The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Totally Robotic Versus Surgeon-Assisted Robotic Lung Resection For Early-Stage NSCLC
Official Title: Totally Robotic Versus Surgeon-Assisted Robotic Lung Resection For Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study ID: NCT06348030
Brief Summary: Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RTS) is safe and effective for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). During RTS, division, dissection, and sealing of lung tissue, bronchi, and blood vessels can be performed using handheld staplers with assistance from a bedside surgeon (Surgeon-Assisted), or totally robotically with robotic staplers and energy devices by the console surgeon (Totally Robotic). Totally Robotic lung resection enables the operating surgeon to perform the case independently, but its implication on costs and patient outcomes remains unknown. There also is, however, a lack of prospective research evaluating the costs of the two methods for dissection and vessel sealing in RTS. This RCT aims to evaluate the costs and perioperative patient outcomes of Totally Robotic lung resection using the Vessel Sealer Extend energy device (for vessels \<7mm) and the SureForm robotic stapler (Intervention) versus Surgeon-Assisted robotic lung resection using the Signia stapler (Control) during RTS for NSCLC using the da Vinci system.
Detailed Description:
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Name: Waël C Hanna, MDCM, MBA, FRCSC
Affiliation: St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR