The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Evaluation of Oxaliplatin and Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Bladder Cancer
Official Title: Evaluation of Oxaliplatin and Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Bladder Cancer
Study ID: NCT04039867
Brief Summary: This phase II trial evaluated the impact of Oxaliplatin and Gemcitabine in patients with recurrent or advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. The combination of Oxaliplatin and Gemcitabine is considered investigational and this study will help in determining if their activity and toxicity profiles are comparable or better than the standard regimens.
Detailed Description: The combination of Oxaliplatin and Gemcitabine has synergistic effects on a variety of human cancer cell lines in vitro. Clinically, it has demonstrated activity in other malignancies including lung, and pancreas. In the former study, poor prognosis advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients received Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 and Oxaliplatin 65mg/m2 both on days 1 and 8. The overall response rate was 16%, with no reports of neutropenic fever. In the latter study, locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer patients received Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 on day 1 and Oxaliplatin 100mg/m2 on day 2 every 2 weeks. The overall response rate was 31%. The toxicity profile included grades 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 11%, 14% for nausea or vomiting, 6.2% for diarrhea, and 11% for peripheral neuropathy, with no toxic deaths There has been one feasibility study evaluating the combination of Oxaliplatin and Gemcitabine in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium. Twenty patients with advanced urothelial carcinomas who were treated with Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin at 1500mg/m2 and 85mg/m2 IV respectively, both on day 1 of a 14 day cycle. The median number of cycles was 5 and ranged from 1 to 7. A total of 90 cycles were delivered with 87 assessable for toxicity in 19 patients. No neutropenic fever occurred and G-CSF was not used although allowed as needed. Grades 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 9 (10%) and 3 (3%) of the courses given respectively. Grades 1 to 2 neuropathy was noted to be common with only one patient suffering grade 3 neuropathy. Non-hematologic adverse effects were found to be mild. Response rates were not provided. In summary, there is favorable evidence of antitumor activity in vitro and in clinical studies for a variety of cancers. Furthermore, the toxicity profile of this combination is also favorable. It is therefore logical to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of this combination in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
Name: John P Fruehauf, MD, PhD
Affiliation: University of California, Irvine
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR