Neoplasms

Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

All Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Breast Diseases

Skin Diseases

Subjects enrolled in this group will receive a full field digital mammogram, digital breast tomosynthesis exam and an automated whole breast ultrasound exam as part of their visit.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound

Full Field Digital Mammography

This study is investigating whether automated whole breast ultrasound can improve detection of cancer in breast cancer screening when used as a supplement to mammography or as a supplement to digital breast tomosynthesis

Automated Breast Ultrasound and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Compared to Full Field Digital Mammography in Women With Dense Breasts

Abnormal interpretation rates for each modality (FFDM and DBT+V-Preview, with and without ABUS+V-Preview).

Sensitivity will be assessed for each imaging modality: FFDM and DBT+V-Preview, with and without ABUS

Specificity will be assessed for each imaging modality: FFDM and DBT+V-Preview, with and without ABUS

Cancer Rate will be assessed for each imaging modality: FFDM and DBT+V-Preview, with and without ABUS

Positive Predictive Value will be assessed for each imaging modality: FFDM and DBT+V-Preview, with and without ABUS

Negative Predictive Value will be assessed for each imaging modality: FFDM and DBT+V-Preview, with and without ABUS

GE Healthcare

Screen Film Mammography (SFM) followed by Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)

Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) followed by Screen Film Mammography (SFM)

Radiologic test to screen women for Breast cancer using digital detectors

Radiologic test to screen women for Breast cancer using plain film detectors a resolution screen

Screen Film Mammography

Etta Pisano, MD

RATIONALE: Screening tests may help doctors detect cancer cells early and plan more effective treatment for cancer. It is not yet known which type of mammography is more effective in detecting breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Screening and diagnostic trial to compare the effectiveness of two types of mammography in detecting breast cancer in women.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare the diagnostic performance of digital mammography vs screen-film mammography, as measured by the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, in the detection of breast cancer in women.
* Compare the diagnostic accuracy of the digital mammogram obtained using each of the individual manufacturer's digital units vs screen-film mammography through retrospective reader studies.
* Determine the effects of patient characteristics, including age, lesion type, pathologic diagnosis, menopausal and hormonal status, breast density, and family history, on diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography.
* Determine the effects of technical parameters, including display type, machine type, and detector spatial and contrast resolution, on diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography.
* Determine the effect of reduced false-positive mammograms that are expected with digital mammography on the health-related quality of life and personal anxiety of women undergoing this screening experience.
* Compare the diagnostic performance of digital mammography with the rate of cancer in a set of cases through a retrospective reader study.
* Compare the effect of softcopy vs printed film display on the diagnostic performance of digital mammography through a retrospective reader study.
* Compare the effect of breast density on the diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography vs screen-film mammography through a retrospective reader study.
* Compare the image quality and breast radiation dose in digital vs screen-film mammography in these participants.
* Determine the temporal variations in image quality, breast radiation dose, and other quality control parameters in the participating study centers.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Participants with postitive screening results are stratified according to age (under 50 vs 50-59 vs 60-70 vs over 70). Participants are randomized to one of two treatment arms.

* Arm I: Participants undergo a two-view screen-film mammogram followed by a two-view digital mammogram of each breast.
* Arm II: Participants undergo a two-view digital mammogram followed by a two-view screen-film mammogram of each breast.

Quality of life is assessed before the screening mammogram in the first 800 women enrolled. In an additional 1,200 participants (600 with positive screening results and 600 with negative screening results), quality of life is assessed shortly after the screening mammogram and at 1 year.

Participants are followed at 1 year with a repeat screen-film or digital mammogram.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 49,500 participants (24,750 per arm) will be accrued for this study within 18 months.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Automated Breast Ultrasound and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Compared to Full Field Digital Mammography in Women With Dense Breasts	NCT02042456	Breast Cancer	Digital Breast ... Automated Whole... Full Field Digi...	18 Years -	GE Healthcare
Digital Mammography Screening Trial (ACRIN6652)	NCT00008346	Breast Cancer	Full Field Digi... Screen Film Mam...	- 120 Years	American College of Radiology Imaging Network
Digital Mammography Screening Trial (ACRIN6652)	NCT00008346	Breast Cancer	Full Field Digi... Screen Film Mam...	- 120 Years	American College of Radiology Imaging Network

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for full field digital mammography