Neoplasms

All Conditions

Digestive System Diseases

Rare Diseases

Carcinoma

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

Anus Neoplasms

Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Neoplasms, Squamous Cell

Rectal Neoplasms

Colorectal Neoplasms

Intestinal Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Digestive System Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Intestinal Diseases

Anus Diseases

Rectal Diseases

Anal Cancer

Conventional photon radiation is delivered by volumetric arc therapy/intensity modulated radiotherapy/helical tomotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. The total dose to the primary tumour target and node metastases \>2 cm is 57.5 Gy in 27 fractions, one fraction/day, five fractions/week during 5.5 weeks. Node metastases up to 2 cm will receive 50.5 Gy in 27 fractions. Elective lymph nodes will receive a total dose of 41.6 Gy.

Proton radiation is delivered by spot scanning. Proton plans will be produced by single field optimisation/single field uniform dose or multifield optimisation/intensity modulated proton therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. The total dose to the primary tumour target and node metastases \>2 cm is 57.5 Gy(RBE) in 27 fractions, one fraction/day, five fractions/week during 5.5 weeks. Node metastases up to 2 cm will receive 50.5 Gy(RBE) in 27 fractions. Elective lymph nodes will receive a total dose of 41.6 Gy(RBE).

Proton radiotherapy

Photon radiotherapy

Björn U Zackrisson, MD

Martin P Nilsson, MD

Birgitta Lindh, MD

Björn U Zackrisson, Prof

Dosimetric studies suggest that radiotherapy with protons has a potential to reduce side effects compared to treatment with photons for patients with anal carcinoma (AC). There are so far no studies comparing these treatment techniques in a randomised setting. The aim of this study is to compare side effects following photon therapy versus proton therapy within the framework of a randomised controlled trial.

Anal carcinoma is a disease in which modern therapy is reasonably successful in achieving tumour control/cure. Both acute and late side effects are substantial. Proton radiotherapy is hypothesised to have the potential to decrease the incidence/severity of some acute side effects from certain organs at risk e.g. bone marrow and intraperitoneal bowel. By sparing the dose to these organs it is also possible that late effects might be less evident. Sparing of the bone marrow may lead to fewer septic events and dose reductions of chemotherapy which may, as a consequence, improve tumour control. The primary aim of this study is to find ways to decrease acute side effects primarily to alleviate some discomfort from the patient during and after a usually painful treatment experience. It has also been concluded by others that reduction of acute side effects is a relevant aim and end point for the evaluation of new treatment techniques and both patient reported and physician reported data are assessed

The study is an open label, multi-centre, randomised phase II study. 100 patients with anal carcinoma (including carcinoma of the perianal skin) will be randomised in 1:1 ratio to treatment delivered with photons or protons

Proton Versus Photon Therapy in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Proton Versus Photon Therapy in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Swedish Anal Carcinoma Study

Data may be made available upon request from other researchers to the study group

Costs and QoL as well as clinical outcome measured as survival time will be considered. The results of the health-economic part of the study will be expressed as cost per quality adjusted life years (QALYs) saved of one intervention in comparison with the other.

All relevant costs should be identified, quantified, and valued. Also indirect costs related to loss of production when patients cannot work due to the disease.

All types of resources associated with the two treatment arms during the follow-up should be considered. E.g. costs for treatment of side-effects, costs for surgery when performed, and travelling costs for patients. Costing will be performed at the end of the study.

For evaluation and analysis of the study results, a relatively simple health-economic model will be developed. This model will be used for evaluation of the two treatment arms from inclusion into the study until 5 years of follow up or death.

Acute hematological side effects will be assessed by weekly full blood cell counts during radiotherapy and the first three weeks after treatment completion. Side Grade \>2 acute GI and haematological side-effects during therapy and up to three weeks after the end of treatment. Thereafter, every six weeks for up to three months after treatment. Results will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NTCAE) v5.0 scoring system.

Haematological adverse events will also be assessed by registering febrile episodes during an after treatment as well as the frequency of chemotherapy dose reduction or delayed chemotherapy.

Acute side-effects from the gastrointestinal tract are assess the NTCAE v5.0 scoring system by using. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), disease specific quality of life questionnaire for anal cancer, (QLQ-ANL27).

During radiotherapy, daily reported symptoms will be investigated by a newly developed symptom scale, Radiotherapy related symptom assessment scale (RSAS). The questionnaire includes 13 items specific for current diagnose. The RSAS is a validated instrument for assessing symptom intensity and distress in patients with different cancer disease undergoing radiotherapy, with psychometric properties within the expected range. Answering categories ranges from not at all to a great deal (1-4).

Acute side-effects from skin are assessed by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NTCAE) v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27.

During radiotherapy, daily reported symptoms will be investigated by a newly developed symptom scale, Radiotherapy related symptom assessment scale (RSAS). The questionnaire includes 13 items specific for current diagnose. The RSAS is a validated instrument for assessing symptom intensity and distress in patients with different cancer disease undergoing radiotherapy, with psychometric properties within the expected range. Answering categories ranges from not at all to a great deal (1-4).

Acute side-effects from the genitourinary tract are assessed by scoring of genitourinary symptoms, pain by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NTCAE) v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27.

During radiotherapy, daily reported symptoms will be investigated by a newly developed symptom scale, Radiotherapy related symptom assessment scale (RSAS). The questionnaire includes 13 items specific for current diagnose. The RSAS is a validated instrument for assessing symptom intensity and distress in patients with different cancer disease undergoing radiotherapy, with psychometric properties within the expected range. Answering categories ranges from not at all to a great deal (1-4).

Pain is assessed by using the NTCAE v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported pain is assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27.

During radiotherapy, daily reported symptoms will be investigated by a newly developed symptom scale, Radiotherapy related symptom assessment scale (RSAS). The questionnaire includes 13 items specific for current diagnose. The RSAS is a validated instrument for assessing symptom intensity and distress in patients with different cancer disease undergoing radiotherapy, with psychometric properties within the expected range. Answering categories ranges from not at all to a great deal (1-4).

Late side effects 1, 2 and 5 years after completion of treatment. Side effects from the gastrointestinal system, are assessed by using the NTCAE v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the EORTCs disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27.

Late side effects 1, 2 and 5 years after completion of treatment. Side effects from the genitourinary system are assessed by using the NTCAE v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the EORTCs disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27.

Late side effects 1, 2 and 5 years after completion of treatment. Side effects from the skin are assessed by using the NTCAE v5.0 scoring system. Patient reported side effects are assessed by the EORTCs disease specific questionnaire, QLQ-ANL27.

Patient reported quality of life during and after treatment assessed by • HRQoL will be investigated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire, the QLQ-C30, supplemented by the disease specific module (anal-cancer) QLQ-ANL27. • EuroQol (EQ-5D) is a generic QoL instrument designed for self-administration. The result could be expressed as a weight with values between zero and one (0-1). Together with information about survival the QoL weight can be expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

Frequency of complete tumour regression after primary treatment

Time from randomisation until first recurrence, local and/or regional

Time from randomisation until first recurrence, local/regional/systemic or death

Region Västerbotten

Umeå University

This group will receive standard nutritional guidance from the institutional routine and prebiotics in combination with probiotics, starting one week before the start of Ch-RT and daily throughout the treatment up to 6 to 8 weeks post Ch-RT at the time of evaluation response (primary outcome).

This group will lead nutritionally based just before starting Ch-RT.

Administration of prebiotics in combination with probiotics before the start of Ch-RT

prebiotics in combination with probiotics

Rachel SP Riechelmann, MD

Mauro DS Donadio, MD

Rachel SP Riechelmann, Phd

Mauro DS Donadio, Dr

Phase II randomized study of the use of pre-and probiotics during the definitive treatment of chemotherapy-radiotherapy (Ch-RT) for patients with localized anal canal squamous cell cancer (ACSCC) with the objective of increasing the effectiveness of conventional treatment based on the assumptions of that there is a need for research that increases the cure rates of the definitive treatment of Ch-RT in the ACSCC; ACSCC is a virus-associated tumor in many cases and therefore potentially immunogenic; immunotherapy is a promising strategy in ACSCC; and that pre- and probiotics can stimulate the immune system through modulation of the intestinal microbiota, and improve oncological outcomes.

Although anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (ACSCC) is rare in developed countries, it has shown an annual increase of 4% in its incidence in Brazil, and according to data from the Oncocenter Foundation of São Paulo (FOSP), 2,338 cases were diagnosed in 2000 and 2016.

The standard treatment for localized ACSCC (without distant metastases) is definitive chemo-radiotherapy (Ch-RT) concomitant with administration of a fluoropyrimidine (5FU or capecitabine) combined with mitomycin or cisplatin, which provides cure rates of 60-80 % depending on the staging. When there is no complete remission, surgical rescue through anal amputation is the only potentially curative modality. However, this strategy is associated with great morbidity, besides negative emotional and social impacts, with consequent reduction of quality of life. Therefore, interventions that may increase the chance of cure in ACSCC should be investigated.

The main risk factors for ACSCC are human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and immunosuppression, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Chronic HPV infection and HIV-induced immunosuppression point to research strategies that strengthen the immune system to reduce the risk of developing ACSCC. In the metastatic setting, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed death protein-1 (PD1) antibodies, were shown to be promising in ACSCC patients, promoting response rates of approximately 25%. However, there is no evidence of modulation interventions of the immune system in patients with localized ACSCC.

Recently, studies have shown that the composition of the intestinal microbiota influences the onset of colorectal cancer, and may even disrupt the effects of chemotherapy in this neoplasm. A preclinical study in animal model showed that E. coli impaired the antitumor effect of fluoropyrimidines, drug used in colorectal cancer and ACSCC. The intestinal microbiota also participates in a large set of metabolic processes (such as reduction, hydrolysis, dehydroxylation, etc.) involved in drug metabolism. For example, some intestinal bacteria have β-glucuronidases that cleave glucuronide from the inactive metabolite of irinotecan (SN-38G), a drug used in gastrointestinal tumors, releasing active metabolite (SN38) in the intestine, causing diarrhea and colitis. Ciprofloxacin has been shown to inhibit this enzyme by suppressing the diarrhea associated with irinotecan in an experimental model of mice. Mycoplasma hyorhinis encodes a thymidine phosphorylase that strongly restricts the cytostatic activity of pyrimidine nucleoside analogues.

On the other hand, the replacement of the intestinal microbiota "carcinogenic" (Fusobacterium spp and Bacteriodes fragilis) by a protective microbiota (Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) has been the reason of numerous investigations with prebiotics and probiotics. According to the International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics, probiotics are composed of living organisms which, when administered, promote health benefits, such as antimicrobial action against intestinal pathogens, modulation of the immune system, reduction of cholesterol levels, reduction of colitis and prevention of colorectal cancer. Kefir is an example of probiotic. Already prebiotics are inert ingredients that promote alteration in the composition or activity of the gastrointestinal microflora, conferring health benefits. Example of prebiotic is polysaccharide inulin. Studies with these compounds have been conducted, showing promising results. A small placebo-controlled trial using B. breve breve (Yakut®) in children undergoing chemotherapy for a variety of neoplasms has shown that this group had fewer episodes of fever and less frequency of use of intravenous antibiotics compared to controls. There are also studies that suggest that the alteration of the intestinal flora can increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy as a form of modulation of the immune system in several animal models of colorectal cancer. In addition, the use of this strategy could have a modulatory effect on local and systemic toxicity of the treatment, possibly reducing the morbidity of the treatment, as already suggested by studies in cervical carcinomas.

Despite the strong scientific rationale, there are no studies that have evaluated the use of probiotics or prebiotics in order to increase the effectiveness of conventional Ch-RT treatment in ACSCC. Therefore, based on the assumptions that there is a need for research that increases the cure rates of the definitive treatment of Ch-RT in ACSCC; ACSCC is a virus-associated tumor in many cases and therefore potentially immunogenic; immunotherapy is a promising strategy in ACSCC; and that pre- and probiotics can stimulate the immune system through modulation of the intestinal microbiota, and improve oncological outcomes, the investigators propose a randomized phase II study of the use of pre-probiotics during definitive treatment of Ch-RT for patients with ACSCC located.

The primary hypothesis of this study is that addition of pre- and probiotics increases the proportion of patients with complete clinical and radiological response after Ch-RT to ACSCC. Secondary hypotheses are that pre- and probiotics increase the metabolic response measured by positron emission computed tomography (PET-CT) with 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) and promote greater control of local disease after Ch-RT; and reduce local and systemic toxicity of treatment.

Eligible patients who consent to participate in this study will be randomized 1: 1 in two groups: Group A or experimental and Group B or control

The researchers will identify the patients through a unique number and through the initials of the name. Randomization will be simple and conducted independently by clinical trial support staff who are not participating in the study. The random sequence will be generated by computer program.

Prebiotics and Probiotics During Definitive Treatment With Chemotherapy-radiotherapy SCC of the Anal Canal (BISQUIT)

A Randomized Phase II Study of the Administration of Prebiotics and Probiotics During Definitive Treatment With Chemotherapy-radiotherapy for Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal (BISQUIT)

absence of visible disease at the clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis (or pelvic tomography, if contraindicated to MRI) and without disease at a distance, through tomography of the chest and abdomen.

Comparing the mean pre-and post-Ch-RT volume-capture measurements of each patient at 6-8 weeks post Ch-RT

defined as absence of disease visible to clinical and pelvic MRI (or pelvic tomography) exams and without disease at a distance, through tomography of the chest and abdomen;

defined as the time from day1 cycle 1 of Ch-RT treatment to local or remote relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

Proportion of patients without colostomy 12 months after Ch-RT termination.

Adverse events of grade 2 or higher by the Common Adverse Event Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE) version 4.0.

Incidence of positivity for HPV screening in tumor tissue through genotyping

Defined by variation in total number of lymphocytes, neutrophil / lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte / monocyte ratio (LMR)

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Proton Versus Photon Therapy in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma	NCT04462042	Anal Cancer Squ...	Proton radiothe... Photon radiothe...	18 Years -	Umeå University
Proton Versus Photon Therapy in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma	NCT04462042	Anal Cancer Squ...	Proton radiothe... Photon radiothe...	18 Years -	Umeå University
Prebiotics and Probiotics During Definitive Treatment With Chemotherapy-radiotherapy SCC of the Anal Canal (BISQUIT)	NCT03870607	Anal Cancer Squ...	prebiotics in c...	18 Years -	AC Camargo Cancer Center

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for anal cancer squamous cell