The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Irinotecan and Cetuximab With or Without Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With RAS Wild-Type Locally Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
Official Title: BOND-3: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial of Irinotecan, Cetuximab, and Bevacizumab Compared With Irinotecan, Cetuximab, and Placebo in RAS-Wildtype, Irinotecan-Refractory, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Study ID: NCT02292758
Brief Summary: This randomized phase II trial studies how well irinotecan and cetuximab with or without bevacizumab work in treating patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer that has spread to other places in the body (locally advanced/metastatic) and cannot be removed by surgery. Irinotecan may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab and bevacizumab, may help the body?s immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving irinotecan and cetuximab with or without bevacizumab may work betting in treating patients with colorectal cancer.
Detailed Description: PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess and compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients receiving irinotecan, cetuximab, and bevacizumab with patients receiving irinotecan, cetuximab and placebo, in the population of patients with RAS wild-type, irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who also previously received bevacizumab in at least one prior line therapy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the adverse event (AE) profile and safety of the proposed treatment in this population. II. To assess and compare the overall survival (OS) between treatment arms in this population. III. To assess and compare the disease control rate (DCR) between treatment arms in this population. IV. To assess and compare the overall response rate (ORR) between treatment arms in this population. V. To assess and compare the duration of response between treatment arms in this population. VI. To assess and compare time to treatment failure between treatment arms in this population. VII. To assess relative dose intensity of treatment agents between treatment arms in this population. CORRELATIVE OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the change in genotype concentrations of prespecified gene mutations in circulating cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (cfDNA) collected serially during protocol treatment. II. Explore the predictive value of pretreatment mutation status, germline single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and gene expression signatures for cetuximab sensitivity and resistance. III. Explore the predictive value of dynamic changes in mutation status and gene expression signatures for cetuximab sensitivity and resistance. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive cetuximab intravenously (IV) over 90-120 minutes, bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes, and irinotecan IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients receive cetuximab IV over 90-120 minutes, placebo IV over 30-90 minutes, and irinotecan IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 2 years.
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Saint Luke's Mountain States Tumor Institute, Boise, Idaho, United States
Siouxland Regional Cancer Center, Sioux City, Iowa, United States
Cancer Center of Kansas - Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, United States
Ochsner Medical Center Jefferson, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Michigan Cancer Research Consortium NCORP, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Heartland Regional Medical Center, Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States
Missouri Baptist Medical Center, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
New Hampshire Oncology Hematology PA-Hooksett, Hooksett, New Hampshire, United States
State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States
Saint Vincent Regional Cancer Center CCOP, Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States
Name: Kimmie Ng
Affiliation: Academic and Community Cancer Research United
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR