Neoplasms

Urinary Tract, Sexual Organs, and Pregnancy Conditions

All Conditions

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Urologic Neoplasms

Urogenital Neoplasms

Urogenital Diseases

Female Urogenital Diseases

Pregnancy Complications

Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications

Urinary Bladder Diseases

Urologic Diseases

Male Urogenital Diseases

Tumors from patient having muscle invasive bladder cancer who benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatine included in VESPER cohort

Tumors from patient having muscle invasive bladder cancer who benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatine included in Saint-Louis cohort

Tumors from patient having muscle invasive bladder cancer who benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatine

neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatine

David MALLET

Determine the sensitivity/resistance to chemotherapy of the various subgroups of muscle-invasive bladder cancers, including the basal subgroup (about 25% of these tumours) according to 4 different classifications based on molecular or immunohistochemical classifiers.

Basal Tumours in Bladder Cancer, Response to chemoTherapy

Institut Curie

APHP

University Hospital, Rouen

Symptoms and General Pathology

Behaviors and Mental Disorders

Rare Diseases

Disease Progression

Seminoma

Germinoma

Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Quality of Life

Testicular Seminoma

Central Nervous System Germinoma

Antineoplastic Agents

All Drugs and Chemicals

Carboplatin

Etoposide

Cisplatin

Etoposide phosphate

RADIOTHERAPY boost 20 to 30 Gy on lymph nodes

Radiotherapy boost 20 to 30 Gy, in daily 2 Gy fractions and 5 fractions per week :

* 20 Gy if no more disease is visible (node \< 1 cm in large diameter)
* 24 Gy for nodes \<= 2 cm
* 30 Gy for nodes \> 2 cm

Radiotherapy boost

Carboplatin at dose (mg) = AUC7 (mg/ml x min) x (DFG ml/min + 25)

Carboplatin AUC7

3 Cycles of EP chemotherapy, administred every 3 weeks following standard practice

3 cycles of EP

Ellen BLANC

Aude FLECHON, Dr

Elodie KLAJER

Marine GROSS-GOUPIL

Florence JOLY

Hakim MAHAMMEDI

Thomas RYCKEWAERT

Aurélien CARNOT

Julia PESTRE MUNIER

Valérie LE BRUN-LY

Aude FLECHON

Armelle VINCENEUX

Gwenaëlle GRAVIS

Slimane DERMECHE

Mathilde GUERIN

Cécile VICIER

Agnès DUCOULOMBIER

Delphine BORCHIELLINI

Stéphane CULINE

Clément DUMONT

Tiphaine LAMBERT

Emmanuelle BOMPAS

Frédéric ROLLAND

Christine ABRAHAM

Christine CHEVREAU

Thibaud VALENTIN

Loïc MOUREY

Damien POUESSEL

Lionel GEOFFROIS

Camille SIMON

Vincent MASSART

Pierre BLANCHARD

Phase II, multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-comparative, de-escalation study.

Patients with stage IIa/IIb \< 3 cm seminoma histologically proved after orchiectomy will be included in the study and will receive 1 cycle of Etoposide Cisplatine (EP) chemotherapy.

Patients with negative week-3 PET-scan after the EP cycle, will be randomized (1:1 ratio, stratification according to the disease stage (stage IIa versus IIb seminoma)) to receive either radiotherapy (RT) boost on lymph nodes or 1 cycle of carboplatin AUC7 chemotherapy.

Patients with positive week-3 PET-scan will received 3 additional cycles of EP chemotherapy.

In parallel, eligible patients scheduled to receive standard lombo-aortic RT will be registered in an observational cohort.

Stage II seminoma is defined by the presence of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. It concerns approximately 15% of patients with seminoma. The standard treatment for patients with stage IIa/b seminoma, after orchiectomy, is extended lumbo-aortic/ipsilateral iliac radiotherapy (RT). Performing chemotherapy (CT) with 3 courses of Bleomycin-Etoposide-Cisplatin (BEP) or 4 courses of Etoposide-Cisplatin (EP) is an alternative.

The optimal treatment choice remains controversial. Both treatment modalities are associated with excellent efficacy but also acute and late toxicities. European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines recommended in equal measure CT and RT for stage IIa. A recent systematic review concluded that RT and cisplatin-based combination CT are equally effective in clinical stage IIa/IIb seminoma, with a trend in favor of chemotherapy in stage IIb because of lower relapse rate. However, due to the rarity of stage II seminoma, a sufficiently powered randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with chemotherapy is unlikely to be completed.

