Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for PEEK Versus Metallic Attachment-retained Obturators

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: PEEK Versus Metallic Attachment-retained Obturators

Official Title: PEEK Versus Metallic Attachment-retained Obturators Regarding Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Study ID: NCT04778254

Conditions

Maxillary Neoplasms

Interventions

PEEK attachment retained obturator

metalic attachment retained obturator

conventional obturator

Study Description

Brief Summary: Patients' satisfaction evaluation and radiographic evaluation of the terminal abutments of attachment- retained maxillary obturators with metal framework versus milled PEEK framework in the management of maxillectomy cases.

Detailed Description: Eighteen participants were randomly divided into three parallel groups (n=6). Participants of PEEK group received attachment-retained obturators with milled PEEK framework, metal group received an attachment-retained obturator with metallic framework and conventional group received conventional clasp-retained obturators with metallic framework (Control group). Evaluation included radiographic evaluation and patients' satisfaction where two scales were followed in this study, including "The Obturator Functioning Scale" and "The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck 35" using one way ANOVA test.