Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps

Official Title: Comparison of the Efficiency and Safety of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps

Study ID: NCT05825664

Conditions

Colorectal Polyp

Colorectal Neoplasms

Interventions

Endoscopic resection

Study Description

Brief Summary: A prospective, randomized, controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in removal of non-pedunculated colorectal polyps

Detailed Description: * Patients are undergone colonoscopy at the Endoscopy department of Ho Chi Minh City University Medical Center. * Randomize patients with non-pedunculated polyp of 10mm or larger in size into 2 interventional groups based on Random function of Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.0, including (1) Group 1: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and (2) Group 2: Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR). * The time of local recurrence assessment depends on the histopathology of polyps. Polyps with low grade dysplasia are followed up at 6 months, while polyps with high grade dysplasia are followed at 3 months. * Collecting variables which consist of primary and secodary outcomes.