Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Prospective Study on Double-Stapling End-to-End Gastroduodenostomy Billroth-I Anastomosis in Laparoscopy-Assisted Surgery for Locally Advanced Distal Gastric Cancers

Study Description

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to explore the clinical application value of Double-Stapling End-to-End Gastroduodenostomy Billroth-I Anastomosis in Laparoscopy-Assisted Surgery for Locally Advanced Distal Gastric Cancers.

Detailed Description: As one of the core contents of gastric cancer surgery, the choice of digestive tract reconstruction method has always been the focus of clinical research in gastric cancer surgery. There are many alternative methods of digestive tract reconstruction at present, but there is no absolute superiority among various reconstruction methods. According to the individual characteristics of patients, the selection of appropriate digestive tract reconstruction methods should be an important direction in the future research field of digestive tract reconstruction. There are many methods of digestive tract reconstruction in distal gastrectomy, including Billroth-I anastomosis, Billroth-II anastomosis and Roux-en-Y anastomosis. However, the standard method of reconstruction after distal subtotal gastrectomy does not reach a consensus. According to Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2018, gastroduodenostomy and gastrojejunal anastomosis are recommended after distal subtotal gastrectomy for middle-low gastric cancer, but the priority of different surgical procedures is not clarified. The conclusion is that there is no significant difference between the Billroth-I, Billroth-II and Roux-en-Y in postoperative quality of life, nutritional status and long-term prognosis of patients. Roux-en-Y anastomosis has a lower incidence of bile reflux, but a higher incidence of delayed gastric emptying compared with Billroth-I and Billroth-II. Similarly, the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines in 2018 did not specify the priority of reconstruction methods after distal gastrectomy. In China, the 2022 CSCO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer also did not specify the priority of reconstruction methods, pointing out that alternative reconstruction methods include Billroth-I, Billroth-II combine with Braun anastomosis, Roux-en-Y anastomosis, and jejunal interposition. However, the number of alternative methods indicates that no ideal reconstruction method has absolute advantages. Therefore, in clinical practice, the specific choice of digestive tract reconstruction method often needs to be determined by considering many factors, including the location of the primary tumor, tumor stage, lymph node condition, anatomical variation and patient's economic situation, etc., which are important factors affecting the choice of digestive tract reconstruction method. With the development of laparoscopic technique in recent years, totally laparoscopic digestive tract reconstruction has become a hot spot in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. Laparoscopic digestive tract reconstruction has smaller incision and less trauma, which is a higher-level laparoscopic surgery pursued by surgeons. However, for patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer, totally laparoscopic distal gastroduodenal anastomosis is technically difficult. Delta anastomosis was proposed by Professor Kannaya in Japan in 2002. In this technique, the functional end to end anastomosis of the posterior wall of the remnant gastroduodenal was completed by using endoscopic linear staplers under totally laparoscopy, and the suture nails inside the anastomosis were triangular. It is a widely used functional end to end anastomosis of remnant gastroduodenum after distal gastrectomy under totally laparoscopic surgery. However, because of the operation in the duodenum and stomach from broken should meet the requirements of R0 resection of tumor, proper anastomotic tension, and blood supply of free longer duodenal stump, its restrictive factors, poor controllability, security is still not widely recognized, it can only be carried out in centers with rich experience in laparoscopic surgery, and it is more suitable for early cases of gastric Antrum. In 2016, Professor Changming Huang found that modified Delta anastomosis is safe and feasible in early gastric cancer, but caution is still needed for locally advanced gastric cancer, its incidence of postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage was significantly higher than that of laparoscopic-assisted Billroth-I anastomosis. In 1995, Oka et al. reported the use of circular stapler for functional end to end anastomosis of remnant gastroduodenum in open distal gastric cancer radical resection. In 2004, they reported the results of 221 cases, showing that this anastomosis was clinically safe and reliable. In 2007, Yang et al. in Korea confirmed that functional end to end anastomosis was safe and feasible in 933 cases of distal gastric cancer, with similar short-term outcomes compared with Billroth-II anastomosis. However, the clinical staging of gastric cancer patients in Japan and Korea is mainly early stage, but in China, the clinical staging of gastric cancer patients is mostly advanced stage. In conclusion, traditional Billroth-I end-to-side anastomosis and Delta anastomosis require an additional residual gastric tissue of at least 3cm. In addition, the safe margin of the broken end of advanced gastric cancer requires a distance of at least 3-5 cm from the tumor, which often leads to higher anastomotic tension and significantly increases the risk of anastomotic leakage. Therefore, we propose a new technique for gastrointestinal reconstruction in laparoscopic distal radical gastrectomy in locally advanced gastric cancer: Double-Stapling End-to-End Gastroduodenostomy Billroth-I Anastomosis in Laparoscopy-Assisted Surgery. After previous practice, this anastomotic method can not only ensure a safe surgical margin, but also retain more residual stomach, so as to effectively solve the problem of anastomotic tension. It is a safe, simple, physiological and economic anastomotic method.

Keywords

Eligibility

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT

Sex: ALL

Healthy Volunteers: No

Locations

Contact Details

Useful links and downloads for this trial