⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ "A total no brainer"

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ "Love this, so easy."

Spots is the easy way to track your skin, mole and cancer changes.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Ramosetron, Aprepitant, and Dexamethasone Versus Palonosetron, Aprepitant, and Dexamethasone

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: Ramosetron, Aprepitant, and Dexamethasone Versus Palonosetron, Aprepitant, and Dexamethasone

Official Title: Comparison of Ramosetron, Aprepitant, and Dexamethasone (RAD) With Palonosetron, Aprepitant, and Dexamethasone (PAD) for Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy

Study ID: NCT02532634

Conditions

Cancer
Tumors

Study Description

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to compare the anti-emetic effect of ramosetron plus aprepitant and dexamethasone with palonosetron plus aprepitant and dexamethasone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Detailed Description: Currently, palonosetron is the clinically preferred antiemetic for Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).However the best 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor (5-HT3R) antagonists for use in a triple drug combination for high emetogenic chemotherapy(HEC) has not yet been determined in randomized trials. Previous anti-emetic guidelines stated that the anti-emetic activities of 5-HT3R antagonists were similar at equivalent doses. Based on the meta-analysis of various 5-HT3R antagonists in double regimens, the NCCN guideline has suggested palonosetron as a preferred 5-HT3R antagonist in the triple antiemetic drug combination. But in Asia, RAD is one of the most popular treatments for HEC-treated cancer patients. However, the lack of clinical studies has precluded the recommendation of RAD as a standard regimen for HEC-induced CINV. In two previous studies conducted in Korea, RAD regimen showed significant efficacy for prevention of CINV which is comparable to the efficacy reported from the studies evaluating with PAD regimen. If the efficacy of RAD regimen is evidently proven by this kind of randomized multicenter-trial, RAD regimen can be more recommended as a standard regimen for HEC-induced CINV.

Eligibility

Minimum Age: 19 Years

Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT

Sex: ALL

Healthy Volunteers: No

Locations

St. Vincent'S Hospital, Suwon, Gyeonggi, Korea, Republic of

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, , Korea, Republic of

Chungnam National University Hospita, Daejeon, , Korea, Republic of

Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, , Korea, Republic of

Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, , Korea, Republic of

Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, , Korea, Republic of

Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, , Korea, Republic of

Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, , Korea, Republic of

Severance Hospital, Seoul, , Korea, Republic of

Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, , Korea, Republic of

Contact Details

Name: Jin-Hyoung Kang, Ph.D

Affiliation: The Catholic University of Korea

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Name: Jung Hye Kwon, PhD

Affiliation: Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Useful links and downloads for this trial

Clinicaltrials.gov

Google Search Results

Logo

Take Control of Your Skin and Body Changes Today.

Try out Spots for free, set up only takes 2 mins.

spots app storespots app store

Join others from around the world: