Neoplasms

All Conditions

Mouth and Tooth Diseases

Rare Diseases

Carcinoma

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

Mouth Neoplasms

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

Lip Neoplasms

Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Neoplasms, Squamous Cell

Head and Neck Neoplasms

Mouth Diseases

Stomatognathic Diseases

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Oral Cancer

Lip and Oral Cavity Cancer

Patients receive an imaging agent via injection and undergo planar imaging and SPECT/CT over 1-2 hours. Patients then undergo SLN biopsy.

Computed Tomography (CT)

Imaging Agent

Undergo standard elective neck dissection

Neck Dissection

Planar Imaging

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

Site Public Contact

Steven J. Wang

Emre A. Vural

Ellie G. Maghami

Theresa Guo

Fred Baik

Saral Mehra

Francisco J. Civantos

Jennifer Gross

Sandeep Samant

Mihir K. Bhayani

Nitin A. Pagedar

Andres M. Bur

John Pang

Steven B. Chinn

John D. Cramer

Eleanor M. Walker

Aru Panwar

Jennifer R. Cracchiolo

Dylan F. Roden

Ryan P. McSpadden

Umamaheswar Duvvuri

Jamie A. Ku

Amit Agrawal

Rusha J. Patel

Nitya Alluri

Nicholas Purdy

David M. Cognetti

Mark Kubik

Daniel Almquist

William C. Spanos

John P. Gleysteen

Michael C. Topf

Ann M. Gillenwater

Vlad C. Sandulache

Mirabelle Sajisevi

John R. de Almeida

Stephen Y Lai

This phase II/III trial studies how well sentinel lymph node biopsy works and compares sentinel lymph node biopsy surgery to standard neck dissection as part of the treatment for early-stage oral cavity cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy surgery is a procedure that removes a smaller number of lymph nodes from your neck because it uses an imaging agent to see which lymph nodes are most likely to have cancer. Standard neck dissection, such as elective neck dissection, removes many of the lymph nodes in your neck. Using sentinel lymph node biopsy surgery may work better in treating patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer compared to standard elective neck dissection.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related quality of life (QOL) at 6 months after surgery using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) is superior with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy compared to elective neck dissection (END) for treatment of early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) (cT1-2N0). (Phase II) II. To determine if disease-free survival (DFS) is non-inferior with SLN biopsy compared to END for treatment of early-stage OCSCC (cT1-2N0). (Phase III) III. To determine if patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related QOL at 6 months after surgery using NDII is superior with SLN biopsy compared to END for treatment of early-stage OCSCC (cT1-2N0). (Phase III)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare patterns of failure (local-regional relapse and distant metastasis) between surgical arms.

II. To measure and compare overall survival (OS) between surgical arms. III. To measure and compare the toxicity of the two surgical arms.

IV. To measure longitudinal patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related QOL between surgical arms, using the following instruments:

IVa. Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII). IVb. Abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH). IVc. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H\&N). V. To assess the length of hospitalization, post-operative drain placement, and operative morbidity between arms.

VI. To estimate the negative predictive rate of fludeoxyglucose F-18 (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for N0 neck in patients with T1 and T1-2 oral cavity squamous cell cancer (OCSCC) patients in the END arm.

VII. To assess nodal metastases rates between arms. VIII. To assess the pathologic false omission rate (FOR) in the SLN biopsy arm. IX. To determine if patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related QOL at 6 months after surgery using the NDII is superior with the SLN biopsy compared to the END in low-risk patients.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare changes in patient-reported outcomes (European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale Questionnaire \[EQ-5D-5L\]) between surgical arms.

II. To collect biospecimens for future translational science studies. III. To assess the DFS between arms in low-risk patients.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Patients receive an imaging agent via injection and undergo planar imaging and single photo emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) over 1-2 hours. Patients then undergo SLN biopsy.

GROUP II: Patients undergo standard END.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up 3 weeks after surgery, every 3 months for year 1, every 4 months for year 2, every 6 months for year 3, then yearly thereafter.

Comparing Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Biopsy With Standard Neck Dissection for Patients With Early-Stage Oral Cavity Cancer

Randomized Phase II/III Trial of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Elective Neck Dissection for Early-Stage Oral Cavity Cancer

Will be evaluated and compared using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), a 10-item tool between the two treatment arms. It is assumed that a 7.5-point (change from Baseline to 6 months) between arm difference is clinically meaningful. The hypothesis of no between-arm difference in 6-month NDII scores will be tested using the ANCOVA model at one-sided significance level of 0.10. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the mean NDII scores at 6 months for each treatment arm and for the between-arm difference at 6-months based on the proposed model will be provided.

An event for disease-free survival is local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death due to any cause. Disease-free survival time is randomization date to the date of event or last known follow-up (censoring). Rates will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and between-arm differences compared using the log-rank test.

An event for overall survival is death due to any cause. Overall survival time is randomization date to date of event or last known follow-up (censoring). Rates will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and between-arm differences compared using the log-rank test.

An event for local-regional failure is local or regional recurrence. Local-regional failure time is randomization date to date of event, precluding event, or last known follow-up (censoring). Rates will be estimated using the cumulative incidence method and between arm differences compared using cause-specific log-rank test.

An event is the occurrence of distant metastasis. Distant metastasis time is randomization to date of event, precluding event, or last known follow-up (censoring). Rates will be estimated using the cumulative incidence method and between-arm differences compared using cause-specific log-rank test.

Patient reported using Abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) with scores of 0-100. A higher score indicates greater disability.

Will be measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H\&N) to measure Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck-Trial Outcome Index (FACT-TOI) scores on a scale from 0-96. A higher score indicates better quality of life.

Defined as the proportion of patients with pathologic positive nodes using the pathology results.

Measured within the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) arm only. Defined as the proportion of patients with false negative results among negative SLN patients.

Measured by NDII in low-risk oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients using ANCOVA comparison model.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NRG Oncology

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for hard palate squamous cell carcinoma