The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Alvocidib, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride or Cytarabine and Daunorubicin Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Official Title: Randomized Phase II Trial of Timed Sequential Therapy (TST) With Alvocidib (Flavopiridol), Ara-C and Mitoxantrone (FLAM) vs. "7+3" for Adults Age 70 and Under With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
Study ID: NCT01349972
Brief Summary: This randomized phase II trial is studying how alvocidib, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone hydrochloride work compared to cytarabine and daunorubicin hydrochloride in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Alvocidib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cytarabine, mitoxantrone hydrochloride, and daunorubicin hydrochloride work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether giving alvocidib, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone hydrochloride is more effective than giving cytarabine and daunorubicin hydrochloride in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Detailed Description: PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the rate of complete remission (CR) after 1 course of induction therapy with the timed-sequential combination of alvocidib (flavopiridol), cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside \[ara-C\]), and mitoxantrone hydrochloride (FLAM) vs traditional "7+3" cytarabine and daunorubicin hydrochloride (ara-C + Daunorubicin) for adults (age 18 to 70) with newly diagnosed, previously untreated, intermediate-risk or poor-risk acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate and compare the toxicities of FLAM vs 7+3. II. To compare the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in response to FLAM vs 7+3. III. To detect and compare the presence of minimal-residual disease (MRD) remaining after FLAM vs 7+3. IV. To determine the expression of ABC transport proteins multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1, ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP, ABCG2) on AML blasts pretreatment and correlate the expressions of one or both proteins with CR and DFS in response to FLAM vs 7+3. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to risk features: age (\< 50 vs \>= 50), secondary AML (pre-existing myelodysplatic syndrome \[MDS\], myeloproliferative diseases \[MPD\], treatment-related \[t\]-AML, or severe multi-lineage dysplasia) and/or known adverse cytogenetics, and hyperleukocytosis (white blood cells \[WBC\] \>= 50,000/mm\^3). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive alvocidib intravenously (IV) over 1 hour on days 1-3, cytarabine IV over 72 hours on days 6-8, and mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 1-2 hours on day 9. Patients who achieve complete or partial response to the first course (completion of all doses) may receive a second course of treatment or high-dose cytarabine after 21-63 days following blood count recovery, and/or undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplant. ARM II: Patients receive cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-7 and daunorubicin hydrochloride IV on days 1-3. Patients who have residual disease on day 14 may receive additional cytarabine for 5 days and daunorubicin hydrochloride for 2 days. Patients may undergo blood and bone marrow collection for correlative studies. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 5 years, and then annually thereafter.
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale-Phoenix, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
Blood and Marrow Transplant Group of Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Maryland/Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States
Name: B. Smith
Affiliation: Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR