The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: EUS-guided CDS vs ERCP as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Borderline Disease (CARPEDIEM-2 Trial)
Official Title: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage With Lumen-Apposing Stent vs Classical ERCP for First-line Therapy of Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction in Borderline Disease: An Open-label, Multicenter Randomized Trial (CARPEDIEM-2 Trial)
Study ID: NCT06375954
Brief Summary: The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate temporal delay (days) between biliary drainage (EUS-CDS vs ERCP as first line therapy) and chemotherapy start in patients with borderline distal malignant biliary obstruction.
Detailed Description: Ecoendoscopy-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) has been extended as a second line treatment in cases of ERCP failure in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). However, there are clinical trials which have compared it with ERCP as a first line treatment for MDBO in palliative patients, showing similar clinical and technical success and adverse events (AEs) rate between both techniques. Data about the benefit of this techique in borderline patients is still limited. A recent retrospective study (Janet J et al, Ann Surg Oncol 2023) which included borderline patients, found that EUS-CDS group had significantly less delay (days) between biliary drainage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy start than the ERCP group with fewer endoscopy and surgery AEs. Thus, our hypothesis is that EUS-CDS has benefits in terms of decreasing delay between biliary drainage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy start when compared to ERCP in MDBO in borderline patients.
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Name: Joan B Gornals, PhD
Affiliation: Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, SEED
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR