The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Dosimetric Planning Study Comparing Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and 4-field Radiotherapy for Definitive Treatment of Cancer of the Cervix
Official Title: Dosimetric Planning Study Comparing IMRT and 4-field Radiotherapy for Definitive Treatment of Cancer of the Cervix
Study ID: NCT00981552
Brief Summary: A theoretical planning study to compare the normal tissue irradiation when using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as opposed to standard radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of cervical cancer.
Detailed Description: Radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy is the standard treatment of locally advanced cervix cancer, however with traditional techniques large volumes of bowel and bladder are irradiated causing short-term and long-term genito-urinary and gastro-intestinal side effects. IMRT has the potential to conform precisely to the target and spare normal tissues and reduce side effects. However because there are large dose gradients there is the potential to miss the target due to organ motion. Recent studies have documented organ motion and will be used to define the target. Approximately 60 planning scans, previously used to treat patients with cervix cancer, will be used to replan using an IMRT technique and differences in doses to tumour and normal tissues compared.
Minimum Age:
Eligible Ages: CHILD, ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers: No
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Name: Gillian Thomas, MD
Affiliation: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR