The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: EURAD-MR Classification : European Multicenter Study
Official Title: European Multicenter Validation of an ADNEXMR SCORING System for Characterizing Adnexal Masses: "EURAD-MR Classification"
Study ID: NCT01738789
Brief Summary: An adnexal mass is the most common indication for gynaecological surgery . Pre operative characterization is crucial and a scoring system would be useful to standardize the imaging report and thus, improve patient management. Recently, our center developed the first MR scoring system named ADNEXMR SCORING system in a retrospective study which is accurate and reproducible (1). Our objectives are to perform an external prospective validation of this scoring system, to evaluate its potential impact on therapeutic strategy and to test its reproducibility. This is a prospective large multicenter study. All patients with a sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass referred for MR imaging will be consecutively included in each center. Then, patients will undergo a routine pelvic MR imaging. Prospectively, one senior and one junior radiologists independently analyze the different MR criteria to characterize adnexal masses. The MR report will be issued as standard and the patient will be managed accordingly. Then, the reader will classify the mass using ADNEXMR SCORING system. The classification will be compared to the reference standard as defined below. The reproducibility of the classification will be tested between the junior and the senior radiologist. After anonymisation, images will be analyzed by another senior radiologist of another center blinded from any clinical or ultrasonographical data and correlated with the reference standard. Reference standard: Reference standard will be surgical procedure with histology or standard clinical follow-up depending on most appropriate routine practice. Sample size: The sample size was computed to ensure a power of at least 90% (with a two-sided type I error rate of 5%) to conclude that SCORE 2 and 3 and SCORE 4 and 5 would have a different PPV. It would thus be necessary to have at least 569 patients classified as SCORE 2, 259 as SCORE 3, 52 as SCORE 4 and 51 as SCORE 5 (18). Given the prevalences, and assuming 6% of patients would be classified, as SCORE 1 and 10% would be lost to follow-up, 1340 patients will be included in this study to insure a probability of at least 95% to obtain the aforementioned number of patients in each score category. The inclusion period will last 18 months (extension for a period of 12 months) and monitoring will continue for 2 years. Thomassin Naggara I., et al. Development and preliminary validation of an MRI Scoring system for Adnexal Masses. Radiology 2013, May;267(2):432-43.
Detailed Description: All patients with an indeterminate ultrasonographically adnexal mass referred for MR imaging will be consecutively included in each center. Inclusion Criteria * Patient ≥ 18 years old * With indeterminate ultrasonographic adnexal mass * Informed consent Non inclusion Criteria * Pregnant women * Pacemaker, ferromagnetic materials, or foreign body at risk of mobilization * Intolerance to iodinated or gadolinium contrast agents, or severe renal insufficiency (GFR \<30 ml/min/1.73m²). Objectives • Primary objective: Evaluate if ADNEXMR SCORING system is relevant for reporting pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed for characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses in an external prospective multicenter study • Secondary objectives and endpoints: Evaluate 1. The potential impact of applying the score to the therapeutic strategy, in particular to measure the possible reduction in oncologic surgery in benign cases 2. If ADNEXMR SCORING system improves reproducibility of MR report for characterization of adnexal masses 3. If ADNEXMR SCORING system is as accurate if the radiologist is blinded from any clinical and ultrasonographic data Main endpoint Joint analysis of true negative and false negative rates according to ADNEXMR SCORING system as compared to the histological results (or follow-up outcome, see "reference standard", below) with an evaluation of the sensitivity and the specificity of the score
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers: No
University Institute of Radiology, Salzburg, , Austria
University Hospital Dubrav, Zagreb, , Croatia
Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, , France
Hopital de la Timone, Marseille, , France
Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, , France
Hopital de Lapeyronie, Montpellier, , France
Tenon Hospital, Paris, , France
Centre imagerie Pyramides, Paris, , France
Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, , France
Hopital Lariboisière, Paris, , France
Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, , France
Institut Curie - Huguenin, Paris, , France
Hopital de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, , France
Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, , France
Umberto I hospital Sapienza, Roma, , Italy
Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, , Portugal
Instituto Portuges de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, , Portugal
Clinical Center of Vojvodine, Novi Sad, , Serbia
University Hodpital Dubrav, Baden, , Switzerland
Addenbrokes hospital, Cambridge, , United Kingdom
Barts Health NHS trust, London, , United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare, London, , United Kingdom
University College London, London, , United Kingdom
Steeping Hill hospital, Stockport, , United Kingdom
Name: Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, MD, PhD
Affiliation: Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Name: Andrea Rockall, MD
Affiliation: Imperial College of London
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Name: Marc Bazot, MD
Affiliation: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR