Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Shave Margins vs. Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: Shave Margins vs. Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients

Official Title: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Routine Shave Margins vs. Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients

Study ID: NCT02772731

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Interventions

Partial mastectomy plus additional Shave Margin

Partial mastectomy

Study Description

Brief Summary: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting women in the US. Surgical management is the mainstay of therapy, and in general consists of resection of the primary tumor with either a partial mastectomy (aka "lumpectomy") or a total mastectomy. The investigators hypothesize that routine shave margins during partial mastectomy will significantly reduce positive margin rate. A positive margin means that cancerous cells were detected at the edge of the excised area. This generally mandates a return to the operating room for re-excision.

Detailed Description: Some authors have investigated, in a retrospective fashion, the use of routine shave margins, where surgeons routinely take additional margins at the time of the initial partial mastectomy as a means of obtaining negative margins. While these retrospective studies have found that positive margin rates declined using this technique, opponents to this technique wonder if this truly results in a higher negative margin rate without compromising cosmesis or increasing tissue volume removed. As these studies were retrospective, it was possible that the initial resection was smaller than what those who do not routinely take shave margins would resect. No one had evaluated the impact of further resection on operative time, nor in a blinded fashion, evaluated cosmesis. Further, there had yet to be a prospective study to evaluate the impact of this on local recurrence rates. Hence, the investigators performed a prospective randomized controlled trial of this technique at Yale. The data from this study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that the technique cut positive margin and re-excision rates in half. Some wondered, however, about the external generalizability of these findings, particularly in non-academic settings. Hence, a multicenter trial to validate these findings is warranted.