Neoplasms

Respiratory Tract (Lung and Bronchial) Diseases

All Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Carcinoma

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Neoplasms, Squamous Cell

Respiratory Tract Neoplasms

Thoracic Neoplasms

Lung Diseases

Respiratory Tract Diseases

All Drugs and Chemicals

Antibodies

Immunoglobulins

administration of bispecific PSAMxCD3 Ab CC-1.

CC-1 and Toczilizumab

This trial is a phase I study in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of second line therapy aiming to evaluate safety and efficacy of CC-1, a bispecific antibody (bsAb) with PSMAxCD3 specificity developed within DKTK. CC-1 binds to human prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on tumor cells of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (SCC) as well as to tumor vessels of SCC, thereby allowing for a dual mode of anti-cancer action. CC-1 was developed in a novel format which not only prolongs serum half-life but most importantly reduces off-target T cell activation with expected fewer side effects. Together with preemptive IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) blockade using tocilizumab, this allows for application of effective bsAb doses with expected high anticancer activity. The study comprises two phases: The first phase is a dose-escalation phase with concomitant prophylactic application of tocilizumab to evaluate the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of CC-1. This is followed by a dose-expansion phase (also with prophylactic IL-6R blockade using tocilizumab). A translational research program comprising, among others, analysis of CC-1 half-life and the induced immune response as well as molecular profiling in liquid biopsies will serve to better define the mode of action of CC-1 and to identify biomarkers for further clinical development.

SCC of the lung is an aggressive malignant disease with poor prognosis after failure of established therapies. Any drug employed after second-line treatment is associated with only limited clinical benefit. Therefore, there is a high medical need for new therapeutic approaches in this patient population. The clinical effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC have proven the potential of T-cell based immunotherapy in this entity. The rationale for the therapeutic use of CC-1 is based on its proposed mode of action as a bsAb being specifically designed to direct T cells via its CD3 binding part towards tumor target cells via its PSMA binding part. Furthermore, CC-1 also reacts with tumor vessels of NSCLC thereby allowing for a dual mode of anti-cancer action by also attacking tumor blood supply and allowing for improved influx of immune effector cells. Due to its unique ability to redirect T cells via CD3 for PSMA-expressing tumor cell lysis, CC-1 can elicit repeated target cell elimination by cytotoxic T cells and a polyclonal response of previously primed CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Compared to other immunotherapeutics presently being approved or in development (bsAbs with alternative formats like the authorised bsAb blinatumomab or other antibodies or CAR T cells), CC-1 is expected to offer the following major advantages:

(i) Reduction of off-target T cell activation and thus reduction of side effects due to its optimized format (ii) The possibility to tightly steer anti-target activity via serum level-controlled antibody application which, in contrast to CAR T cells, allows for termination of activity if desired.

On the background of the poor prognosis of patients with SCC of the lung after second-line therapy, the bsAb CC-1 holds promise as a new treatment option of immunotherapy for these patients.

The planned study will include patients with SCC of the lung with detectable PSMA expression on tumor cells after second line treatment. PSMA expression is to be determined by central immunohistochemical assessment of fresh or kryopreserved tumor samples. Only patients with proven PSMA expression on tumor cells as defined by ≥10% positivity of tumor cells can be included. The requirement of ≥10% positivity of tumor cells for PSMA expression cells is in line with definitions of positivity for target antigen expression employed for other antibodies used in cancer treatment, for example the human epidermal receptor protein-2 (HER2)-specific antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Both antibodies are approved for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, and HER2 positivity is given if ≥10% of tumor cells show staining for HER2 as assessed by immunohistochemistry .

PSMA-positivity is estimated for about 50% of screened patients with SCC of the lung.

Further as a translational research program the investigators implemented PSMA-PET CTs at different time points. PSMA positivity in PSMA-PET CT has been described on several tumor entities including tumors of the lung. In line, PSMA expression has been described on tumor cells and neovasculature of tumor in lung cancer, especially SCC of the lung. However, a correlation of PSMA-PET positive tumors with immunhistochemical PSMA evaluation has so far not been described.

The implementation of PSMA-PET as additional imaging to routine CT, will further improve treatment for patients with SCC of the lung as results of PSMA-PET may replace biopsy in future patients. A maximum of three PSMA-PET CTs may be performed.

Study rationale with regard to objectives and further development of CC-1

In nonclinical studies, in vitro and in vivo, proof of concept, preliminary PK and PK/PD effects as well as toxicology have been evaluated. However, due to differences between animal models and the human situation, some aspects have to be assessed and further characterised in humans. For example, the target mediated drug disposition (TMDD), an effect that largely influences the serum half-life of antibody molecules particularly at low concentrations, cannot be properly addressed in mice. Furthermore, non-human primates (NHP) and rodents have several limitations as predictive models for toxicity and immunogenicity evaluation of CC-1. The CD3 binding part of CC-1 does not cross-react with CD3 of macaques and thus it is not possible to evaluate in these NHPs dose limiting side effects. Likewise, although CC-1 is cross-reactive with macaque-PSMA, PSMA distribution in macaques significantly differs from that in humans. The same holds true for rodents.

Due to the high medical need for patients with SCC of the lung after second-line treatment, the planned phase I trial is designed to confirm and further explore the safety and tolerability of the PSMAxCD3 bsAb CC-1 in adult patients with SCC of the lung. The primary objective is incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) under therapy with CC-1. Furthermore, the trial aims to expand experience on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicology of CC-1 from nonclinical studies to the human situation in relation to the PK, expected efficacy and safety. A focus will be on the following specific aspects/parameters:

* Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CC-1 in humans
* Immunogenicity of CC-1 in humans based on both absolute (number and percentage of subjects who develop human anti-human antibody (HAHA).
* Absolute changes from baseline in laboratory parameters
* Change in cytokines from baseline
* Assessment of response rate by RECIST on routine imaging
* Evaluation of PSMA PET CT in a translational research program
* Overall and progression free survival

Rationale for preemptive IL-6R blockade by Tocilizumab

As described above, in the planned study the investigators exploit the strategy to use tocilizumab rather to prevent development of CRS in the first place than to treat CRS once it has arisen.

This strategy holds promise to increase the safety of study patients and timely study conduct. By starting the study treatment with CC-1 directly with prophylactic tocilizumab, all study patients will benefit from the expected advantage of this combination with regard to safety and can be treated with sufficiently high doses of CC-1 to achieve dose levels high enough to hopefully result in efficacy effects.

The rationale for preemptive IL-6R blockade by tocilizumab treatment is based on i. The firmly established efficiency and safety of tocilizumab for the treatment of CRS

ii. Lack of clear evidence for increased tumor growth as potential drawback of IL-6R blockage iii. Observations that IL-6 activity, while being responsible for the undesirable sequelae of CRS, appears not to be required for the therapeutic activity of CC-1 CRS that was induced by therapy with the approved bsAb blinatumomab was reported to be successfully treated by tocilizumab. Most importantly, despite rapid disappearance of clinical CRS symptoms, the therapeutic activity of the bsAb blinatumomab was maintained. Furthermore, tocilizumab was also used in the very recent FIH study with the REGN1917 (CD20xCD3) antibody.

Our own nonclinical studies demonstrate that tocilizumab does not impair the therapeutic activity of CC-1, neither in vitro nor in vivo. This is in contrast to steroids which are currently recommended and used as pre- and concomitant treatment to prevent CRS upon blinatumomab therapy.

Due to the mechanism of action of tocilizumab, there is a theoretical risk of tumor development or tumor progression due to immune modulation. On the basis of the current literature derived from large studies conducted in Japan, the USA and Europe, however, there is no evidence for an increased tumor risk upon application of tocilizumab. Only one Japanese study described a minimally increased risk of de novo lymphoma development. However, this could not be confirmed in any other study. Especially for lung cancer, there is no evidence for an increased incidence rate. Interestingly, high systemic IL-6 levels are associated with dismal prognosis in NSCLC. Furthermore, tocilizumab is currently being investigated in several Phase I/II studies for the treatment of solid and hematological neoplasia without evidence for an influence on tumor pathophysiology. Based on these findings, no relevant negative effects of tocilizumab on the efficacy and safety of CC-1 are expected.

Open-label, multicenter dose escalation and dose expansion phase I trial, designed to gain evidence of maximally tolerated and recommended phase-II dose of CC-1 in adult patients with SCC of the lung

Bispecific PSMAxCD3 Antibody CC-1 in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

PPhase-I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of the Bispecific PSMAxCD3 Antibody CC-1 as Single Agent and Combined With Checkpoint Blockade in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Correlation with immunhistochemical proven PSMA expression on tumor at baseline

• Value of PSMA-PET-CT in the context of treatment with CC-1 and progressive disease will be performed in terms of a translational research program to correlate PSMA expression as assessed by cryobiopsy with PSMA imaging. PSMA-PET CT will be performed at baseline, EOSf and at any time point during study treatment (cycle 1-6) if progressive disease is assumed in routine imaging, next imaging will be amended by PSMA-PET. Thus, a minimum of 2 and maximum of 3 PSMA-PET-CTs will be performed per patient.

Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) (CTCAE V5.0) over 22 days (i.e. until end of first treatment cycle)

Full hematology assessments for safety hemoglobin, red blood cells, platelets, mean cell volume, mean cell hemoglobin concentration, mean cell hemoglobin, white blood cells, absolute differential white cell count and absolute neutrophil count or segmented neutrophil count and Band forms should be performed at each visit and when clinically indicated.

Biochemistry assessments for safety:

sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, glucose, creatinine, total bilirubin, gamma glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase,aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, urea or blood urea nitrogen, total protein, albumin and lactic dehydrogenase are performed.

To define the recommended phase-II dose of CC-1 under preemptive IL-6R blockade

I

Number and percentage of subjects who develop HAHA at day 15 of every cycle and End Of Safety follw-up (day 43 of last cycle of a given patient) as compared to baseline.

n case of CC-1 in this study, AESIs include cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) as the major "class toxicity" for bsAbs, anaphylactic reactions and immunogenicity of the drug substance

With regard to trial schedule and AESI occurrence, AESIs constitute:

* CRS (i.e. within treatment period)
* Anaphylactic reactions upon study drug administration (i.e., within 24h)
* Development of anti-CC-1 antibodies (HAHA) (day 15, day 43)

AESIs are always be addressed as part of the patient safety report to the DSMB, also non-occurrence will be mentioned . Depending on severity of the AESI, dose reduction or discontinuation of treatment (DLT) may be necessary. Of note, allergic /anaphylactic reactions are not defined as DLT.

Objective tumor response assessed by RECIST on routine imaging at End of safety follow-up and thereafter for 12 months every 3 months.

• For patients receiving more than one cycle objective tumor response will be assessed by RECIST on additional routine imaging every 6 weeks, i.e. prior to the application of cycle 3 (day 22 +/- 5 days of cycle 2) and cycle 5 (day 22 +/-5 days of cycle 4).

Tumor response rate (TRR) The TRR is defined as the percentage of patients with complete remissions (CR) and partial remissions (PR) according to RECIST version 1.1. The TRR will be assessed at 3 and 6 months, as well as every 3 months during the extended treatment period (compare Trial Schedule). For patients receiving additional treatment cycles TRR will be assessed before the application of cycle 3 (day 22 +/- 5 days of cycle 2) and cycle 5 (day 22 +/-5 days of cycle 4).

OS is defined as the time from screening to time of death from any cause. Patients without event are censored at the last date of follow-up.

University Hospital Tuebingen

German Cancer Research Center

Symptoms and General Pathology

Digestive System Diseases

Disease Progression

Colorectal Neoplasms

Intestinal Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Digestive System Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Colonic Diseases

Intestinal Diseases

Rectal Diseases

Antineoplastic Agents

Anti-Infective Agents

Irinotecan

Cetuximab

Everolimus

Sirolimus

Temsirolimus

MTOR Inhibitors

Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Enzyme Inhibitors

Immunosuppressive Agents

Immunologic Factors

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with KRAS mutant tumours are treated with cetuximab, everolimus and irinotecan.

Patients with KRAS wildtype colorectal cancer that have progressed on therapy with cetuximab and irinotecan are treated with cetuximab, irinotecan and everolimus.

Patients with KRAS mutant tumours are treated with cetuximab, everolimus and irinotecan as third line.

Patients with KRAS wildtype tumours that have progressed on therapy with cetuximab and irinotecan are treated with cetuximab, everolimus and Irinotecan.

Benny V Jensen, MD

This is an open, multicenter phase II trial of therapy with a combination of cetuximab, and irinotecan every second week combined with a daily dose of everolimus to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutation or to patients resistent to cetuximab and irinotecan therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Main objective:

* Number of patients with progressive disease that obtain disease control defined as the sum of patients that obtain a Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission(PR, or stable disease (SD))

Secondary objectives:

* Time to progression after first therapy.
* Length of disease control (CR, PR and SD)
* Survival from date of start of therapy.
* Safety and toxicity of the therapy graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0
* Influence of smoking on disease control, response, survival and time to progression and other effect parameters in the investigation.
* Significance of metabolic response evaluated by a Photon Emissions Tomography (PET)/Computer Tomography(CT)scan.
* Blood: Examine the influence of potential predictive and prognostic tumour biomarkers in blood as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER-2), YKL-40, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) ,metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 (TIMP-1), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), Procollagen type 3 N-terminal propeptide (P3NP), gen-, micro-ribonucleinate (microRNA)- and protein array profiles, metabolomics and C-reactive protein (CRP) 2 weeks after start of therapy and thereafter every 8.weeks on disease control, response, survival and time to progression and other parameters investigated.
* Tissue: Examine possible predictive and prognostic biomarkers in tissue from primary tumour or metastases for micro-RNAarray profiles, mutations in K-RAS, murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (BRAF), Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PIK3CA), EGFR, tumor protein 53 (p53), and protein expression and polymorphisms of th phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), epiregulin (EREG), amphiregulin (AREG), Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), IGF-1 Receptor (IGF-1R), VEGF, p53, topoisomerase 1 (Topo1), YKL-40, and TIMP-1
* Correlation between possible predictive and prognostic biomarkers in blood and tissue.

Irinotecan, Cetuximab and Everolimus to Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Phase II Examination of Irinotecan, Cetuximab and Everolimus to Chemotherapy Resistent Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and KRAS Mutations or After Progression With KRAS Wildtype on Irinotecan and Cetuximab - Effect and Biological Markers

Clinical benefit is defined as the number of patients with stable disease lasting 2 months and partial response and CR as defined in RECIST 1.1

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Bispecific PSMAxCD3 Antibody CC-1 in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung	NCT04496674	Lung Cancer Squ...	CC-1 and Toczil...	18 Years -	German Cancer Research Center
Irinotecan, Cetuximab and Everolimus to Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer	NCT01387880	Metastatic Colo...	Everolimus Everolimus	18 Years -	Herlev Hospital
Irinotecan, Cetuximab and Everolimus to Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer	NCT01387880	Metastatic Colo...	Everolimus Everolimus	18 Years -	Herlev Hospital
Irinotecan, Cetuximab and Everolimus to Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer	NCT01387880	Metastatic Colo...	Everolimus Everolimus	18 Years -	Herlev Hospital

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for third line therapy