Neoplasms

Blood and Lymph Conditions

Immune System Diseases

All Conditions

Rare Diseases

Lymphoma

Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Lymphatic Diseases

Immunoproliferative Disorders

Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Lymphosarcoma

Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Antineoplastic Agents

All Drugs and Chemicals

Anti-Infective Agents

Antirheumatic Agents

Gemcitabine

Cytarabine

Fludarabine

Fludarabine phosphate

Rituximab

Lenalidomide

Chlorambucil

Antimetabolites

Immunosuppressive Agents

Immunologic Factors

Angiogenesis Inhibitors

Growth Inhibitors

Investigators choice single agent - Chlorambucil, Rituximab, Cytarabine, Gemcitabine, Fludarabine

For patients with a creatinine clearance of ≥ 60 mL/min: 25 mg daily x 21 days of a 28 day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

For patients who have a moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance is ≥ 30 mL/min but \< 60mL/min: 10 mg daily x 21 days of a 28 day cycle (Cycles 1 and 2). After Cycle 2, if the patient remains free of Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicity, the dose will be increased to 15 mg daily x 21 days of a 28 day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Investigators choice single agent - Chlorambucil, Rituximab, Cytarabine, Gemcitabine, or Fludarabine

Investigators choice single agent

Marek Trneny, MD/PhD/Prof

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide versus investigator choice in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

This research study is for patients who have relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma following treatment such as radiotherapy, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or radioimmunotherapy. Chemotherapy agents such as gemcitabine, cytarabine, chlorambucil, fludarabine, or the immunotherapeutic agent, rituximab, may be proposed. Thus, the aim is to search for new treatments that may improve the prognosis of patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma.

The present clinical study aims at determining if lenalidomide is safe and active in patients with mantle cell lymphoma who are refractory to their treatment or have relapsed once, twice or three times. Enrollment goal was met on March 7th 2013 and thus enrollment was stopped.

A Study to Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized Open-Label Study To Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

PFS was defined as time of randomization to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment.

Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS were defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last completed assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment.

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response (CR), Complete Response unconfirmed (CRu) or Partial Response (PR). Participants who discontinued before any response had been observed or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999; CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses.

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response, Complete Response unconfirmed or Partial Response. Participants who had discontinued before any response has been observed or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999; CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses.

Duration of response was defined as the time from when the first response of CR, CRu, or PR was first achieved until documented tumor progression, or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or die at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free.

Tumor control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Stable disease (SD) is defined as less than a PR (see above) but is not progressive disease or relapsed disease.

Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression. Time to progression did not include deaths. Participants without progression at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new anti-lymphoma treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free.

Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression assessed by the investigator, treatment toxicity, or death. Participants who were on-treatment or completed the treatment according to the protocol were censored at the last date of drug intake.

Time to Response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR) and was calculated only for responding participants. ). Participants with progression at the time of analysis were censored at the first assessment date that the participant was known to have progressed. Participants with SD at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free.

Time to first response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR). Participants with progression at the time of analysis were censored at the first assessment date that the participant was known to have progressed. Participants with SD at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the subject was known to be progression-free.

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Participants alive or lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive.

Adverse events were assessed using National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 3: according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild Adverse Event (AE), Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe and Undesirable AE, Grade 4 = Life-threatening or Disabling AE, and Grade 5 = Death; Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose. A Treatment Emergent Adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).

The EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing a higher quality of life.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing a higher quality of life.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

Celgene

Participants received lenalidomide 25 mg capsules orally every day for 21 days of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance is ≥ 30 mL/min but \< 60mL/min received 10 mg lenalidomide for 21 days of each 28-day cycle (Cycles 1 and 2). After Cycle 2, if the participant remained free of Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicity, the dose was increased to 15 mg lenalidomide for 21 days of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Participants received a single agent investigators choice (IC) of chlorambucil 40 mg/m\^2 PO every 28 days until progressive disease (PD) or toxicity, OR rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 by intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 56-day treatment cycle until PD or toxicity, OR cytarabine 1-2 g/m\^2 by IV infusion on days 1 and 2 of each 28 day treatment cycle; up to 6 cycles, OR gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 by IV infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28 day treatment cycle; up to 6 cycles OR oral fludarabine 40 mg/m\^2 or IV fludarabine 25 mg/m\^2 on days 1 through 5 of each 28-day cycle; up to 6 cycles. Participants were given the option to enter into the lenalidomide crossover phase if PD occurred and received lenalidomide 25 mg capsules daily on days 1 to 21 of each 28 day treatment cycle until PD or toxicity.

Investigator's Choice

Investigators Choice

Total

Age, Continuous

Sex: Female, Male

Race (NIH/OMB)

ECOG performance status is used by doctors and researchers to assess how a subject's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living activities of the subject and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. 0 = Fully Active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out light work; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities; 3 = Capable of only limited self-care; 4 = Completely Disabled, No self-care

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

Ann Arbor staging is the staging system for lymphomas, both in Hodgkin's lymphoma (previously called Hodgkin's disease) and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (abbreviated NHL). Stage I = Involvement of 1 Lymph Node (LN) or extralymphatic region Stage II = ≥ 2 LN sites on the same side of the diaphragm Stage III = LN regions on both sides of the diaphragm; may include spleen and 1 extralymphatic organ Stage IV = involvement of ≥ 1 extralymphatic organs with or without associated LN involvement (diffuse or disseminated)

Stage of Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) at Diagnosis

A prognostic index predictive of the outcome in advanced mantle cell lymphoma

MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) Score at Baseline

Bone marrow involvement (biopsy score) was categorized according to the following observations (Cheson, 1999):

(i) positive, if unequivocal cytologic or architectural evidence of malignancy, (ii) negative, if no aggregates or only a few well-circumscribed lymphoid aggregates, or (iii) indeterminate, if increased number or size of aggregates without cytologic or architectural atypia

Bone Marrow Involvment as Baseline

The intent to treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not.

Anne McClain, Senior Manager, Clinical Trial Disclosure

ITT population included all randomized participants.

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Central Review

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival by Investigator's Assessment at the Final Analysis

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the IRC Central Review

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

The analysis population included participants with an overall response.

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR) According to the IRC Central Review

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

ITT population includes all randomized participants.

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease According to the IRC Central Review

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease at the Final Analysis

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression According to the IRC Central Review

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) as Assessed by the Investigator

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response (TTFR) According to the IRC Central Review

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival (OS) According to the IRC Central Review

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

Any TEAE

Any TEAE Grade 3 AE

Any TEAE Grade 4 AE

Any TEAE Grade 5 AE

Any TEAE Related to the IP

Any Grade 3 AE Related to IP

Any Grade 4 AE Related to IP

Any Grade 5 AE Related to IP

Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

Any SAE Related to IP

Any TEAE Leading to Stopping of IP

Any Treatment Related AE Leading to Stopping IP

TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction/Interruption

Related AE Leading to Dose Reduct/Interruption

TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction

Related AE Leading to Dose Reduction

TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption

Related AE Leading to Dose Interruption

The safety population included participants who received at least one dose of study drug (either lenalidomide or investigator's choice).

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Baseline

Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1

Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1

Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1

Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1

Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation

Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) Evaluable Population includes participants who had evaluable QoL assessments.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization	Link
A Study to Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)	NCT00875667	Mantle Cell Lym... Lymphoma, Mantl...	Lenalidomide Investigators c...	18 Years -	Celgene
A Study to Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)	NCT00875667	Mantle Cell Lym... Lymphoma, Mantl...	Lenalidomide Investigators c...	18 Years -	Celgene

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for investigators choice single agent