⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ "A total no brainer"

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ "Love this, so easy."

Spots is the easy way to track your skin, mole and cancer changes.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Colonoscopy Versus Fecal Immunochemical Test in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer (CONFIRM)

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: Colonoscopy Versus Fecal Immunochemical Test in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer (CONFIRM)

Official Title: CSP #577 - Colonoscopy vs. Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer

Study ID: NCT01239082

Interventions

Colonoscopy
FIT

Study Description

Brief Summary: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States, and one of the most preventable cancers. It has been shown in several randomized controlled trials that screening using fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) reduces CRC mortality by 13-33%. While there is strong consensus amongst experts regarding the value of CRC screening, the best approach to screening is not clear. Of the widely recommended modalities, FOBT and colonoscopy are the most commonly used within the United States. FOBT is inexpensive, non-invasive, and its use as a screening tool is supported by the highest quality evidence (i.e. randomized controlled trials). Moreover, newer FOBT, such as fecal immunochemical tests or FITs, have advantages over conventional FOBT in terms of both test characteristics and ease of use that make them quite attractive as a population-based screening tool. While colonoscopy is invasive and has higher up-front risks and costs than FOBT, it does afford the opportunity to directly assess the colonic mucosa and is widely believed to be the best test to detect colorectal cancer. In addition, colonoscopy allows for the detection and removal of colorectal adenomas -a well recognized colorectal cancer precursor. There is indirect evidence that suggests colonoscopy is effective in reducing colorectal cancer mortality, but to date, no large clinical trials have been completed to support this assumption. While colonoscopy use is increasing, data is emerging that colonoscopy may not be as effective as previously believed. Prior support for colonoscopy as a screening test relied upon effectiveness estimates that now appear to be overly optimistic. Given the invasive nature of colonoscopy, the associated small, but real risk of complications, and dramatically higher costs than other screening tests, it is especially important to determine the true comparative effectiveness of colonoscopy relative to other proven non-invasive options. The investigators propose to perform a, large, simple, multicenter, randomized, parallel group trial directly comparing screening colonoscopy with annual FIT screening in average risk individuals. The hypothesis is that colonoscopy will be superior to FIT in the prevention of colorectal cancer mortality measured over 10 years. Individuals will be enrolled if they are currently eligible for CRC screening (e.g. no colonoscopy in the past 10 years and no FOBT in the past 1 year) and are between 50 and 75 years of age. The investigators will exclude individuals for whom colonoscopy is indicated (e.g. signs or symptoms of CRC, first degree family member with CRC, personal history of colorectal neoplasia or inflammatory bowel disease). All participants will complete baseline demographic, medication, and lifestyle questionnaires (e.g. diet, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory use, frequency of exercise) prior to randomization in a 1:1 ratio to either screening colonoscopy or annual FIT screening (Figure 1). Those testing positive by FIT will undergo evaluation to determine appropriateness for colonoscopy. Screening will be performed in a manner consistent with the currently accepted standard of care in order to determine the comparative effectiveness of the two screening strategies. Participants will be surveyed annually to determine if they have undergone colonoscopy or been diagnosed with CRC. The primary study endpoint will be CRC mortality within 10 years of enrollment. The secondary endpoints are (1) the incidence of CRC within 10 years of enrollment and (2) major complications of colonoscopy. Mortality will be determined through queries of the VA Vital Status File. Cause of death will be determined primarily using death certificates from the National Death Index-Plus database, augmented by adjudication of medical records for known CRC cases where CRC is not listed as a cause of death on the death certificate. The investigators postulate that screening colonoscopy will result in a 40% reduction in CRC mortality over 10 years relative to annual FIT screening. Using a log-rank test with a 2-sided test of significance, =0.05, a sample size of 50,000 participants will be required to test the primary hypothesis with 82% power, assuming a 1% annual rate of crossover from FIT to colonoscopy and a 0.5% annual rate of loss to follow-up. The planned study duration is 12.5 years with 2.5 years of recruitment and 10 years of follow-up for all enrolled participants.

Detailed Description:

Keywords

Eligibility

Minimum Age: 50 Years

Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT

Sex: ALL

Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Locations

Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Central Arkansas VHS John L. McClellan Memorial Veterans Hospital, Little Rock, AR, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

VA Central California Health Care System, Fresno, CA, Fresno, California, United States

VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA, Loma Linda, California, United States

VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, Long Beach, California, United States

VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, San Diego, California, United States

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA, West Los Angeles, California, United States

VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, Denver, Colorado, United States

VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT, West Haven, Connecticut, United States

Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC, Washington, District of Columbia, United States

North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL, Gainesville, Florida, United States

Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL, Miami, Florida, United States

Orlando VA Medical Center, Orlando, FL, Orlando, Florida, United States

James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL, Tampa, Florida, United States

Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA, Decatur, Georgia, United States

VA Pacific Islands Health Care System, Honolulu, HI, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, Chicago, Illinois, United States

Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Robley Rex VA Medical Center, Louisville, KY, Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI, Detroit, Michigan, United States

Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, Kansas City, Missouri, United States

St. Louis VA Medical Center John Cochran Division, St. Louis, MO, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Manchester VA Medical Center, Manchester, NH, Manchester, New Hampshire, United States

East Orange Campus of the VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ, East Orange, New Jersey, United States

Northport VA Medical Center, Northport, NY, Northport, New York, United States

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, Durham, North Carolina, United States

Salisbury W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC, Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Oklahoma City VA Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, Portland, Oregon, United States

Philadelphia MultiService Center, Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Memphis VA Medical Center, Memphis, TN, Memphis, Tennessee, United States

VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX, Dallas, Texas, United States

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, Houston, Texas, United States

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

White River Junction VA Medical Center and Regional Office, White River Junction, VT, White River Junction, Vermont, United States

Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, Richmond, Virginia, United States

VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA, Seattle, Washington, United States

Clarksburg Louis A. Johnson VA Medical Center, Clarksburg, WV, Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States

William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, Madison, Wisconsin, United States

VA Caribbean Healthcare System, San Juan, PR, San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Contact Details

Name: Jason A. Dominitz, MD MHS

Affiliation: VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Name: Douglas J Robertson, MD MPH

Affiliation: White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Useful links and downloads for this trial

Clinicaltrials.gov

Google Search Results

Logo

Take Control of Your Skin and Body Changes Today.

Try out Spots for free, set up only takes 2 mins.

spots app storespots app store

Join others from around the world: