Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for The Aim of This Study is to Demonstrat That Vacuum-assisted Closure Versus Conventional Wound Closure Enables to Diminish Local Complications After Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Metastatic Skin Tumors

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: The Aim of This Study is to Demonstrat That Vacuum-assisted Closure Versus Conventional Wound Closure Enables to Diminish Local Complications After Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Metastatic Skin Tumors

Official Title: Does PREVENA Vacuum-assisted Closure Reduce Lymphorrhoea Compared to Conventional Wound Closure After Axillary and Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in the Management of Metastatic Cutaneous Skin Tumors ?

Study ID: NCT04583605

Conditions

Melanoma

Skin Cancer

Epidermoid Carcinoma

Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Lymph Node Metastases

Interventions

PREVENA

Study Description

Brief Summary: In this study, we compared a negative pressure wound therapy, versus a conventional dressing in order to evaluate the most efficient wound therapy closure after axillary and inguinal lymph nodes dissections in the management of metastatic skin tumors. A vacuum assisted closure therapy should prevent these comorbidities.

Detailed Description: Lymphorrhoea, lymphedema and lymphocyte are significant and common complications after axillary and inguinal lymph nodes dissections. A vacuum assisted closure therapy should prevent these comorbidities. In this study, we compared PREVENA, a negative pressure wound therapy, versus conventional dressings. We evaluated the wound complications at the seventh day, the thirtieth day and at this end of the first year after surgery. It is a retrospective study of about ninety lymph nodes dissections among with there were seventy times the use of a negative pressure wound therapy, PREVENA.