The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: En Bloc TURBT With Collins Loop vs Conventional TURBT
Official Title: Transurethral En Bloc Resection With Collins Loop vs Conventional Transurethral Resection for the Treatment of Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma
Study ID: NCT05027412
Brief Summary: This is a prospective, randomized, randomized and single-blind study in patients diagnosed with primary bladder CV. Patients diagnosed by cystoscopy of a bladder tumor and with indication for endoscopic surgical treatment, who meet the inclusion criteria, and who sign the Informed Consent (IC), will be randomized.
Detailed Description: The main objective of the study is to assess the quality of the resection, defined as the presence of detrusor muscle in the resected tissue. The secondary objetives are: * Compare the surgical time, hospital stay, urinary catheterization time and incidence of complications. * Compare tumor recurrence after one year of follow up. * Determine the number of re-TURB as a consequence of the absence of muscle layer in the sample or artifacts (Tx) * Establish the incidence of conversions as a consequence of difficulties in the technique or intraoperative bleeding. * Compare the degree of satisfaction of the surgeon
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
Name: emilio f ripalda, MD
Affiliation: Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR