Neoplasms

Digestive System Diseases

All Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Intestinal Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Digestive System Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Colonic Diseases

Intestinal Diseases

Rectal Diseases

Participants in the Intervention group receive a brochure with their personalized risk score for colorectal cancer and screening recommendations (FIT or colonoscopy) corresponding to their risk level.

Participants in the Usual care group receive the standard brochure designed by the Vaud screening program. This brochure recommends screening to all individuals beginning at age 50 and presents both FIT and colonoscopy as equal options.

Provide participants with information about their personalized risk for colorectal cancer and appropriate screening recommendations to facilitate their screening option choice.

Intervention brochure

Provide participants with general information about options for colorectal cancer screening.

Control brochure

Kevin Selby, MD, MAS

The primary objective is to study the effect of communicating individual CRC risk score and screening recommendations on appropriate screening uptake at six months in individuals at low, moderate and high risk of developing CRC.

The secondary objectives:

* Assess the feasibility of a subsequent larger RCT designed to detect a change in clinical outcomes;
* Explore the impact of psychological factors (perceived susceptibility for CRC, perceived benefits from and barriers to screening) on appropriate screening uptake and participation rates.

The investigators will perform a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 880 residents from the canton Vaud (Switzerland) aged between 50 and 69 years. The QCancer calculator will be used to calculate the personalized risk score. The participants in the intervention group will receive a brochure with a personalized risk score and appropriate screening recommendations. The participants in the control group will receive the standard brochure of the Vaud CRC screening program, regardless of participants' risk level. Six months after the intervention, the investigators will measure the proportion of the participants who have undergone appropriate screening. Screening will be considered as appropriate if participants at high risk undertake colonoscopy and participants at low risk undertake FIT. Both tests are appropriate for participants at moderate-risk. The hypothesis is that in the intervention group, individuals will be more likely to undergo screening appropriate to a participant's individual risk level, whereas the choice of the screening test in the control group will not differ between risk levels.

This study should advance the field of risk-based screening. This may give insights about how to optimize CRC screening programs and offer to the population screening options with a better risk-benefit balance.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be effectively prevented by screening. Risk to develop CRC within 15 years is related to increasing age, sex, family history, and lifestyle and, thus, can vary from \<1% to \>15%.

Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and colonoscopy are the most widely used screening tests. Colonoscopy is the most accurate test, but is related to risks of bleeding and perforation. Colonoscopy resources are limited, and high uptake of screening colonoscopy for low-risk individuals can cause long wait times for those with CRC symptoms or positive FIT. FIT is less costly can be done at home without preparation and, if done regularly, prevents most CRC mortality, especially in moderate and low-risk individuals. To offer the screening options with a reasonable risk-benefit balance, FIT should be recommended to individuals at low (\<3% to develop CRC in 15 years) and moderate (3-6%) risk, and colonoscopy to those at high (\>6%) risk.

The primary objective is to study the effect of communicating individual CRC risk score and screening recommendations on appropriate screening uptake at six months in individuals at low, moderate and high risk of developing CRC.

The secondary objectives:

* Assess the feasibility of a subsequent larger RCT designed to detect a change in clinical outcomes;
* Explore the impact of psychological factors (perceived susceptibility for CRC, perceived benefits from and barriers to screening) on appropriate screening uptake and participation rates.

The investigators will perform a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 880 residents from the canton Vaud (Switzerland) aged between 50 and 69 years. The QCancer calculator will be used to calculate the personalized risk score. The participants in the intervention group will receive a brochure with a personalized risk score and appropriate screening recommendations. The participants in the control group will receive the standard brochure of the Vaud CRC screening program, regardless of the participant's risk level. Six months after the intervention, the investigators will measure the proportion of the participants who have undergone appropriate screening. Screening will be considered as appropriate if participants at high risk undertake colonoscopy and participants at low risk undertake FIT. Both tests are appropriate for participants at moderate-risk. The hypothesis is that in the intervention group, individuals will be more likely to undergo screening appropriate to participant's individual risk level, whereas the choice of the screening test in the control group will not differ between risk levels.

This study should advance the field of risk-based screening. This may give insights about how to optimize CRC screening programs and offer to the population screening options with a better risk-benefit balance.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Predicted Risk

Protocol Title: Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions Based on Predicted Risk: the PREcision ScreENing Randomized Controlled Trial (PRESENT)

Upon publication of the primary results, the data that support the findings of this study will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Proportion who completed screening test appropriate to risk level. For low risk (\<3% 15-yr CRC risk), completing a FIT. For intermediate risk (3-6%15-yr CRC risk), completing a FIT, completing a colonoscopy, or having a colonoscopy appointment. For high risk (\>6% 15-yr CRC risk), completing a colonoscopy or having a colonoscopy appointment.

Proportion who completed any CRC screening test (FIT, colonoscopy, colonoscopy appointment, CT colonography, blood test, etc.

Proportion of those invited with completed paper or electronic consent

Proportion of those who returned the baseline questionnaire who are eligible for the Vaud screening program (i.e. not up-to-date with screening, not in colonoscopy surveillance, no personal CRC history, etc.)

Mean anxiety score using adapted questions from a standardized questionnaire (STAI Fr)

Proportion of study participants who consent and whose screening status are obtained from the Vaud CRC screening program

Proportion of study participants who consent and whose cancer status are obtained from the Vaud tumor registry. Long time frame chosen given considerable delay in updating the tumor registry and interest in cancer outcomes several years after measurement of primary outcome.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for screening behavior