The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Comparison Between Double Tract Anastomosis and Esophagogastrostomy After Radical Proximal Gastrectomy
Official Title: Comparison Between Double Tract Anastomosis and Esophagogastrostomy After Radical Proximal Gastrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
Study ID: NCT03613142
Brief Summary: The patients with upper gastric cancer (cT1N0M0) or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (diameter less than 4 cm) will be enrolled into this study. Each of these patients will undergo radical proximal gastrectomy and be randomly allocated into one of the two groups, double tract anastomosis group or esophagogastrostomy group. The following data will be collected to compare the difference between the two reconstruction methods: the rate of reflux esophagitis, postoperative quality of life, economic expenditure, the safety of operation, postoperative recovery, postoperative nutrition status and oncological effect. Through the comprehensive analysis, the result of this study will elucidate the best of the reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy.
Detailed Description:
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
Name: Xin Ji, M.D.
Affiliation: Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR