Antineoplastic Agents

All Drugs and Chemicals

Capecitabine

Intervention Group :

Subjects undergo structured intensified pharmaceutical care program (POCCP) led by oncology experienced pharmacist (run alongside oncologist patient review at the clinic or daycare) in addition to Current Standard Best Care (SBC)

Control Group :

Subjects undergo usual procedure which is Current Standard Best Care (SBC) for oral chemotherapy treatment which includes pre-chemotherapy review by doctor and prescribing of chemotherapy and supportive medications according to patient's chemotherapy protocol at each visit. Subsequently the patients will collect their prescribed oral medications at the ambulatory pharmacy counter according to the standard procedure of medication dispensing which includes prescription screening, medication filling, double checking, dispensing and counselling at the pharmacy counter as per usual practice of pharmaceutical care of patients.

Structured intensified pharmaceutical care program for patients ongoing oral chemotherapy treatment.

Led by oncology experienced clinical pharmacist and run alongside oncologist patient review at the clinic or daycare.

It utilizes structured educational material (for patients) and monitoring guideline or checklists (for pharmacists) during provision of service at each clinic visit such as patient education, pre-treatment review, medication reconciliation, prescription screening (dose, regime, supportive meds), adherence, adverse drug event monitoring and treatment recommendations on basis of agreed protocols.

Pharmacist scheduled additional review within 1-week interval of start of oral chemotherapy at clinic or via phone call (according to patient's preference) will also be conducted to review patients taking their oral medications at home, assess adherence and symptom experienced to provide individualized recommendations or support to patients.

Pharmacist-led Oral Chemo Care Program (POCCP)

Balamurugan Tangiisuran, PhD

Over the past decade, oral administration of chemotherapy has significantly increased and is anticipated to continue to grow. Despite the conveniences, these oral regimens can be complex and pose challenge to patient adherence. Further safety concerns are warranted due to insufficient patient education, general perception of reduced toxicity with oral treatment, improper prescribing practice, and the lack of monitoring of observable adverse effects.

Therefore, effective medication counselling and patient education is vital to empower patients and their caregivers to increase adherence and safely managed medication to achieve optimal treatment outcome.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacist intervention with structured oral chemotherapy education and patient monitoring on capecitabine treatment effectiveness (Relative Dose Intensity (RDI), Adherence and Persistence), safety outcomes (Adverse Event, Drug Related Problem and Health service utilization) and chemotherapy knowledge and self-efficiency among cancer patient care in Penang, a northern state oncology referral centre.

There are numerous published studies of pharmaceutical care implementations focusing mainly on in-patient setting and currently evolving in ambulatory cancer patients especially in western countries compared to Asian region. However systematic reviews show major gap still exist with paucity of scientific evidence on the effectiveness of therapeutic educational interventions for improving patient safety and adherence to oral chemotherapy mainly due to study design and method that are unable to strongly prove the outcome.

Hence highlighting the novelty and significance for this research using randomized controlled design, standardized \& validated tools for multimodal pharmacist intervention, long-term clinical outcome such as RDI with longitudinal assessment till treatment completion.

Effectiveness of Pharmacist Intervention on Capecitabine Relative Dose Intensity, Adherence, Knowledge & Safety Among Cancer Patients in Malaysia

Effectiveness of Pharmacist Intervention on Capecitabine Relative Dose Intensity, Adherence, Knowledge & Safety Among Cancer Patients in Malaysia.

RDI will be assessed at the end of Cycle 8 (each cycle is 21 days). Relative dose intensity (RDI), defined as the total dose administered divided by the total dose specified by the corresponding standard regimen.

RDI will be assessed at the end of Cycle 4 (each cycle is 21 days). Relative dose intensity (RDI), defined as the total dose administered divided by the total dose specified by the corresponding standard regimen.

Daily Adherence will be assessed at the end of Cycle 8 (each cycle is 21 days). The daily adherence level determined by the pill count, patient diary record at each visit, which considered both the correct administration of capecitabine twice daily for 14 days and correct non-administration of any dose on rest days to be determined as adherent throughout the 21 day cycle.

Persistence to Treatment defined as percentage of patient completed 8 cycle of treatment (each cycle is 21 days).

MARS-5 score will be assessed at the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days). Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) Questionnaire consists of five questions on patterns of nonadherent behaviour to assess patients self-reported adherence to oral capecitabine. Scoring is on a 5-point Likert scale and total score range between 5 and 25 whereby a higher scores means better adherence.

MARS-5 score will be assessed at the end of Cycle 4 (each cycle is 21 days). Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) Questionnaire consists of five questions on patterns of nonadherent behaviour to assess patients self-reported adherence to oral capecitabine. Scoring is on a 5-point Likert scale and total score range between 5 and 25 whereby a higher scores means better adherence.

Capecitabine Medication Taking Behavior (CMTB) will be assessed at the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days).

The questionnaire consists of four questions to further identify aspects of patients non-adherence, their medication-taking and medication-stopping behavior specific for oral capecitabine. Scoring is on a 5-point Likert scale and total score range between 5 and 20 whereby a higher scores means better adherence.

Capecitabine Medication Taking Behavior (CMTB) will be assessed at the end of Cycle 4 (each cycle is 21 days).

The questionnaire consists of four questions to further identify aspects of patients non-adherence, their medication-taking and medication-stopping behavior specific for oral capecitabine. Scoring is on a 5-point Likert scale and total score range between 5 and 20 whereby a higher scores means better adherence.

Capecitabine Medication Taking Behavior (CMTB) will be assessed at the end of Cycle 8 (each cycle is 21 days).

The questionnaire consists of four questions to further identify aspects of patients non-adherence, their medication-taking and medication-stopping behavior specific for oral capecitabine. Scoring is on a 5-point Likert scale and total score range between 5 and 20 whereby a higher scores means better adherence.

Change in Chemotherapy Knowledge \& Self-Efficiency will be assessed at the end of Cycle 1 (3 weeks) from baseline (week 0). Each cycle is 21 days Patients chemotherapy knowledge and self-efficiency level will be assessed using a structured question set.

Change in Chemotherapy Knowledge \& Self-Efficiency will be assessed at the end of Cycle 4 (3 months) from baseline (week 0). Each cycle is 21 days Patients chemotherapy knowledge and self-efficiency level will be assessed using a structured question set.

Change in Chemotherapy Knowledge \& Self-Efficiency will be assessed at the end of Cycle 8 (6 months) from baseline (week 0). Each cycle is 21 days Patients chemotherapy knowledge and self-efficiency level will be assessed using a structured question set.

Change in Toxicity Score will be assessed at the end of Cycle 8 (6 months) from baseline (week 0). Each cycle is 21 days Incidence and severity grading of adverse events related to chemotherapy, will be measured by the reviewing doctor for the duration of treatment follow-up using a standardized ADE monitoring checklist based on the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.0 grading scale.

Frequency of DRPs identified during the study will be reported using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) classification scheme v8.01

Frequency of hospital services utilizations of the patients will be measured for emergency department visit, unplanned oncology clinic or outpatient visits, hospital admissions or had phone calls to oncology clinic.

Universiti Sains Malaysia

Ministry of Health, Malaysia

Principle Investigator

Neoplasms

All Conditions

Urinary Tract, Sexual Organs, and Pregnancy Conditions

Rare Diseases

Carcinoma

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Kidney Neoplasms

Adenocarcinoma

Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Urologic Neoplasms

Urogenital Neoplasms

Urogenital Diseases

Female Urogenital Diseases

Pregnancy Complications

Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications

Kidney Diseases

Urologic Diseases

Male Urogenital Diseases

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

PRISM care is a multidisciplinary program that includes sessions with a hospital pharmacist about the oral chemotherapy: information is given to the patient on adverse events occurrence and management, optimizing drug dosage plan, including drug-drug interactions. Physical sessions will be planned at the beginning of month 1, month 2 and month 3 after the inclusion, then telephone interviews of physical sessions will be planned at month 4, month 5 and month 6. During all these sessions and during the final physical session at the end of month 6, data will be recorded for outcomes assessment.

In the group with standard of care, patients will have interviews with a hospital pharmacist only dedicated to the record of data for outcomes assessment. These sessions will be planned at the beginning of month 1, month 2 and month 3 after the inclusion , and at the end at month 6 after the final physical session.

PRISM care program

Catherine RIOUFOL, PharmD PhD

Soumia BAYARASSOU

Remy DELVA

Mélanie TADJ LESAGE

Hakim MAHAMMEDI

Helen BOYLE

Clothilde LINDET -BOURGEOIS

Haide BOOSTAN

Catherine RIOUFOL, PharmD

Jean-Christophe EYMARD

Fréderic DI FIORE

Aline GUILLOT

Claude LINASSIER

Souad SALHI

The rise of oral targeted therapies favors outpatient care of cancer patients but exposes them to new risks compared to the injectable chemotherapy in the hospital: non-adherence to treatment, inappropriate management of side effects and interactions with other co-prescribed drugs. The clinical consequences (reduced efficacy and potentialized toxicity) are all the more important that ambulatory monitoring of treatments prescribed at the hospital remains underdeveloped due to default of coordination between these two settings.

Adverse drug reactions are a major concern, as such, and because they involve prescription changes (dose reduction, treatment interruption). This results in a decrease in the dose taken and a risk of loss of efficacy.

In the context of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the risk of iatrogenicity is even higher because the oral targeted therapies available in this indication have a safety profile marked by potentially serious toxicities (hematologic and cardiac toxicity) or are known to reduce the treatment adherence (digestive and skin toxicities). In addition, these molecules are metabolized by the CYP3A4 hepatic cytochrome, which leads to avoid associating them with drugs inducing and / or inhibiting the CYP3A4, because of the risk of toxicity and / or loss of efficacy.

The investigators propose to assess a program set up to secure drug taking by enhancing self-management of side effects and control of drug interactions by the patient. This program includes pharmaceutical visits and involves inpatient and outpatient (doctor, referent pharmacist and liberal nurse) professionals.

The hypothesis of the study is that the PRISM care program will improve self-management of side effects by the patient, resulting in a relative dose intensity of oral chemotherapy improved compared to usual care.

Impact of the PRISM-care Multidisciplinary Oncology Program on Secured Drug Intake of Patients With Kidney Cancer

Impact of the PRISM-care Multidisciplinary Oncology Program Versus Usual Care on Secured Drug Intake of Patients With Kidney Cancer, Through Self-management of Adverse Events Related to Oral Targeted Therapies, Control of Drug Interactions, and Sharing of the Information Between Ambulatory and Hospital Settings.

Relative dose intensity will be computed by the ratio between the overall dose delivered and the overall dose prescribed during the 6 months of follow-up.

Adherence will be measured with the prescription renewal rate by the ambulatory pharmacy (adherence will be defined as a rate ≥80%).

the Girerd questionnaire is a medication adherence questionnaire

Involvement will be described by the number and type of: interventions recorded on a dedicated form, solicitations of hospital staff, treatment modifications realized in concertation between oncologist and outpatient doctor.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization	Link
Effectiveness of Pharmacist Intervention on Capecitabine Relative Dose Intensity, Adherence, Knowledge & Safety Among Cancer Patients in Malaysia	NCT04175899	Solid Tumor, Ad...	Pharmacist-led ...	18 Years -	Ministry of Health, Malaysia
Impact of the PRISM-care Multidisciplinary Oncology Program on Secured Drug Intake of Patients With Kidney Cancer	NCT02849535	Metastatic Rena...	PRISM care prog...	18 Years -	Hospices Civils de Lyon

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for relative dose intensity