR

Analysis was based on the Cox Proportional hazards model assuming proportional hazards, a HR \<1 indicated a reduction in hazard rate in favor of Crizotinib.

Time to Progression (TTP) Based on IRR

Analysis was based on the Cox Proportional hazards model assuming proportional hazards, a HR less than 1 indicated a reduction in hazard rate in favor of Crizotinib.

Time to Intracranial Progression (IC-TTP) Based on IRR

FA population included all participants who were randomized with study treatment assignment designated according to the initial randomization.

Time to Extracranial Progression (EC-TTP) Based on IRR

SAEs

The safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received during the first cycle.

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

The safety analysis population included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study treatment, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received during the first cycle.

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) According to Maximum Severity

Crizotinib Ctrough: Cycle 2 Day 1

Crizotinib Ctrough: Cycle 3 Day 1

Crizotinib Ctrough: Cycle 5 Day 1

PF-06260182 Ctrough: Cycle 2 Day 1

PF-06260182 Ctrough: Cycle 3 Day 1

PF-06260182 Ctrough: Cycle 5 Day 1

Pharmacokinetic concentration population included all participants in the safety analysis population who had at least 1 plasma concentration of crizotinib or its metabolite.N=participants evaluable for this measure.Number of participants analyzed(n)=participants evaluable at specified time points.This analysis was performed in crizotinib arm only.

Plasma Predose Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib and Its Metabolite PF-06260182

V3a/b

No rearrangement

The ALK variant evaluable population included participants from the FA population who had a result from ALK gene fusion variant testing of either no rearrangement, or 1 of 9 results reflecting 8 specific rearrangements (V1, V2, V3a, V3b, V3a/b, V4, V5a, V6, and V7).

Percentage of Participants For Each Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Gene Fusion Variants

The ALK variant evaluable population included participants from the FA population who had a result from ALK gene fusion variant testing of either no rearrangement, or 1 of 9 results reflecting 8 specific rearrangements (V1, V2, V3a, V3b, V3a/b, V4, V5a, V6, and V7). Here, n signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time points.

Objective Response Rate (ORR) of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Variant Groups Based on IRR

HR was calculated based on the Cox Proportional hazards model. Assuming proportional hazards, a HR less than 1 indicated a reduction in hazard rate in favor of crizotinib.

The patient reported outcome (PRO) evaluable population included all participants from the FA population who completed a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline PRO assessment prior to crossover to crizotinib or end of randomized study treatment.

Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Chest Pain, Dyspnea or Cough

QLQ-C30 Global QoL: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 emotional functioning: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 physical functioning: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 role functioning: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 social functioning: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 Global QoL

QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning

QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning

QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning

QLQ-C30 Role Functioning

QLQ-C30 Social Functioning

The PRO evaluable population included all participants from the FA population who completed a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline PRO assessment prior to crossover to crizotinib or end of randomized study treatment.

Change From Baseline in Functioning and Global Quality of Life (QOL) as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

QLQ-C30 appetite loss: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 constipation: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 diarrhea: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 dysponea: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 fatigue: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 financial difficulties: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 insomnia: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 nausea and vomiting: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 pain: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-C30 Appetite loss

QLQ-C30 Constipation

QLQ-C30 Diarrhea

QLQ-C30 Dysponea

QLQ-C30 Fatigue

QLQ-C30 Financial Difficulties

QLQ-C30 Insomnia

QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting

QLQ-C30 Pain

Change From Baseline Scores in QLQ-C30 Symptoms as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

QLQ-LC13 alopecia: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-LC13 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-LC13 coughing: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-LC13 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-LC13 dysphagia: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-LC13 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-LC13 dyspnoea: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-LC13 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-LC13 haemoptysis: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-LC13 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-LC13 pain in arm or shoulder: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-LC13 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-LC13 pain in chest: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-LC13 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-LC13 pain in other parts: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-LC13 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-LC13 peripheral neuropathy: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-LC13 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-LC13 sore mouth: Analysis was from a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EORTC QLQ-LC13 subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose are included as random effects).

QLQ-LC13 Alopecia

QLQ-LC13 Coughing

QLQ-LC13 Dysphagia

QLQ-LC13 Dyspnoea

QLQ-LC13 Haemoptysis

QLQ-LC13 Pain in Arm or Shoulder

QLQ-LC13 Pain in Chest

QLQ-LC13 Pain in Other Parts

QLQ-LC13 Peripheral Neuropathy

QLQ-LC13 Sore Mouth

Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scores as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ- LC13)

Analysis was based on a repeated measures mixed-effects model with an intercept term, treatment, treatment-by-time interaction, and baseline EQ-5D VAS subscale baseline score (intercept and time from first dose were included as random effects).

The patient reported outcome (PRO) evaluable population included all participants from the FA population who completed a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline PRO assessment prior to crossover to crizotinib or end of randomized study treatment. Here, "N" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Change From Baseline in General Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Percentage of Participants With Hospital Admissions-Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU)

Anemia: Grade 1

Anemia: Grade 2

Anemia: Grade 3

Hemoglobin increased: Grade 1

Hemoglobin increased: Grade 2

Lymphocyte count increased: Grade 2

Lymphopenia: Grade 1

Lymphopenia: Grade 2

Lymphopenia: Grade 3

Lymphopenia: Grade 4

Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 1

Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 2

Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 3

Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 4

Platelets: Grade 1

Platelets: Grade 2

Platelets: Grade 3

Platelets: Grade 4

White blood cells: Grade 1

White blood cells: Grade 2

White blood cells: Grade 3

White blood cells: Grade 4

Safety analysis population included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study treatment, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received during the first cycle. Here, N=participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 1 to 4 Hematological Test Abnormalities

Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 1

Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 2

Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 3

Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 4

Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 1

Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 2

Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 3

Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1

Safety analysis population included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study treatment, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received during the first cycle. Here, N=participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, "n"=participants who were evaluable at specified time points.

Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 1 to 4 Chemistry Test Abnormalities

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization	Link
A Clinical Trial Testing The Efficacy Of Crizotinib Versus Standard Chemotherapy Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin Or Carboplatin In Patients With ALK Positive Non Squamous Cancer Of The Lung	NCT01154140	Non Squamous Lu...	treatment treatment	18 Years -	Pfizer
A Clinical Trial Testing The Efficacy Of Crizotinib Versus Standard Chemotherapy Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin Or Carboplatin In Patients With ALK Positive Non Squamous Cancer Of The Lung	NCT01154140	Non Squamous Lu...	treatment treatment	18 Years -	Pfizer

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for alk translocation event positive