De-escalation strategies are required to minimize acute and long-term toxicities while maintaining efficacy. De-escalated treatment for seminoma patients with stage IIb/IIC/III and good prognosis according to International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG), based on negative PET after 2 cycles of EP chemotherapy, is feasible and safe according to SEMITEP results (cohort 2). In case of negative PET, 1 additional cycle of CT with carboplatin AUC7 was administered.

Furthermore, serum levels of microRNA (miR)-371a-3p (miRNA-M371) have been significantly associated with clinical stage, primary tumor size and response to treatment in testicular germ cell tumors, with sensitivity and specificity higher than those of classic markers (hCGt, LDH). However, further evaluations are needed before modifying clinical practices.

We propose to conduct a multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-comparative, de-escalation phase II study in patients with stage IIa/IIb seminoma \< 3 cm, evaluating:

* a more de-escalated CT treatment: 1 cycle of EP followed, in case of negative PET, by either a boost of RT on lymph node or 1 cycle of carboplatin AUC7
* the biomarker miRNA-M371 in therapeutic decision and correlation with PET.

In parallel, eligible patients scheduled to receive standard lombo-aortic RT will be registered in an observational cohort.

* In case of negative week-3 (after 1 EP cyle) PET-scan: Randomization according to 2 arms

  1. Boost of radiotherapy 20 to 30 Gray (Gy) (ARM A)
  2. Carboplatin AUC7 chemotherapy (ARM B)
* In case of positive week-3 PET-scan: 3 courses of EP chemotherapy (ARM C)

Parallel observational cohort for patients scheduled to receive standard lumbo-aortic radiotherapy after orchiectomy

De-escalation Study for Stage IIa/IIb < 3 cm Seminoma

Prospective Therapeutic De-escalation and miRNA-M371 Biomarker Evaluation Phase II Study for Stage IIa/IIb < 3 cm Seminomas

Progression-free rate at 36 months

The PFR-36M is assumed to be a random variable following a binomial distribution Bin (n, p) where n is the sample size and p is the true underlying PFR-36M. Conclusions and inferences will be conducted on p. The prior distribution of p (representing the knowledge of the progression-free rate probability prior to observing the data) will be pre-specified. In the absence of a strong idea about the PFR-36M to be observed, a non-informative prior distribution Beta (1,1) will be considered.

Pr\[PFR-36M ≥ 80%\] will be expressed in each arm, associated with its 95% credibility interval. A treatment arm will be considered a positive sign for efficacy of de-escalation if there is a high probability that PFR-36M will be higher or equal to 80%: Pr\[PFR-36M ≥ 80%\] ≥ 90%. It means that if most of the distribution (90% of it) falls to the right hand side of 80%, it indicates that it is very likely that the effect is at least 80%

Serum level of miRNA-M371 as a potential biomarker of response. Association between serum level of miRNA M371 and response to treatments (according to RECIST v1.1) will be evaluated using a non-parametric Wilcoxon Mann and Whitney test and describe with boxplots.

Correlation between serum level of miRNA M371 and FDG-PET results (metabolic response) will be evaluated using the Kendall rank correlation and describe graphically.

The Overall Survival will be defined as the time from date of inclusion to the date of death, from any cause. Patient whose death is not known at the time of analysis will be censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive.

The Kaplan-Meier (KM) approach will be used to estimate median OS. Median OS as well as Survival rates at specific timepoints will be presented together with their 95% confidence interval (CI).

The QoL will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

The tolerance to each treatment will be described mainly on the frequency of adverse events (AEs) and their intensity and severity determined using the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grading scale version 5. Descriptive statistics will be provided for characterizing and assessing patient tolerance to treatment.

AEs will be described and coded, in total and per System Organ Class and Preferred Term with Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) coding

Centre Leon Berard

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization	Link
Basal Tumours in Bladder Cancer, Response to chemoTherapy	NCT04089748	Bladder Cancer Chemotherapy Ef...	neoadjuvant che...	18 Years - 80 Years	University Hospital, Rouen
De-escalation Study for Stage IIa/IIb < 3 cm Seminoma	NCT05529251	Seminoma Stage II	Radiotherapy bo... Carboplatin AUC... 3 cycles of EP	18 Years -	Centre Leon Berard

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for cisplatine

Every month we try and update this database with for cisplatine cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for cisplatine

Every month we try and update this database with for cisplatine cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them. We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Every month we try and update this database with for cisplatine cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.