⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ "A total no brainer"

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ "Love this, so easy."

Spots is the easy way to track your skin, mole and cancer changes.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Official Title: Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Study ID: NCT02706171

Interventions

CyberKnife

Study Description

Brief Summary: This study is evaluating treatment with CyberKnife for soft tissue sarcomas.

Detailed Description: Because of these possible advantages of SBRT over conventional radiation, the investigators began a small pilot study to test this new treatment technique in the setting of resectable soft tissue sarcomas. The pilot study was planned for a total of 12 patients which was felt to be a good number to gauge if further expansion of this technology would be successful. As of 2/6/2015 13 participants have enrolled (two enrolled patients declined treatment on protocol and thus a total of 11 patients have been treated on protocol). As of this time, the investigators have not had seen Grade 3 or higher toxicity and no instance of local failure. There have been several distant failures which would not be related to local therapy like SBRT and if anything, SBRT should reduce instance of distant failure by shortening time to chemotherapy. The following represents the initial experience for SBRT for STS (from manuscript submitted for publication). Note that on the below abstract 8 participants were treated on the pilot study while 5 participants were treated prior to pilot study opening (the one instance of local failure is from patient treated pre-protocol). In terms of patient numbers the goal is to have 33 patients in cohorts one and two. Using historical controls of late toxicity rates of 40% and late toxicity rates in the initial population of 20% with an alpha of 0.1 (which is reasonable for phase II studies, an alpha of 0.05 is typical for phase III studies) there would be 80% power to detect a difference with 33 patients. The expectation for this phase II study includes the following 1. Late toxicity 30% or less 2. Local control rates 90% or better These numbers are based on historical controls and previous research. Local control rates for historical series have been 90% or better and this also held true in the initial phase II study. For late toxicity rates, historical controls are 35-43% (The NCI study that used similar wound complication definitions to us and was a well powered study had a wound complication rate of 43%). The investigators feel that for this study to be promising enough for large phase III non-inferiority studies that the current phase II study should have late toxicity rates of 30% or better and local control rates of 90% or better.

Keywords

Eligibility

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT

Sex: ALL

Healthy Volunteers: No

Locations

MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Camden, New Jersey, United States

Contact Details

Useful links and downloads for this trial

Clinicaltrials.gov

Google Search Results

Logo

Take Control of Your Skin and Body Changes Today.

Try out Spots for free, set up only takes 2 mins.

spots app storespots app store

Join others from around the world: