Neoplasms

Blood and Lymph Conditions

Immune System Diseases

All Conditions

Rare Diseases

Lymphoma

Lymphoma, T-Cell

Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral

Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Lymphatic Diseases

Immunoproliferative Disorders

Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Lymphosarcoma

Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma

Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma

Participants applied 0.06% CD11301 gel (up to 500 mg per dose) topically once daily, 3 to 5 times per week, for cycle 1 and 2 i.e. 24 weeks.

Participants applied 0.03% CD11301 gel (up to 500 mg per dose) topically once daily, 3 to 5 times per week, for cycle 1 and 2 i.e. 24 weeks.

Participants applied placebo gel during cycle one followed by 0.03% CD11301 gel topically during cycle two once daily, 3 to 5 times per week, for 24 weeks.

Placebo

CD11301 0.03%

CD11301 0.06%

Galderma R&D

To assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics in participants treated with CD11301 gel vs. placebo for early stage CTCL (IA, IB, or IIA).

To assess the efficacy and safety of two concentrations (0.03% and 0.06%) of CD11301 gel in the treatment of early stage CTCL (stage IA, IB, or IIA) versus placebo.

A Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics Study of CD11301 for the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-centre, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-arm Phase 2 Trial to Assess Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of CD11301 0.03% and 0.06% Gel in the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL), Stages IA, IB and IIA

Overall response is defined as the number of participants that achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by mCAILS. The mCAILS assessment total was derived from components collected on the case report form (CRF). Target treated lesions (1-5 lesions) were rated in erythema (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), scaling (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), plaque elevation (0-3, where 0=no evidence and 3= marked elevation), and size (scale=0-18, where 0= no measurable area and 18= size of lesion \>300 centimeter \[cm\]\^2). These 4 ratings were summed to create subtotals, 1 per lesion. The final mCAILS assessment score was the sum of these subtotals. Total summation Score: 0-50 where higher score indicated higher severity. Complete response is defined as a 100% decrease from baseline i.e. score of '0' on the mCAILS scale. Partial response is defined as at least a 50%, but less than 100%, decrease from baseline.

OR is defined as the number of participants that achieved a complete response or partial response as assessed by mSWAT. mSWAT composite score involved the direct assessment of the BSA of each type of lesion (palm plus fingers of the participant= approximately 1% BSA) in each of 12 areas (Head, Neck, Anterior trunk, Arms, Forearms, Hands, Posterior trunk, Buttocks, Thighs, Legs, Feet, Groin) of the body, multiplying the sum of the BSA of each lesion type by a weighting factor (patch = 1, plaque = 2, and tumor = 3 or 4) and generating a sum of the subtotals of each lesion subtype. mSWAT score (0=no lesions; 400= lesions covering all areas). Complete response is defined as a 100% decrease from baseline. Partial response is defined as at least a 50%, but less than 100%, decrease from baseline, and with a tumor subscore of zero (no tumor).

Time to overall response (CR or PR) is the number of days from the start of drug application to the first documentation of objective response assessed by mCAILS Score. The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles were presented along with 95% confidence intervals using the log-log transformation. The mCAILS assessment total was derived from components collected on the case report form (CRF). Target treated lesions (1-5 lesions) were rated in erythema (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), scaling (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), plaque elevation (0-3, where 0=no evidence and 3= marked elevation), and size (scale=0-18, where 0= no measurable area and 18= size of lesion \>300 centimeter \[cm\]\^2). These 4 ratings were summed to create subtotals, 1 per lesion. The final mCAILS assessment score was the sum of these subtotals. Total summation Score: 0-50 where higher score indicated higher severity.

The duration of overall response (complete or partial) of the target treated lesions based on the mCAILS score was calculated in days as: (date of first non-response after responding) - (date of response) + 1. The mCAILS assessment total was derived from components collected on the case report form (CRF). Target treated lesions (1-5 lesions) were rated in erythema (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), scaling (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), plaque elevation (0-3, where 0=no evidence and 3= marked elevation), and size (scale=0-18, where 0= no measurable area and 18= size of lesion \>300 centimeter \[cm\]\^2). These 4 ratings were summed to create subtotals, 1 per lesion. The final mCAILS assessment score was the sum of these subtotals. Total summation Score: 0-50 where higher score indicated higher severity.

Progressive disease is defined as ≥ 25% increase in skin disease from baseline, or loss of response: in those with CR or PR, increase of skin score of greater than the sum of nadir plus 50% baseline score, Nadir is defined as the lowest skin score (best response).

Participants answered 30 questions as part of the Skindex-29 survey. A composite score and 3 sub scores were calculated from the results. Item 18 of the survey was not used in any scoring. First, answers to each item were given a numeric value: Never = 0; Rarely = 25; Sometimes = 50; Often = 75; All the time = 100. The items used to calculate each subscore were: Emotions: 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 15, 21, 23, 26, and 28 (10 items), Symptoms: 1, 7, 10, 16, 19, 24, and 27 (7 items), Functioning: 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 22, 25, 29, and 30 (12 items). The composite score is the average of the 3 sub scores ranging from 0 (no effect)-100 (maximum effect), higher score corresponds to lower quality of life.

Analysis was performed on safety population: randomized participants who applied the study medication at least once.

CD11301 Gel 0.06%

CD11301 Gel 0.03%

Total

Age, Continuous

Sex: Female, Male

Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)

Race (NIH/OMB)

Intent to treat (ITT) Population included all randomized participants.

Clinical Operations

ITT Population included all randomized participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Number of Participants Reported Overall Response (Complete and Partial) of Target Treated Lesions Based on Modified Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (mCAILS) Score at Week 12

Number of Participants Reported Overall Response (OR) of Target Treated Lesions Based on Modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) Score at Week 12

25th (95% CI)

50th (95% CI)

75th (95% CI)

Time to Participant's First Overall Response (Complete or Partial) of the Target Treated Lesions Based on the mCAILS Score

Duration of Overall Response (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on mCAILS Score

Time to Progressive Disease Using mSWAT

Week 12

Week 24

Week 36

ITT Population included all randomized participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and at specific category.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for A Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics Study of CD11301 for the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)

Trial Identification

Conditions

Interventions

Study Description

Keywords

Eligibility

Locations

Contact Details

Useful links and downloads for this trial