All the patients that accepted to participate in the study were provided with Dignity Therapy Intervention. A short-term intervention aimed at reducing existential distress of patients facing with advanced illness.

The Italian version Dignity Therapy intervention (Chochinov HM 2015) has been delivered. Intervention questions were not previously delivered to patients.

DT interview was provided to patients by Specifically trained Nurses. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed then revised by the patients to develop the final Generativity Document. Generativity Document was delivered to patients that could share it with their loved ones.

Dignity Therapy

Francesca Nunziante

Aim of the study was to asses feasibility and acceptability of a nurse delivered Dignity Therapy (DT) intervention on advanced cancer patients referring to an Hospital palliative care unit. To achieve this aim a mixed-method approach using before and after evaluation and semi-structured interviews has been used.

Feasibility of Dignity Therapy Intervention on Cancer Patients in Charge to an Hospital Palliative Care Unit.

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Dignity Therapy Intervention on Palliative Care Program's Cancer Patients Referring to a Medical Oncology Ward.

The number of participants who sign the informed consent form divided by the number who are asked to participate in the study

The number of participants who performed the post intervention assesment divided by the number of enrolled one.

Semi-structured interviews administered to the three nurses that implemented the higher number of DT interventions. Interview were performed after the last patient completed the post intervention assessment.

Patient Dignity Inventory (Italian version). Scale range 25-125, higher value means higher dignity-related distress.

The acceptability of Dignity Therapy was assessed by the Italian version of "Dignity Therapy Patient Feedback Questionnaire" survey.

Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Reggio Emilia

Neoplasms

Digestive System Diseases

Gland and Hormone Related Diseases

All Conditions

Respiratory Tract (Lung and Bronchial) Diseases

Rare Diseases

Pancreatic Neoplasms

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Lung Neoplasms

Carcinoma

Respiratory Tract Neoplasms

Thoracic Neoplasms

Lung Diseases

Respiratory Tract Diseases

Carcinoma, Bronchogenic

Bronchial Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Digestive System Neoplasms

Endocrine Gland Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Pancreatic Diseases

Endocrine System Diseases

Pancreatic Cancer

Dignity Therapy/Life Plan will be provided by an advanced practice nurse or chaplain (APN/Chap), who has undergone training in provision of Dignity Therapy (offered through a 3-day group workshop by Dr. Harvey Chochinov).

Ann Marie Dose, PhD, RN

This study will evaluate feasibility and acceptability of providing the Dignity Therapy/Life Plan intervention to pancreatic or advanced lung cancer patients presenting for treatment in the outpatient medical oncology setting. Investigators hypothesize that providing dignity therapy to this population will be feasible.

Dignity Therapy/Life Plan in Patients With Pancreatic or Advanced Lung Cancer

Phase I/IIA: Dignity Therapy/Life Plan in Patients With Pancreatic or Advanced Lung Cancer

A clean, deidentified data set will be made available to qualified requestors at study completion/dissemination.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Nurse Researcher

Behaviors and Mental Disorders

Depressive Disorder

Depression

Patients in this group will be treated with dignity therapy by the researcher.

Patients in this group will receive standard care and no treatment will be performed by the researcher.

Dignity therapy will be applied in the interview room that will be requested in the oncology clinic to protect the confidentiality of information.

The application is planned as five sessions and the sessions will last approximately 40 minutes. Two questions in the dignity therapy protocol will be discussed in each session.

Dignity therapy

Patients in this group will receive standard treatment and care in the clinic. No action will be taken other than standard care.

standardize care

NESIBE GÜNAY MOLU

Selda ARSLAN

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of dignity therapy on the quality of life and depression levels of cancer patients.

Methods: The research was planned as a randomized controlled experimental study.

Type of Research: Research, experimental, control group and pretest-posttest study will be carried out.

Population of the Study: The population of the study was sent to Meram Medical Faculty Hospital Oncology Clinic consists of male and female inpatients.

Sample of the Research: Those who agreed to participate in the research and met the inclusion criteria. Patients who meet will be included in the study. It was 48. It was planned to be.

Randomization: In this study, parallel group block randomization method was applied to the intervention and control groups. will be allocated randomly. Block randomization was used because the sample size was small. Patients will be selected equally using permutation method, and randomization will be selected using blocking technique. will be done. During randomization, CONSORT 2017 will be used.

For randomization; To control for performance bias, patients will be blinded to the study hypothesis and will not be informed which group they are in. There will be no blinding for the researcher. However, blind technique will be used in the research. This blind technique will be applied by the researcher with the patients blinded until the application begins..

Data Collection Techniques and Tools: "Personal Information Form", "Patient Dignity Inventory" and "Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale" were used in data collection (RSES)" will be used.

Cancer affects both the patient and their relatives physically and psychologically. From the moment cancer is diagnosed, psychological problems that affect the adaptation processes of individuals, which can be defined as crises, may arise along with the physical effects of the disease and the treatment process. It is suggested that the loss of dignity that develops in terminally ill patients causes the patients to want to die as soon as possible. It is important that patients receive care in accordance with the standards and value judgments they are used to, so that their sense of dignity and status is not affected by health problems. Dignity therapy is a type of short-term therapy developed to alleviate the distress of terminally ill patients and improve their end-of-life experiences. Chochinov emphasizes that dignity depends on productivity experiences, the search for purpose and meaning, defined dignity-protective care for patients facing a serious illness, and developed a model to be developed, studied and used by clinicians.

In the literature, it is seen that dignity therapy can be applied by different health professionals in patient groups with different diagnoses and provides positive contributions for patients and their relatives. With the increase in palliative care units in recent years, it has been considered important to apply this type of therapy to patients. In addition, no studies on dignity therapy have been found in Turkey. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of dignity therapy on the quality of life and depression levels of cancer patients.

Methods: The research was planned as a randomized controlled experimental study. Research Outpatient and inpatient treatment at Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Medicine hospital oncology clinic It will be done with end-stage cancer patients. October 2023-December 2023 with an average of 48 patients It will be carried out between . In collecting research data, Personal Information Form, Patient The Reputation Inventory and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) will be used.

Type of Research: Research, experimental, control group and pretest-posttest study will be carried out.

Place and Characteristics of the Research: The research was conducted in Konya province by Necmettin Erbakan It will be carried out in the Oncology clinic of University Meram Faculty of Medicine Hospital.Inpatient clinics are located on the 3rd and 4th floors, and there are 33 beds on each floor. Population of the Study: The population of the study was sent to Meram Medical Faculty Hospital Oncology Clinic consists of male and female inpatients.

Sample of the Research: Those who agreed to participate in the research and met the inclusion criteria. Patients who meet will be included in the study. The sample size in this study In order to determine the results, a priori power analysis was performed with the G-Power 3.1 statistical program. In determining the sample size, "The effect of Chinese culture-adapted dignity therapy on advanced cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the Scores obtained from the "day oncology unit: A quasi-experimental study" study were used. 95% confidence (1-α), 80% test power (1-β), With an effect size of f = 0.78, the minimum number of samples to be included in the study was determined as 44 in total, 22 in each group. Patients are excluded from the study for many reasons. It was thought that there might be a loss of approximately 10% due to separation, and the number of samples was 48. It was planned to be.

Randomization: In this study, parallel group block randomization method was applied to the intervention and control groups. will be allocated randomly. Block randomization was used because the sample size was small. Patients will be selected equally using permutation method, and randomization will be selected using blocking technique. will be done. During randomization, CONSORT 2017 (Randomized Parallel Group Updated Guidelines for Reporting Research) will be used.

For randomization; To control for performance bias, patients will be blinded to the study hypothesis and will not be informed which group they are in. There will be no blinding for the researcher. However, blind technique will be used in the research. This blind technique will be applied by the researcher with the patients blinded until the application begins. In the research, in order to meet the blind technical conditions, the process steps were carried out by an independent statistician from the first stage. The sample will be sorted by a combination order and number. In this way selection bias will be controlled. The study will also be controlled for attrition bias and Statistics and reporting bias.

Data Collection Techniques and Tools: "Personal Information Form (sociodemographic and disease characteristics)", "Patient Dignity Inventory" and "Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale" were used in data collection (RSES)" will be used.

Data Collection Tools Personal Information Form: The form created by the researcher by scanning the literature consists of 8 questions (age, gender, marital status, employment status, monthly income level, education level, cancer type, how long ago it was diagnosed).

Patient Dignity Inventory: The scale, consisting of a total of 25 items, was developed by Chochinov et al. (2008) and translated into Turkish by Eskigülek and Kav (2022) adapted. This five-point Likert type inventory is rated as "1 = no problem, 2 = slight problem, 3 = problem, 4 = big problem, 5 = very much problem." The minimum and maximum total score of the inventory is 25 and 125 points respectively. There are no reverse scored items in the inventory. A higher total score means that the individual's perceived reputation is complex. Items scoring three or more are clinically meaningful. As a result of factor analysis, a five-factor structure was obtained; The factors are reported as "symptom distress", "existential distress", "addiction", "peace of mind" and "social support". The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was reported as 0.94.

Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was developed by Morris Rosenberg in 1965 to measure the self-esteem of adolescents (Rosenberg, 1965). Participants score the questions as very true, true, false and very false. This scale, developed by Rosenberg, consists of a total of 63 items and 12 subtests. Self-Esteem Scale, one of these 12 subtests, was used in this study. The scale consists of a total of 10 items, 5 negative and 5 positive items. For questions 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7, respectively, it is very true (4), true (3), wrong (2), very wrong (1). The opposite is true for articles 3, 5, 8, 9 and 10. A high score on Rosenberg self-esteem means low self-esteem. A scale adaptation study was conducted by Çuhadaroğlu in 1985. As a result of this study, the test-retest reliability of the scale was found to be 0.75. The validity coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.71.

Application Steps: After the patients coming to the oncology clinic as outpatients or inpatients are evaluated by their physicians, they will be referred to the researcher if the predicted survival time is less than 6 months. The purpose of the study will be explained to patients who meet the inclusion criteria, and for those who accept, planning will be made in a way that will not disrupt the patient's treatment process, and the steps applied in dignity therapy will be followed. Dignity therapy will be applied in the interview room that will be requested in the oncology clinic to protect the confidentiality of information.

The application is planned as five sessions and the sessions will last approximately 40 minutes. Two questions in the dignity therapy protocol will be discussed in each session. Dignity Therapy Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Nursing, Department of Mental Health and Diseases Nursing. Lecturer It will be carried out by the researcher who serves as a member. She has worked as a clinical nurse researcher and is an expert in psychiatric nursing. Before the researcher started to apply this therapy, the 3-day "Dignity in Care - Online Training 2023" (https://www.cpd-umanitoba.com/events/dignityin-care-online-training) was held online between 14-28 September 2023. -2023/) attended the course. The course is hosted by Harvey Max Chochinov, a Distinguished Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Manitoba and Senior Scientist at the Cancer Care Manitoba Research Institute.

The therapist will interview each participant individually, it will be conducted in accordance with the dignity therapy protocol, the interviews will be recorded with a voice recorder, all recorded conversations will be transcribed and read to the patient after a preliminary arrangement.

A discussion will be held on the areas that the patient wishes to change in the text, and as included in the dignity therapy protocol, a session organization process will be carried out with the participant, especially in the last session, in which the participant will be provided with a written legacy (certificate of productivity). The Dignity therapist prepares a document to be transferred to the participants' families, relatives or friends, with patient approval. It will be made ready to be given after submission. The Dignity therapist will create a written report at the end of the interviews to be given to their families and present this report to the patients. The final version of the report will be given by the patients.

Data Collection: Data will be collected by the researcher through face-to-face interviews in the oncology clinic at Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, from patients who meet the inclusion criteria and agree to participate in the study, without disrupting the working order of the clinic. Data collection forms will be applied to both the experimental and control groups as a pretest before dignity therapy begins to be applied to the participants (in the 1st session) and as a posttest after dignity therapy is completed (in the last session). Data collection tools will be filled in the patient room, respecting the patient's privacy.

