Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Cosmetic Appeal, HRQoL and Effectiveness of Simple and Pseudotesticular Techniques of Orchidectomy in Prostate Cancer

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: Cosmetic Appeal, HRQoL and Effectiveness of Simple and Pseudotesticular Techniques of Orchidectomy in Prostate Cancer

Official Title: Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction of Three Techniques of Bilateral Orchidectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients of a Nigerian Sub-population (TEPSO)

Study ID: NCT03744494

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Quality of Life

Orchiectomy

Interventions

Bilateral simple orchidectomy (BSO)

Bilateral Subcapsular Orchidectomy

Bilateral Epididymal-sparing Orchidectomy

Study Description

Brief Summary: The therapeutic efficacy of three types of orchidectomy was ascertained as well as the QoL and scrotal cosmetic satisfaction of patients in the three surgical arms. Two of these surgeries produced a pseudotesticle (BSCO, BESO) while one (BSO) did not.

Detailed Description: Patients with prostate cancer (PCa) were grouped into three surgical arms: BSO (bilateral simple orchidectomy), BSCO (bilateral subcapsular orchidectomy) and BESO (bilateral epididymal-sparing orchidectomy). Preoperatively, baseline serum testosterone, PSA, Quality of life (QoL) and pre-operative testicular volumes were obtained. Timed interval sampling for serum testosterone and PSA variation was done post-operatively. By three months post-op, the cosmetic appeal of the scrotal appearance, post-operative pseudotesticular volumes and QoL were also assessed. The therapeutic efficacy of the surgeries was determined by the rates of decline of serum testosterone and PSA, as well as the nadirs achieved. The variations in the pre-and post-operative QoL was analysed.