Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Safety and Efficacy of Ambulatory Versus In-hospital Antibiotic Treatment in Children With Febrile Neutropenia

Study Description

Brief Summary: Febrile neutropenia (FN) continues to be the infectious complication that most commonly requires hospitalization in pediatric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. In recent years, data have been published on the effectiveness of treatment of FN events with oral antibiotics, mainly in developed countries, but data from developing countries continue to be scarce. Our hypothesis was that early change from initial in-patient intravenous antibiotic treatment to oral outpatient antibiotic treatment in children with cancer and FN is as safe and effective as in-patient intravenous antibiotic management. The purpose of this clinical study was to determine whether early outpatient oral antibiotic treatment is not inferior in safety and efficacy to in-hospital intravenous antibiotic treatment in pediatric patients with cancer and low-risk FN events. A multicenter, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted in three public hospitals in Mexico City. Low-risk FN events were identified in children aged 1 to 18 years. After 48 to 72 hours of receiving intravenous in-hospital antibiotics, children were randomly allocated to receive outpatient oral treatment (cefixime) or to continue in-hospital intravenous treatment (cefepime). Daily monitoring was performed until the resolution of neutropenia. Our outcome of interest was the presence of any unfavorable clinical outcome.

Detailed Description: Introduction: Febrile neutropenia (FN) continues to be the infectious complication that most commonly requires hospitalization in pediatric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Classically these patients have been managed as inpatient. In recent years, data have been published on the effectiveness of treatment of FN events with oral antibiotics, mainly in developed countries, but data from developing countries continue to be scarce. Hypothesis: Our hypothesis was that early change from initial in-patient intravenous antibiotic treatment to oral outpatient antibiotic treatment in children with cancer and FN is as safe and effective as in-patient intravenous antibiotic management. Objectives: The purpose of this clinical study was to determine whether early outpatient oral antibiotic treatment is not inferior in safety and efficacy to in-hospital intravenous antibiotic treatment in pediatric patients with cancer and low-risk FN events. Methodology: A multicenter, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted in three public hospitals in Mexico City. Low-risk FN events were identified in children aged 1 to 18 years. A complete medical history, physical examination and review of laboratory tests and cultures were performed on all subjects with FN events who were considered low risk. According to local guidelines for the treatment of FN, all subjects began receiving cefepime at a dose of 150 mg/kg/day. Subjects were followed-up daily, and those who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria after 48 to 72 hours of in-hospital intravenous treatment with cefepime were randomly assigned to receive outpatient treatment with oral cefixime at a dose of 8 mg/kg/day or to continue in-hospital intravenous treatment. The treatment was administered by the researchers. Participants in both treatment groups were evaluated daily by a complete physical examination. Subjects in the outpatient group were evaluated at the outpatient clinic of the hospital. All patients underwent a blood count every 48 to 72 hours. FN event resolution was defined as when the patient remained afebrile and the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) increased to above 500 per microliter. If fever resumed, the antibiotic regimen was modified. If the subjects were in the outpatient group, they were re-admitted to the hospital to receive intravenous antibiotics. Resolution of the FN event was defined as the end of participation of the subjects in the study, and they were followed up for an additional 72 hours. The occurrence of any of the following conditions was considered an unfavorable clinical outcome: 1) therapeutic failure, defined as the resumption of fever in a patient with persistent neutropenia. For all patients with resumption of fever, the antibiotic regimen was switched, and if the patients were in the outpatient treatment group, they were re-admitted to the hospital; 2) new focus of infection, documented both by the clinical condition and by laboratory and other diagnostic tests; 3) hemodynamic instability, defined as a decrease in blood pressure below the 5th percentile for the patient age that did not revert with the administration of crystalloid solutions; and 4) death. Sample size: The sample size was calculated to reject a null hypothesis of inferiority, with a non-inferiority margin of presentation of unfavorable clinical outcomes of 15%. A formula including a statistical power of 80% and a one-tailed alpha value of 0.025 was used to calculate the sample size of 2 independent proportions. Based on previous reports of 10% of unfavorable clinical outcomes during the management of FN events, the calculation yielded a total of 63 FN events per group for a total of 126 events. Randomization: A random sequence balanced by blocks of 4 FN events was generated using a computer program. A physician who did not participate in the subject selection assigned subjects to receive either outpatient oral treatment at home or to continue in-hospital intravenous treatment. If the subjects lived more than 1 hour away from the hospital, they were assigned to a care home to ensure that they could return to the hospital in case of any event. Because the study intervention involved outpatient treatment, the study was open. All patients were provided with the antibiotic free of charge. Statistical analysis: The focus of analysis was intention-to-treat. For each comparison group, measures of central tendency and dispersion were estimated for continuous variables, and absolute and relative frequencies were determined for discrete and nominal variables. The statistical test performed to test the hypothesis of non-inferiority is very similar to the traditional test for comparison of proportions; the only difference is that the non-inferiority margin is added to the formula, and a p-value \< 0.05 confirms non-inferiority. The statistical program STATA version 14.2 was used for the analysis.

Keywords

Eligibility

Minimum Age: 1 Year

Eligible Ages: CHILD, ADULT

Sex: ALL

Healthy Volunteers: No

Locations

Contact Details

Useful links and downloads for this trial