Research Variables Dependent variables: Patient Dignity Inventory, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Independent variables: Sociodemographic and disease characteristics, applied dignity therapy Control variables: Age, gender Ethical Dimension of the Research: Permission for the research was received from Necmettin Erbakan University Health Sciences Scientific Research Ethics Committee and the Faculty of Medicine Hospital Oncology Clinic. Permission will be obtained via e-mail from the authors of the scales to be used. Participants who will participate in the research will be given verbal information about the research and Informed Consent Form will be signed.

Participants who do not agree to participate in the research will not be forced to participate. There is no conflict of interest between the researchers.

Statistical Evaluation of Data: Statistical analysis will be done using SPSS 23.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 23.0) program. Cronbach's Alpha analysis will be used in the internal consistency examination to determine the validity and reliability of the scale, descriptive statistics will be used to determine the findings regarding the individual characteristics of the participants, median and minimum/maximum values for non-normally distributed variables, and mean±standard deviation values for normally distributed variables. Appropriate statistical analyzes regarding the hypotheses will be used to compare independent variables. The results obtained will be tested at the p\<0.05 significance level.

Research, experimental control group and pretest-posttest study will be carried out.

To control for performance bias, patients will be blinded to the study hypothesis and will not be informed which group they are in. There will be no blinding for the researcher. However, blind technique will be used in the research. This blind technique will be applied by the researcher with the patients blinded until the application begins. In the research, in order to meet the blind technical conditions, the process steps were carried out by an independent statistician from the first stage. The sample will be sorted by a combination order and number. In this way selection bias will be controlled. The study will also be controlled for attrition bias and Statistics and reporting bias.

The Effect of Dignity Therapy Applied to Cancer Patients

The Effect of Dignity Therapy Applied to End-stage Cancer Patients on Perceived Dignity and Self-esteem: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Data will not be shared due to protection of patient confidentiality and institutional rules.

The scale, consisting of a total of 25 items, was developed by Chochinov et al. (2008) and translated into Turkish by Eskigülek and Kav (2022) adapted. The minimum and maximum total score of the inventory is 25 and 125 points respectively. There are no reverse scored items in the inventory. A higher total score means that the individual's perceived reputation is complex. Items scoring three or more are clinically significant. As a result of factor analysis, a five-factor structure was obtained; The factors are reported as "symptom distress", "existential distress", "addiction", "peace of mind" and "social support"

The form created by the researcher by scanning the literature consists of 8 questions

The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was developed by Morris Rosenberg in 1965 to measure the self-esteem of adolescents (Rosenberg, 1965). Participants score the questions as very true, true, false and very false. This scale, developed by Rosenberg, consists of a total of 63 items and 12 subtests. Self-Esteem Scale, one of these 12 subtests, was used in this study. The scale consists of a total of 10 items, 5 negative and 5 positive items. A high score on Rosenberg self-esteem means low self-esteem.

Necmettin Erbakan University

Assoc. Prof.

Virtual Dignity Therapy will be facilitated by a registered nurse or medical doctor trained in Dignity Therapy.

Virtual Dignity Therapy

Melissa Felt

Deirdre R. Pachman, MD

Deirdre Pachman, MD

The purpose of this study is to determine if it is feasible and acceptable to recruit for and deliver the Virtual Dignity Therapy intervention to palliative care patients with advanced cancer.

This study is an investigator-initiated, single site Mayo Clinic Rochester prospective minimal risk pilot study to determine feasibility and acceptability of Virtual Dignity Therapy. The Dignity Therapy intervention is a brief, individualized psychotherapy that aims to relieve psycho-emotional and existential distress and improve the experiences of patients whose lives are impacted by serious illness. This therapy offers patients an opportunity to reflect on their life with a trained facilitator and share their thoughts and memories with family and other people in their life. This therapy consists of a total of 3 sessions, with each session 2-4 weeks apart, in which the investigator provides questions focused on life review. The sessions are recorded and transcribed. The interventionist will work with patients to edit the document and provide a final generativity document for patient to keep and give to loved ones.

Virtual Dignity Therapy for Palliative Care Patients With Advanced Cancer

Feasibility and Acceptability of Virtual Dignity Therapy for Palliative Care Patients With Advanced Cancer

Study feasibility will be measured by the number of participants who enrolled and finished the study.

Acceptability, as measured by the 7-item Was it Worth It (WIWI Questionnaire).The questions are answered as either "yes, no, or uncertain," overall perception of quality of life change, overall perception of study experience, one open-ended feedback question, and an option to talk with someone about concerns. Positive responses indicate acceptability. Results are reported as individual items.

Principal Investigator

Colorectal Neoplasms

Intestinal Neoplasms

Colonic Diseases

Intestinal Diseases

Rectal Diseases

Psychotropic Drugs

All Drugs and Chemicals

At registration, subjects will be mailed a questionnaire. The subject will then receive two separate dignity therapy sessions, about a week apart. Subjects will then be asked to complete a questionnaire 1-2 weeks after completing therapy sessions and one month after completing therapy sessions.

At registration, subjects will be mailed a questionnaire. The subject will then receive two separate dignity therapy sessions; the first session will take place about 6 weeks after registration, with the second session occurring 1-3 weeks after the first. Subjects will then be asked to complete a questionnaire about one month after completing therapy sessions.

Dignity therapy is a psychotherapeutic intervention developed to address psychosocial and existential distress among terminally ill patients. Basically, it invites patients to discuss topics that matter most or how they want to be remembered. This interview is recorded and then edited and returned to the patient to be used for further reflection or for sharing with loved ones.

Linda Emanuel, MD, PhD

The purpose of this study is to try and improve the way that patients with colon cancer understand and cope with their illness and give them tools for talking with their loved ones and family about their illness.

Dignity Therapy is a well tolerated structured interview that helps patients reflect on who they are, what is most important to them and what lessons they have learned through life. For patients not receiving chemotherapy, Dignity Therapy gave patients more hope, more meaning in their life, and helped their families. Researchers at Northwestern University would like to see if it has the same effect in patients getting chemotherapy. We will also see if the Dignity Therapy changes patient's understanding of their disease and their medical preferences.

All study procedures will take place when participants come for a scheduled doctor's visit or to receive chemotherapy. At the first visit participants will answer a questionnaire taking approximately 15-30 minutes. Participants will then have a Dignity Therapy Session approximately 1-2 weeks later. A second Dignity Therapy Session will be scheduled again in another 1-2 weeks. Each study Dignity Therapy Session will take approximately an hour. One to two weeks later a repeat questionnaire will be filled out. Finally, a third and final questionnaire will be complete 4 weeks later.

Dignity Therapy in mCRC to Increase Peaceful Awareness & Impact Goals of Care Decision-Making

Use of Dignity Therapy in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy to Increase Peaceful Awareness and Impact Goals of Care Decision-Making

Measure the impact of dignity therapy on terminal illness acknowledgment and presence of peaceful awareness. Subjects will complete self-evaluation questionnaires at the point of registration and upon completing dignity therapy sessions. The impact will be determined by changes in the patient's baseline self-reported parameters.

Subjects will complete self-evaluation questionnaires at the point of registration and upon completing dignity therapy sessions. The impact will be determined by changes in the patient's baseline self-reported parameters.

Establish a correlation between terminal illness acknowledgement and presence of peaceful awareness with preferences for life sustaining therapy and end-of-life goals of care.

Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center

Northwestern University

Anxiety Disorders

Dignity Therapy is a brief psychotherapeutic intervention consisting of:

1. a tape-recorded session with the patient using the DT question protocol
2. Transcription of the interview, which is then edited
3. A session where the edited transcript is returned to the patient who can give it to family members or friends.

If needed, one or more sessions are added. Dt allows the patient to give voice to the matters of importance concerning himself and his loved ones. Its purpose is to enhance sense of meaning, purpose and worth. It also gives the opportunity to leave something behind to be remembered by.

Mogens Groenvold, MD PhD DSci

The purpose of the study is to investigate whether Danish patients with incurable cancer have a need of, interest in and benefit from Dignity Therapy.

Research in palliative care has primarily focused on physical and psychological symptoms. Research in other psychosocial and existential problems has been sparse. Loss of dignity as a consequence of serious illness may be an important cause of suffering. The research team of the Canadian psychiatrist and professor, Harvey Chochinov has investigated the concept of dignity and developed the psychosocial intervention 'Dignity Therapy' (DT). The preliminary research results were promising.

Research questions: Do Danish cancer patients have a need of, interest in, and benefit from DT? Methods: DT consists of an interview revolving around the patient's life, values, and accomplishments and is also an opportunity to leave messages and words of hope and compassion for friends and family. The interview is audio taped, transcribed, and edited together with the patient, and made into a tangible document, which the patient can give to his/her relatives. The project consists of three parts: (1) a cross-sectional investigation of the prevalence of loss of dignity and related symptoms/problems among at least 200 incurable cancer patients. (2) A feasibility study, testing the intervention in terms of relevance and the need of any modifications in relation to Danish patients. (3) An evaluation study testing the effect of and satisfaction with DT.

At least 80 patients are planned for the feasibility and evaluation studies. Questionnaires are used for detection of loss of dignity and as measures of effect. These will be administered before the intervention and, along with a semi-structured evaluation questionnaire, right after the intervention, when the document is received and again approximately two weeks later.

The duration of the intervention (DT) varies markedly between patients. In some cases the process (interview, transcription, editing of document, and the final meeting where the document is given back to the patient) is completed urgently in a few days, whereas in other cases, the patient prefers a slower pace, and may want to sub-divide the interview into two or more parts. Also, when presented with the document, some patients want to have something changed or they want add material. This variation is seen as intentional, as it illustrates that the process is tailored to the patient's wishes.

As stated, the effect of the DT intervention is evaluated at completion of the intervention, i.e. when the final document is given back to the patient, and about two weeks later. Due to process described above, the time from the first measurement (before intervention) to the second measurement (which takes places at completion of the intervention) therefore varies considerably (median 36 days after baseline, range 7-121 days).

Perspective: If Danish patients have a need of, an interest in and benefit from DT, it can be offered to Danish patients admitted to palliative care.

Implementation and Evaluation of Dignity Therapy in Denmark

Measured with the Structured Interview for Symptoms and Concerns (SISC)

Measured on the Hospital anxiety and depression scale

Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale

Measured on the Patient Dignity Inventory

Measured with the Structured Interview for Symptoms and Concerns

Measured on the Palliative Performance Scale v2

Measured on the Structured Interview for Symptoms and Concerns

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Feasibility of Dignity Therapy Intervention on Cancer Patients in Charge to an Hospital Palliative Care Unit.	NCT04738305	Dignity Advanced Cancer	Dignity Therapy	18 Years -	Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Reggio Emilia
Dignity Therapy/Life Plan in Patients With Pancreatic or Advanced Lung Cancer	NCT02132325	Pancreatic Canc... Non-Small-Cell ...	Dignity Therapy	19 Years -	Mayo Clinic
The Effect of Dignity Therapy Applied to Cancer Patients	NCT06105359	Cancer Dignity	Dignity therapy standardize car...	18 Years - 65 Years	Necmettin Erbakan University
Virtual Dignity Therapy for Palliative Care Patients With Advanced Cancer	NCT05113199	Advanced Cancer	Virtual Dignity...	18 Years -	Mayo Clinic
Dignity Therapy in mCRC to Increase Peaceful Awareness & Impact Goals of Care Decision-Making	NCT01074385	Stage IV Colore...	Dignity Therapy	18 Years -	Northwestern University
Dignity Therapy/Life Plan in Patients With Pancreatic or Advanced Lung Cancer	NCT02132325	Pancreatic Canc... Non-Small-Cell ...	Dignity Therapy	19 Years -	Mayo Clinic
Feasibility of Dignity Therapy Intervention on Cancer Patients in Charge to an Hospital Palliative Care Unit.	NCT04738305	Dignity Advanced Cancer	Dignity Therapy	18 Years -	Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Reggio Emilia
Implementation and Evaluation of Dignity Therapy in Denmark	NCT01507571	Cancer	Dignity Therapy	18 Years -	Bispebjerg Hospital

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for dignity therapy