The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
Official Title: Comparison of the Efficiency and Safety of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
Study ID: NCT05825664
Brief Summary: A prospective, randomized, controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in removal of non-pedunculated colorectal polyps
Detailed Description: * Patients are undergone colonoscopy at the Endoscopy department of Ho Chi Minh City University Medical Center. * Randomize patients with non-pedunculated polyp of 10mm or larger in size into 2 interventional groups based on Random function of Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.0, including (1) Group 1: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and (2) Group 2: Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR). * The time of local recurrence assessment depends on the histopathology of polyps. Polyps with low grade dysplasia are followed up at 6 months, while polyps with high grade dysplasia are followed at 3 months. * Collecting variables which consist of primary and secodary outcomes.
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city, Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam