Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Hepatectomy Versus Chemoembolization for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria

Study Description

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to compare the survival outcomes between hepatic resection and transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) used as the initial treatment in patients with Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria.

Detailed Description: For patients with large/multiple, and resectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread, the choice of treatment remains largely controversial. For these patients, transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as a palliative therapy. On the other hand, many authors still believe that hepatic resection is the only potential curative treatment in these patients because it is still feasible to remove all macroscopic tumors safely at surgery. With advances in surgical techniques, more large/multiple HCCs are now resectable, and long-term results have been reported that ranged from 30% to 58% at 5 years; even patients with large bilobar multiple HCC could reach a survival rate of more than 20% at 5 years after hepatic resection. Until now, there have been only a few studies that compared the outcomes of hepatic resection and TACE in the treatment of multiple HCCs, and these have reported controversial results. Some studies showed that hepatic resection had survival benefi t over TACE, but other studies showed the opposite result ( 11-15 ). Therefore, the investigators performed this prospective study in consecutive patients with large/multiple, and resectable HCCs to compare the outcomes in patients who underwent hepatic resection or TACE as the initial treatment.

Keywords

Eligibility

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT

Sex: ALL

Healthy Volunteers: No

Locations

Contact Details

Useful links and downloads for this trial