The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Comparison of PET/CT vs. PET/MRI Using 2 Radiopharmaceuticals
Official Title: Comparison of PET/CT vs. PET/MRI
Study ID: NCT03125629
Brief Summary: This clinical trial studies how well positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) works compared to PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating patients with cancer. PET/CT and PET/MRI may determine which scanner is best for the patient's type of cancer and other types of cancers.
Detailed Description: PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate if PET/CT and PET/MRI scanners provide equivalent results for evaluation of cancer patients. OUTLINE: Patients receive standard of care 18F-fludeoxyglucose (FDG) or Ga68-DOTA-TATE intravenously (IV). Within 45-60 minutes, patients then undergo PET/CT imaging immediately followed by PET/MRI. Each participant is to receive 18-FDG or 68Ga-DOTA-TATE only, no participant was to receive both radiotracers.
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
Stanford University, School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
Name: Andrei Iagaru
Affiliation: Stanford University
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR