Neoplasms

Respiratory Tract (Lung and Bronchial) Diseases

All Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Respiratory Tract Neoplasms

Thoracic Neoplasms

Lung Diseases

Respiratory Tract Diseases

Central Nervous System Depressants

All Drugs and Chemicals

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents

Channel Blockers

Adjuvants, Anesthesia

Psychotropic Drugs

Analgesics

Anesthetics

Lidocaine

Midazolam

Propofol

Alfentanil

Anesthetics, Local

Sodium Channel Blockers

Diuretics, Potassium Sparing

Hypnotics and Sedatives

Anesthetics, Intravenous

Anesthetics, General

Anti-Anxiety Agents

GABA Modulators

Neurotransmitter Agents

Analgesics, Opioid

Narcotics

propofol

midazolam

alfentanil

lidocaine

Andre GS Leite, PhD

The objective of the study was to establish which anesthetic procedure used during flexible bronchoscopy has the lowest index of complications.

This prospective randomized study analyzed 80 patients that underwent flexible bronchoscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to four groups of 20 patients each according to the anesthetic combination used: 200 mg topical lidocaine (LID group); 200 mg topical lidocaine and 2 mg/kg propofol (PPF group); 200 mg topical lidocaine and 20 mcg/kg alfentanil (ALF group); or 200 mg topical lidocaine and 0.05 mg/kg midazolam (MID group). Scores were assigned to patients according to the different variables observed during the endoscopic procedure; the lower the score, the lower the complication index.

Anesthesia in Flexible Bronchoscopy for Lung Cancer Diagnostic

Hospital Pompeia

Heroin

Hospice in-patients who require subcutaneous strong opioid administration will be given alfentanil

Hospice in-patients who require strong opioids will be given diamorphine

Titrated to a maximum dose of 50mg in 24 hours subcutaneously

Titrated to a maximum dose of 500mg in 24 hours given subcutaneously

Diamorphine

Paul Perkins, MBBCh FRCP

OBJECTIVES:

How does Alfentanil compare with the standard drug Diamorphine for subcutaneous analgesia in the palliative care setting?

STUDY DESIGN:

An open-label pilot comparison between alfentanil and diamorphine for palliative care patients who require subcutaneous opioids.

STUDY DESIGN

Study 1 - Open Label Pilot Day - 1 Hospice in-patients who are thought by a clinician to need subcutaneous strong opioids will be asked if they wish to take part in the study.

They will be given a patient information leaflet and a 'cooling off period' (a minimum of 1 day) to think about it. If the clinician feels that strong parenteral opioids are needed diamorphine will be commenced immediately (as standard practice).

Day 0 If the patient agrees to take part in the trial they will be asked to complete a consent form and this will be stored with the patient's notes.

The following assessments will be performed:

1. McGill Pain Questionnaire Short Form(MPQ-SF)
2. Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)These measures were recommended by an EAPC Expert Working Group for pain syndrome characterization
3. Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). This has been validated in an advanced cancer population and used recently with hospice in-patients.
4. Nausea Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
5. Nausea Duration over last 24 hours
6. Number of vomits in previous 24 hours

Randomisation Once baseline measures are completed the participant will be randomised using the next available of a series of numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. These will be prepared remotely. Blocking will be used to prevent an imbalance in terms of the number allocated to each group. Block size will be appropriate to the size of the study and not be divulged to the investigators responsible for consent and revealing the allocation. This will reduce the risk of investigators anticipating the allocation for particular patients. A study log will be kept on site where participant details will be completed before the envelope is opened.

Subsequent Days

On each subsequent day the following assessments will be performed:

1. BPI-SF
2. MDAS
3. Nausea VAS
4. Number of vomits in previous 24 hours

   In addition the following measurements will be taken:
5. Stool chart for previous 24 hours
6. Breakthrough medication (number of doses and dosage) used
7. Laxatives taken
8. Other changes to medication

Patients will cease participation after assessment on day 7.

Diamorphine or Alfentanil for Subcutaneous Use in Hospice In-patients?

An Open-label Pilot Comparison Between Alfentanil and Diamorphine for Palliative Care Patients Who Require Subcutaneous Opioids

The change in MDAS will be calculated from day 0 to day 7 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.

The change in BPI-SF will be calculated from day 0 to day 3 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.

The change in BPI-SF will be calculated from day 0 to day 7 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.

The difference in proportion of patients taking laxatives will be compared between the two groups using the confidence interval on the difference of two proportions.

The change in nausea visual analogue scale will be calculated from day 0 to day 3 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.

The change in number of vomits will be calculated from day 0 to day 3 and compared between the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.

The change in nausea visual analogue scale will be calculated from day 0 to day 7 and compared betwen the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-WhitneyU test otherwise

The change in number of vomits will be calculated from day 0 to day 7 and compared betwen the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise.

The change in the total dosage of breakthrough medication will be calculated from day 0 to day 3 and compared betwen the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-WhitneyU test otherwise

The change in the total dosage of breakthrough medication will be calculated from day 0 to day 7 and compared betwen the two groups using a t-test if the data are sufficiently normally distributed, or the Mann-WhitneyU test otherwise

Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Chief Investigator

Symptoms and General Pathology

Pain

Patients in this arm will undergo SVP insertion in local anesthesia (LA)

Patients in this arm will undergo SVP insertion in local anesthesia and PCS (LA+PCS)

In addition to LA, patients in the study group are able to self-administer a combination of propofol and alfentanil using a patient-controlled sedation pump. The pump enables the patient via a hand-held button to trigger the release of a single bolus of 0.5ml containing 4.5mg propofol and 25µg alfentanil under an 10second period. This results in a maximal possible amount of 6 bolus doses per minute.

Propofol + Alfentanil

Stefanie Seifert

Knut Taxbro

The goal of the study is to determine if patient-controlled sedation (PCS) with propofol and alfentanil reduces patient-reported pain perception during implantation of subcutaneous venous port (SVP).

The main question it aims to answer: How much pain did you (patient) experience during SVP-implantation Several other questions will be answered regarding: patient´s perception of the procedure, complication rate, procedure data.

The study contains two groups which will be compared. Control group: will do SVP implantation under local anaesthesia Study group: will do SVP implantation under local anaesthesia and patient-controlled sedation.

The patients are asked to complete a questionnaire postoperatively which contains questions on pain perception and satisfaction.

The study is an open multicentre randomized controlled trial with a study and a control arm in a 1:1 ratio. Patients will be randomized to either a control arm of LA for SVP-implantation or a study arm of PCS with propofol and alfentanil as adjunct to LA for SVP-implantation. The aim is to randomize 340 patients with an estimated patient recruitment over 18 months with a following 6 months of data cleaning and analysis. The trial will be performed at two centres; County Hospital Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden and University Hospital Linköping, Sweden. SVP implantation procedure and perioperative time period is estimated to 2-4 hours. The primary endpoint is assessment of patients´ self-reported pain perception. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, implantation conditions, sedation level, sedative and analgesic medication consumption, procedural time consumption as well as safety aspects, adverse events and estimation of perioperative experience. Participation in the trial ends after telephone inquiry one day postoperatively.

Control arm:

SVP-implantation in LA:

Subcutanous venous ports were introduced in 1981. A SVP is a small device around 3cm in diameter with an injectable membrane buried just under the skin. It is connected to a thin tube with its tip in a large bore vein. Access to the SVP is achieved by puncturing the skin with a needle.

Local anaesthetic causes the absence of pain sensation in the location where applied by decreasing the rate of depolarization and repolarization of excitable membranes such as nociceptors and nerves. The most commonly used solutions are from the amide group differing in pharmacokinetics. In order to reduce a burning sensation on infiltration substances can be combined with sodium bicarbonate. There will be no restrictions in the choice of LA-solution being left up to local practice at participating sites. With the beginning of the procedure LA is subcutaneously applied to patients in both groups. LA used at participating centres are Mepivacaine 10mg/ml, 20-40ml subcutaneously or Lidnocaine 10mg/ml, 20-40 ml subcutaneously.

Study arm:

SVP-implantation in LA and PCS:

In addition to LA, patients in the study group are able to self-administer a combination of propofol and alfentanil using a patient-controlled sedation pump. The pump enables the patient via a hand-held button to trigger the release of a single bolus of 0.5ml containing 4.5mg propofol and 25µg alfentanil under an 10 second period. This results in a maximal possible amount of 6 bolus doses per minute.

Propofol is a short-acting anaesthetic agent commonly used for general anaesthesia and procedural sedation. Several mechanisms of action have been proposed both through potentiation of GABAA receptor activity and in higher doses behaving as GABAA receptor agonist. When used for intravenous sedation a single dose wears off within minutes demanding for continuous or intermittent application.

Alfentanil is a short-acting synthetic opioid analgesic agent with rapid onset of effects at µ-opioid receptors. These properties make it suitable to provide analgesia for brief procedures and to infuse for longer procedures and yet provide relatively rapid recovery.

Rescue sedation will be available to patients in both groups on the patient´s or operator´s demand. Rescue sedation consists of propofol and alfentanil administered by the clinician and is documented in the e-CRF.

