Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Wide Margin vs. Narrow Margin in Postneoadjuvant Lumpectomy

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: Wide Margin vs. Narrow Margin in Postneoadjuvant Lumpectomy

Official Title: Surgical Resection Margin According to the Post-treatment Tumor Volume Versus the Pre-treatment Tumor Volume in Breast Conservative Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Primary Systemic Therapy: Randomized Controlled Trial

Study ID: NCT03417622

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Interventions

Bracketing

Neoadjuvant therapy

Post-treatment volume margin resection

Pre-treatment volume margin resection

Study Description

Brief Summary: Breast cancer patients often receive systemic drugs as the initial curative treatment of their disease. The initial systemic therapy leads to a variable degree of tumor shrinkage. At present, there is no evidence-based consensus among breast surgeons on the optimal extent of resection after considerable tumor shrinkage and whether resection margin should be designed according to the tumor extent before treatment or the extent after treatment. This trial will help determine the optimal extent of resection in tumors that exhibits a significant change in volume after primary systemic therapy.

Detailed Description: Primary systemic (neoadjuvant) therapy (NAT) is a widely practised curative treatment for invasive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (before surgery) and adjuvant chemotherapy (after surgery) had equivalent survival rates in major randomized trials. In these studies, preoperative systemic therapy increased the patient's chance to achieve breast conservation. The down side was a clear trend towards increased ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Preoperative chemotherapy leads to patchy, irregular cell death known as honeycomb effect and thus may lead to a misleading false negative resection margin of a tumorectomy operation. Even with the advent of oncoplastic techniques which allowed larger resection volumes with satisfactory cosmetic results, rates of re-excision, mastectomy and local relapse did not differ from those after traditional lumpectomy operations. As of today, there is no consensus -based on evidence- on the optimal width of margin in patients who are offered breast conservative surgery (BCS) after systemic therapy. In view of the current uncertainty and lack of evidence, The present trial is designed to answer the following question (Specific aim): Does planning the resection margin according to the pre-treatment tumor extent improve the local recurrence rate in patients receiving breast conservative surgery after systemic therapy?