The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Laparoscopic vs Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Official Title: A Multicenter Randomized Study to Investigate the Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Study ID: NCT03682146
Brief Summary: This randomized trial was designed to address the lack of high-quality literature comparing robotic-assisted (RARP) and laparoscopic (LRP) radical prostatectomy (RP). Purpose: The LAP-01 trial compares outcomes between RARP and LRP.
Detailed Description: LAP-01 is the first multicenter, prospective randomized, patient-blinded controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The investigation include an extensive evaluation of clinical, oncological, functional and quality of life related data by means of validated patient-reported outcome measures. The primary outcome is the assessment of time to continence restoration at 3 months. This is evaluated by an assessment of a pad diary completed daily by each patient from the time of catheter removal until restoration of continence. Secondary endpoints include continence and erectile function, as well as quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-PR25), patient satisfaction and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery in addition to oncological outcomes up to 3 years follow-up. With 782 enrolled patients it is the largest trial carried out till date on this topic.
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: MALE
Healthy Volunteers: No
Klinikum Dortmund, Dortmund, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, , Germany
University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, , Germany
University of Leipzig, Leipzig, , Germany
Name: Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Prof.
Affiliation: Leipzig University, Department of Urology
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR