Neoplasms

Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

All Conditions

Diseases and Abnormalities at or Before Birth

Breast Neoplasms

Congenital Abnormalities

Breast Diseases

Fibrocystic Breast Disease

Skin Diseases

Cases or Patients who underwent robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction are enrolled in this arm. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy should be performed using robotic surgical systems. Robotic surgical systems include da Vinci S,Si, X, Xi, and SP systems. Axillary or lateral incisions are used for this procedure. Immediate reconstruction includes tissue expander insertion, direct-to-implant, latissimus dorsi flap, transverse abdominis rectus muscle flap, or deep inferior epigastric perforators flap. Cases with robotic mastectomy without immediate reconstruction are excluded.

Robotic or endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy

Cases or Patients who underwent conventional mastectomy and immediate reconstruction are enrolled in this arm. Conventional mastectomy should not be performed using robotic or endoscopic surgical systems. Any incisions can be performed for this procedure. Conventional mastectomy includes also Nipple-sparing mastectomy and Skin sparing mastectomy. Immediate reconstruction includes tissue expander insertion, direct-to-implant, latissimus dorsi flap, transverse abdominis rectus muscle flap, or deep inferior epigastric perforators flap. Cases without immediate reconstruction are excluded.

Conventional mastectomy (including nipple sparing mastectomy, skin sparing mastectomy)

Hyung Seok Park, MD, PhD

Younju Lee, MD, PhD

Aeri Han, MD, PhD

Yeongwoo chang, MD, PhD

Hyukjai Shin, MD, PhD

Joo Heung Kim, MD

Hee Jun Choi, MD, PhD

Gusang Kim, MD,PhD

Jeeyeon Lee, MD, PhD

Young Joon Kang, MD, PhD

Ji Young You, MD, PhD

Honggyu Kim, MD, PhD

Jun-Hee Lee, MD, PhD

Sungjun Bae, MD,PhD

Jong-Ho Cheun, MD

Sanguk Woo, MD

Jai Min Ryu, MD, PhD

Sae Byeol Lee, MD, PhD

Robotic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction have been introduced in 2015. However, since robotic mastectomy is the latest surgical technique, there is a lack of studies prospectively comparing conventional mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with robotic mastectomy. For this reason, this study is designed to establish a single institution cohort study that prospectively collects patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction. This study was initially designed as a single institution study, however, currently, the study was extended to the multicenter study including 18 institutions over the country. Using the established prospective cohort data, a comparative study of robotic mastectomy with conventional mastectomy and reconstruction, and cost-effectiveness and satisfaction of robotic endoscopic surgery, and cost-effectiveness and satisfaction of reconstructive surgery are to be analyzed.

This study is a multi-institution cohort study that prospectively collects patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction.

Patients' inclusion criteria is as below; adult women between the ages of 19 and 80, with breast cancer or high risk of breast cancer (patients with a BRCA1/2 mutation, TP53 mutation, PALB2 mutation, etc) scheduled for therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy, and want immediate reconstruction.

Patients planned for breast-conserving surgery or who do not want immediate reconstruction will be excluded. Patients who planned for surgery on both sides in the different methods (e.g. right for RNSM and left for conventional open NSM) are also excluded. Meanwhile, cases with ipsilateral NSM and contralateral partial mastectomy or excision are included.

The goal number of enrolled patients is 2000.

Collecting data includes patients' clinicopathological factors including height, weight, etc. And also collecting surgical results, oncological results, cost-effectiveness, and satisfactions of patients to secure high-level data.

The satisfaction of patients using the Breast Q survey, basic characteristics like height, weight, etc, and patients' photos will be collected preoperatively.

Also, patients' data will be collected within 6 months after surgery including clinical-pathological factors, surgery results (drainage amount, removal date, complications), postoperative recovery evaluation, complications and adverse reactions, cost, etc.

Between 6 months and 1 year(Patients who have undergone skin sparing mastectomy can do within up to 3 years) after surgery, the results of surgery, recurrence, satisfaction survey, and postoperative photos will be collected.

Every 12 months thereafter, whether adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, endocrine therapy) was implemented, surgical results, and recurrence will be investigated and collected until the end of the study period.

An interim analysis will be done after completing the recruitment of subjects by the 4th year after the start of the study and collecting data. Complete the follow-up observation and data collection of the subjects recruited in the 5-9 years and the final analysis will be conducted.

Categorial variables will be examined by the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Continuous variables will be examined by t-test or ANOVA, and M-W test or K-W test if needed.

Survival analysis will be examined by Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank test.

Prospective Study of MAstectomy With Reconstruction Including Robot Endoscopic Surgery

Prospective Cohort Study of Mastectomy With Reconstruction Including Robot Endoscopic Breast Surgery

Postoperative complication rates are calculated as total number of postoperative complication cases per total operation cases.

Clavien-Dindo grade of postoperative complications is evaluated. The highest grade of postoperative complications are used for the analysis.

Events of RFS includes locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, and death. Contralateral breast cancer and second primary malignancy are considered to be censored data.

cancer incidence rate for those underwent prophylactic mastectomy

Reconstruction Expectations of Preoperative Short Form. In all scales, higher scores reflect a better outcome.

1. Mastectomy Module Pre-and Postoperative Scales Satisfaction with Breasts as assessed by BREAST-Q version 2.0. Higher scores reflect a better outcome.
2. Reconstruction Module Pre-and Postoperative Scales Satisfaction with abdomen as assessed by BREAST-Q version 2.0 (This scale should only be completed by the patient who has had reconstruction using a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap(TRAM flap) or deep inferior epigastric perforators flap(DIEP flap). Otherwise, skip it.) Satisfaction with Back as assessed by BREAST-Q version 2.0 (This scale should only be completed by the patient who has had reconstruction using a latissimus dorsi flap. Otherwise, skip it.) Satisfaction with Implants as assessed by BREAST-Q version 2.0 (This scale should only be completed by the patient who has had reconstruction using implants. Otherwise, skip it.) In all scales, higher scores reflect a better outcome.

Satisfaction of Surgery assessed by (Plastic)Surgeon(s) Items(1), Response Options(Overall symmetry, postoperative scar, nipple areolar complex symmetry, etc), Range(0-10) The higher scores are, the better an outcome is.

Cost-effectiveness evaluation according to the surgical method, by conducting a questionnaire survey on the subject 6 months to 1 year(Patients who have undergone skin sparing mastectomy up to 3 years) after the last surgery. Evaluation follows the EuroQol five-dimension scale(EQ5D, EQ5D-5L) Korean version questionnaire. In all scales, higher scores reflect a better outcome.

Severance Hospital

Associate Professor

Symptoms and General Pathology

Urinary Tract, Sexual Organs, and Pregnancy Conditions

Recurrence

Prostatic Neoplasms

Genital Neoplasms, Male

Urogenital Neoplasms

Genital Diseases

Genital Diseases, Male

Urogenital Diseases

Prostatic Diseases

Male Urogenital Diseases

Tumor molecular profiling

Elena Fountzila

We aim to employ targeted DNA NGS to evaluate the prevalence of germline and somatic mutations in cancer predisposing genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, and other HR and DDR genes, including also a few additional clinically relevant genes, in patients with metastatic, locally advanced or high-grade prostate cancer. In addition, we will investigate the prognostic role of these mutations as well as their association with various clinicopathological parameters. This will be the first study investigating the prevalence of germline and somatic pathogenic mutations in Greek patients with prostate cancer.

This study will include formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue (FFPE) from 250 patients with metastatic, recurrent, locally advanced or "intermediate or high risk" (Gleason \>7), operable prostate cancer. FFPE tumor blocks alongside peripheral blood will be retrieved for all patients from Pathology Laboratories. Available FFPE blocks will be subjected to histological review by an experienced pathologist to evaluate H\&E sections for confirmation of diagnosis, histologic type, grade and tumor cell content (TCC%), as well as mark tumor dense areas for manual macro-dissection, prior to DNA extraction, in order to enrich samples for tumor DNA. Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with prostate cancer will be retrieved from their respective medical records. Diagnosis will be confirmed through pathology reports, which will also provide information about Gleason Score and histological subtype.

In all instances, the collection of patient information will be in compliance with the regulations of the Bioethics committees of participating Hospitals. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration of Human Rights.

Following manual macro-dissection, FFPE tumor tissue material will be processed for DNA extraction, according to standard procedures with the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany).

Sequencing will be performed at the Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, using an Ion Torrent Proton Sequencer (Life Technologies/Ion Torrent). For the purpose of targeted NGS genotyping of tumor and available matched germline DNA samples, we designed a custom Ampliseq panel to target coding relevant regions of genes involved in homologous recombination (HR), along with several others.

Data retrieval and base calling will be performed on the Torrent Server (v5.8.0.8). Consequently, we will then employ appropriate Ion Reporter Workflows (version 5.10) to automatically annotate single nucleotide variants (SNVs), multiple nucleotide variants (MNVs), small insertions / deletions (INDELs) and copy number variations (CNVs).

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples and germline DNA

Molecular Profiling in Prostate Cancer

Prognostic and Predictive Value of Tumor Molecular Alterations in Patients With Prostate Cancer

Number of patients with either germline or somatic mutations

Time from diagnosis to the date of death, through the completion of the study

Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

Gland and Hormone Related Diseases

Rare Diseases

Ovarian Neoplasms

Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial

Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome

Carcinoma

Syndrome

Endocrine Gland Neoplasms

Ovarian Diseases

Adnexal Diseases

Genital Diseases, Female

Female Urogenital Diseases

Pregnancy Complications

Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications

Genital Neoplasms, Female

Endocrine System Diseases

Gonadal Disorders

Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary

Genetic Diseases, Inborn

Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian Epithelial Cancer

Women with a pelvic mass, symptomatic or asymptomatic.

Women diagnosed with a pelvis mass undergoing genetic testing through our commercial offering.

Subject must not have an identifiable adnexal mass and may, or may not, have a family history or a known familial genetic abnormality (germ line or identified in family cancer i.e. somatic DNA mutation) associated with ovarian cancer.

Multifactorial Risk Assessment for Breast \& Ovarian Cancer Risk Detection

OVA360

Todd Pappas, PhD

The objective of this project is to validate a next-generation assay that utilizes both the protein biomarkers of our already established ovarian cancer risk assessment combined with a molecular profile in both germline and early somatic detection.

Multifactorial Risk Assessment for Breast & Ovarian Cancer Risk Detection

Identify the molecular key driver of Ovarian cancer and develop a diagnostic test for early Ovarian cancer detection

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Prospective Study of MAstectomy With Reconstruction Including Robot Endoscopic Surgery	NCT04585074	Breast Neoplasm... Germline BRCA1 ... Germline BRCA2 ... Benign Breast D... Germline Mutati...	Robotic or endo... Conventional ma...	19 Years - 80 Years	Severance Hospital
Molecular Profiling in Prostate Cancer	NCT04983628	Prostate Cancer... Prostate Cancer... Germline BRCA1 ... Germline BRCA2 ... Mutation	Tumor molecular...	18 Years -	Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group
Multifactorial Risk Assessment for Breast & Ovarian Cancer Risk Detection	NCT04668521	Adnexal Mass Germline BRCA1 ... Germline BRCA2 ... Hereditary Brea...	OVA360	18 Years -	Aspira Women's Health

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for germline brca1 gene mutation