Neoplasms

Blood and Lymph Conditions

All Conditions

Rare Diseases

Leukemia

Leukemia, Myeloid

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Hematologic Diseases

Myeloid Leukemia

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute Non Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Acute Graft Versus Host Disease

Anti-Infective Agents

Antineoplastic Agents

All Drugs and Chemicals

Analgesics

Antirheumatic Agents

Anti-Inflammatory Agents

Cytarabine

Mitoxantrone

Cyclophosphamide

Prednisone

Vincristine

Thioguanine

Idarubicin

Conventional consolidation (CONS) (active comparator) (6-thioguanine 60 mg/m2/d, on days 1 to 43 orally; prednisone 40 mg/m2/d, on days 1 to 28 orally; vincristine 1.5 mg/m2/d, on days 1, 8, 15, 22; idarubicin 7 mg/m2/d, on days 1, 8, 15, 22; cytarabine 75 mg/m2/d, on days 3-6, 10-13, 17-20, 24-27, 31-34, 38-41; intrathecal cytarabine on days 1, 15, 29, 43 \[age-dependent dose\]; cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/d, on days 29, 43)

Block Therapy: AI block (randomized; cytarabine 500 mg/m2 as continuous infusion ×4 days and idarubicin 7 mg/m2 on days 3 and 5; intrathecal cytarabine on days 0 and 6), haM block (high-dose cytarabine 1 g/m2 every 12 hours for 3 days and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 on days 4 and 5, intrathecal cytarabine days 6 and 15)

Consolidation 6-thioguanine 60 mg/m2/d, 1 to 43 po; prednisone 40 mg/m2/d, on days 1-28 orally; vincristine 1.5 mg/m2/d, days 1, 8, 15, 22; idarubicin 7 mg/m2/d, on days 1, 8, 15, 22; cytarabine 75 mg/m2/d, on days 3-6, 10-13, 17-20, 24-27, 31-34, 38-41; intrathecal cytarabine on days 1, 15, 29, 43; cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/d, days 29, 43.

ARM A: Active Comparator Drug

Blocks AI Cytarabine 500 mg/m2 as 24 infusion infusion x 4 d; Idarubicin 7 mg/m2 on days 3 and 5; Intrathecal cytarabine on days 0 and 6.

haM Cytarabine 1 g/m2 every 12 hours for 3 days; Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 days 4 and 5; Intrathecal cytarabine days 6 and 15.

ARM B: Blocks Therapy Drug

Alcyra Fynn, Dr.

GATLA 8-AML´07 trial is an multicenter phase III dose-optimization trial for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemias in children and adolescents. Patients are treated with a combination of intensive chemotherapy in combination with intrathecal-injection by CNS and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The patients are stratified in a standard-group (SR) and a high risk-group (HR). SR was defined as FAB (French-American-British) M1/M2 with Auer rods; FAB M4eo or favorable cytogenetics \[t(8;21)/AML1-ETO or inv(16) or t(16;16) and/or CBFB/MYH11)\]; bone marrow blasts ≤5% on day 15. HR was defined as all others. SR patients were reclassified to the HR group if FLT3-ITD positive.

Based on the experience of the BFM group, it was decided to randomly evaluate whether the six-drug conventional consolidation stage can be replaced with the use of a consolidation based by block therapy on drugs of proven efficacy in AML with the aim of reducing residual disease, and the toxicity of this stage. Patients are randomized once the double induction is completed into those who will receive the conventional consolidation phase and those who will receive consolidation with the combination of high doses cytarabine and two different anthracyclines sequentially.

All patients in the trial, whether standard risk (SR) or high risk (HR), receive 2 Induction courses: AIE and HAM and then are randomized to continue with the consolidation phase: a conventional consolidation (Arm A) with 6 drugs vs 2 blocks of chemotherapy that are incorporated in this protocol (AI and haM) (Arm B) and then an Intensification phase with high doses of cytarabine and etoposide. The difference between the SR and AR groups is that the former don't continue with the maintenance phase, while those in HR receive 1 year of Maintenance if they don't have a histoidentical family donor. SR patients according to cytogenetics and with \< 5% blasts in the bone marrow on day 15, haven´t indication for TCHP in 1st CR. HR patients, with a histoidentical family donor, will be transplanted in the 1st. CR after the Consolidation phases or the AI and haM blocks, according to the treatment arm that corresponded to them by randomization

It is a randomized model, the evaluation is based on event time (overall survival, event free survival, cumulative incidence relapse with treatment related mortality as competitive event). Comparator log rank test.

Comparison of Consolidation Strategies for Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Comparison of Consolidation Strategies for Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia - Results of the Randomized GATLA 8-LMA-P'07 Trial

The GATLA 8-LMA-P'07 was a randomized trial including pediatric AML children in Argentina; the design was based on AML-BFM 98 with minor modifications.(10) Similar to AML-BFM 98, the trial compared two approaches to consolidation. The standard regimen was a 6-week consolidation phase (CONS), which was also used in AML-BFM 93 vs. the comparator regimen of two short chemotherapy cycles (two-cycle) with cytarabine plus idarubicin (AI) and high dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone (haM). AML-BFM 98 previously demonstrated that haM was tolerable.10 We hypothesized that the two-cycle consolidation (two-cycle) would be associated with lower relapse rates related to dose intensification compared to the standard CONS approach.

EFS was calculated from date of randomization to first event (death, resistant leukemia, relapse or secondary malignancy) or date of last follow-up.

OS was also calculated from date of randomization to date of death or date of last follow-up.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for arm a: active comparator drug