Setting:

This trial will be carried out in the following anaesthesia departments:

OP/IVA clinic, County Hospital Ryhov, Sweden AnOpIVA clinic, University Hospital Linköping, Sweden

Participants will be instructed on use of the PCS pump (Syramed µSP6000, Arcomed AG, Switzerland) by a nurse anesthetist. The syringe is loaded with 36 ml propofol (10 mg/ml) and 4 ml alfentanil (0.5 mg/ml). Each time the patient presses the handheld button, an aliquot of 0.5 ml is injected (4.5 mg propofol/0.025 mg alfentanil). The injection time is set to 10 s, restricting self-administration to a maximum of 6 bolus doses per minute corresponding to 27 mg propofol and 0.15 mg alfentanil per minute. No lockout period is applied. Local anaesthesia is injected in the operating site. Vital parameters prior to the procedure are recorded. Patients are monitored using electrocardiography for heartrate (HR), non-invasive blood pressure (BP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and respiratory rate (RR) at 5-min intervals during the procedure. Bradycardia is defined as HR \<40 beats/min, tachycardia as HR \>100 beats/min, hypotension as systolic BP \< 90 mmHg or a decrease of \>30% from baseline, hypoxia as SpO2 \<90% or a decrease of \>5% from baseline, and bradypnea as RR of \<8 breaths per minute. Supplemental oxygen via a capnograph-fitted nasal cannula is administered to all patients at 2 L/min during the procedure. The Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score (OAA/S) \[9\] is used to determine the sedation level during the four procedural steps: 1) sterile swabbing, 2) injection of LA, 3) catheter tunneling, and 4) sterile drape removal. The operating anesthesiologist assesses the operating conditions on a 4 point scale with 1 enabling the operator to perform the procedure without time delay and 4 having to abort the procedure. Puncture attempt is defined as continuous needle advancement to establish vein puncture. An unvalidated patient perception assessment tool with seven dimensions applying the NRS is used to evaluate patient perception. QoR-15 will be measured att 3 timepoints. Preoperatively, postoperatively before patient discharge and one day postoperatively.

Patient-Controlled Sedation in Port Implantation (PACSPI-2)

Patient-Controlled Sedation in Port Implantation (PACSPI-2) -a Randomized Controlled Trial

All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be available for sharing on request

NRS Participants assessment of maximal pain level experienced during the procedure using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain I know) on patient questionnaire.

NRS Participants assessment of overall satisfaction experienced during the procedure using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not satisfied at all, 10=very satisfied) on patient questionnaire

Respiratory and circulatory complications as well as mechanical complications during the procedure bradycardia: defined as heart \< 40/minutes during the procedure Hypoxia: defined as Oxygen saturation \<90% or significant drop from baseline (\>5% SaO2 drop) during the procedure Airway intervention: defined as intervention by staff with chin lift during the procedure bradypnea: defined as respiratory rate \<8/minute during the procedure

Sedation levels according to Observers Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale 5: responds readily to naame spoken in normal tone 4: responds lethargically to name spoken in normal tone 3: responds only after name is called loudly, repeatedly, or both 2: responds only after mild prodding or shaking

1: responds only after painful trapezius squeeze 0: does not respond to painful trapezius squeeze

Quality of Recovery according to QoR-15 Have you had any of the following in the last 24 hours? 10 to 0, where: 10 = none of the time \[excellent\] and 0 = all of the time \[poor\])

1. Able to breathe easily
2. Been able to enjoy food
3. Feeling rested
4. Have had a good sleep
5. Able to look after personal
6. Able to communicate with family or friends
7. Getting support from hospital doctors and nurses
8. Able to return to work or usual home activities
9. Feeling comfortable and in control
10. Having a feeling of general well-being
11. Moderate pain
12. Severe pain
13. Nausea or vomiting
14. Feeling worried or anxious
15. Feeling sad or depressed

Participants assessment of the importance of receiving sedatives and being in control of sedation on a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not important, 10=very important) on patient questionnaire

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Anesthesia in Flexible Bronchoscopy for Lung Cancer Diagnostic	NCT00440960	Lung Cancer	propofol midazolam alfentanil lidocaine	18 Years -	Hospital Pompeia
Diamorphine or Alfentanil for Subcutaneous Use in Hospice In-patients?	NCT01049672	Cancer	Alfentanil Diamorphine	18 Years -	Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Patient-Controlled Sedation in Port Implantation (PACSPI-2)	NCT05688384	Pain Patient Satisfa... Cancer Venous Puncture	Propofol + Alfe...	18 Years - 110 Years	Region Jönköping County

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for alfentanil

Every month we try and update this database with for alfentanil cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for alfentanil

Every month we try and update this database with for alfentanil cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them. We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Every month we try and update this database with for alfentanil cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.