Participants in the intervention group will receive 6 months the mobile application (OKTED) for improving symptoms and adherence to oral anticancer agents. The mobile application will consist of three modules. The first module will include OAA-specific information, a calendar in which start/end dates can be record, and a medication reminder. The second module will include information about common and urgent symptoms and recommendations for the management of these symptoms. The last module will comprise a question and answer section.

Participants in the control group will receive standard oncology care only.

Participants appointed to the intervention group will receive the mobile application intervention for six months after enrollment. The mobile app (OKTED) intervention will consist of completing responding to weekly assessments regarding symptoms, side effects, and medication adherence, as well as receiving personalized feedback about responses.

Mobile Application Intervention

The use of oral anticancer agents (OAAs) in cancer treatment has increased especially in the last two decades. The use of mobile health technologies in the management of OAA can be beneficial in terms of treatment adherence and symptom management.The aim of this study is to explore how a Smartphone mobile application can help improve the cancer treatment process in people who are used oral anticancer agents. This study will be done a randomized-controlled trial to test the intervention.

Background: The use of mobile health technologies in the management of OAA can be beneficial in terms of treatment adherence and symptom management.

Objective/Hipothesis: The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of a mobile application on treatment adherence and symptom management in patients using OAA. The following hypotheses (H) will teste in this study:

H0a: A mobile application developed for patients using OAA has not increased treatment adherence.

H1a: A mobile application developed for patients using OAA has increased treatment adherence.

H0b: A mobile application developed for patients using OAA has not decreased the frequency and severity of symptoms.

H1b: A mobile application developed for patients using OAA has decreased the frequency and severity of symptoms.

Study Design: The investigators will recruit and randomly assign 100 patients from the two cancer care sites who have recently been prescribed oral anticancer agents to receive either the mobile app intervention or standard care. Participants will be stratified by age and anticancer treatment ( i.e. simple and complex) regimen. Patients will be follow 6 months. Medication adherence, symptom severity will serve as primary outcomes.

Mobile Application to Assist Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents and Symptom Management

The Effect of a Mobile Application on Treatment Adherence and Symptom Management in Patients Using Oral Anticancer Agents: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The patients' adherence levels will be assess using the Oral Chemotherapy Adherence Scale (OCAS). The OCAS was developed by Bagcivan and Akbayrak (2015), and its Cronbach α coefficient was found to be 0.738. The scale (19 items, 5-point Likert-type) is a valid and reliable scale for adult patients who use OAAs. A total score of 84 and above is interpreted as "good adherence;" a total score of 83 and below is interpreted as "poor adherence".

The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) is a multidimensional tool developed to evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, and distress levels of common cancer-related symptoms over seven days (Cronbach α=0.84). The MSAS is a reliable and valid instrument in the Turkish population. The scale has 32 items and three sub-dimensions: The Global Distress Index, The Physical Symptom Distress Scores, and The Psychologic Symptom Distress Scores. The total MSAS score is the average of the symptom scores of all 32 items. Twenty-four symptoms are evaluated in terms of severity, frequency and distress, and eight symptoms are evaluated in terms of severity and distress. If a symptom was experienced, the patient describes its severity on a 4-point categorical scale; its frequency, if appropriate, on a 4-point categorical scale; and its associated distress on a 5-point categorical scale. Each symptom score is the average of the dimensions (frequency, severity, distress dimensions).

Koç University

Gazi University

Baskent University

Assistant professor

Participants in the intervention group will receive the mobile application for improving symptoms and adherence to oral chemotherapy along with their standard oncology care. The proposed elements of the mobile application include the following: 1) specification of an oral chemotherapy treatment plan; 2) weekly collection of patient-reported symptoms and medication adherence; and 3) delivery of real-time, tailored feedback to patients as well as immediate transmission of survey results to oncology clinicians.

Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive the mobile application intervention for approximately three months after enrollment. The mobile app intervention will consist of completing an initial chemotherapy treatment plan, responding to weekly assessments regarding symptoms, side effects, and medication adherence, as well as receiving personalized feedback about responses. The results from patient surveys within the app will also be transmitted in real-time to the participants' oncology clinicians via a HIPAA-compliant, secure email.

Joseph Greer, Ph.D

Many people treated for cancer receive oral chemotherapy medications for their illness. This means that much of their cancer care occurs at home, away from a traditional oncology care setting. The purpose of this study is to explore how a Smartphone mobile application ("mobile app") can help improve the cancer treatment process in people who are prescribed oral chemotherapy medication. The investigators will explore how well the mobile app helps patients stay connected with their oncology care team, take their oral medications as prescribed, and manage their cancer-related symptoms from home. This study will be done in two phases: 1) a pilot phase to assess the feasibility of a mobile application intervention, and 2) a randomized-controlled trial to test the intervention.

Background: Over the last decade, novel targeted agents have revolutionized the delivery of cancer care and improved survival rates, especially in those with metastatic disease. While oral chemotherapies possess significant advantages with respect to ease of administration, patients and caregivers receive less support for adherence and monitoring of side effects. Therefore, novel interventions are essential to help patients communicate in a more open and timely manner with their oncology clinicians to support adherence. As part of Phase 1 for this Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) grant, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients, clinicians and relevant stakeholders to inform the development of the proposed mobile app intervention. For the randomized-controlled trial, the investigators will recruit and randomly assign 180 adult patients prescribed oral chemotherapy to receive either the intervention (completed smartphone mobile app) or standard care.

Objective/Hypothesis: The goals of this study are to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a mobile application to help improve adherence to oral chemotherapy and symptom to patients with cancer. We will administer the intervention at three cancer centers, hypothesizing that patients with who use the mobile app will report better adherence to their oral chemotherapy and better management of symptoms than those patients who were not assigned to the intervention.

Specific Aims: The primary aims of this study are 1) to implement a patient-centered mobile application to assess symptoms, side effects, and adherence to oral chemotherapy that is feasible for use in oncology patients, and 2) to evaluate the efficacy of the mobile application in improving patient-reported clinical outcomes.

Study Design: We will recruit and randomly assign 180 patients from the three cancer care sites who have recently been prescribed oral chemotherapy to receive either the mobile app intervention or standard care. Participants will be stratified by study site (i.e. Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), North Shore, MGH West, and Emerson Cancer Centers), cancer type, and line of chemotherapy. This will ensure relatively equal percentages of patients from each study site, diagnosis, and line of chemotherapy will be represented in the treatment and control groups. The mobile app intervention which will consist of completing an initial chemotherapy treatment plan with their oncology clinicians, responding to weekly assessments regarding symptoms, side effects, and medication adherence, as well as receiving personalized feedback about responses each week for 12 weeks. Medication adherence, symptom severity, and quality of life will serve as primary outcomes, and we will collect measures of quality cancer care as secondary targets. We will also explore whether particular patient characteristics (i.e. cancer type, demographics) affect patient response to the mobile app intervention.

Mobile Application for Improving Symptoms and Adherence to Oral Chemotherapy in Patients With Cancer

The Morisky Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MMAS-4) - a 4-item questionnaire that assesses medication adherence in the past week by asking patients to indicate "yes" or "no" to each item (self-report). The four items ask patients to self-report whether they forgot to take their oral chemotherapy (OC) medication in the past week, whether they had any problems remembering to take their OC medication in the last week, whether they stopped taking their OC medication when they felt better in the past week, and whether they stopped taking their OC medication when they felt worse in the past week. Participants who answered "yes" to any of the four items were coded as having adherence problems, while those who indicated "no" to all four items were coded as having no adherence problems. Therefore, the count of participants is the number of participants who reported any difficulties with adherence on any of the four items in the past week.

Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) utilizes an electronic pill cap to record the date and time the pill dispenser was opened.

M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI): a 19-item instrument that assesses the most common symptoms and side effects related to cancer and its treatment (self-report). The MDASI uses a 0-10 numerical rating scale for all items to assess the severity and interference of symptoms patients have experienced in the past 24 hours, with 0 being "not present" or "did not interfere" and 10 being "as bad as you can imagine" or "interfered completely". The ratings in the MDASI are averaged into two subscale scores: mean symptom severity (13 symptom items) and mean interference (6 interference items only), with possible scores on both subscales ranging from 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse symptom severity and interference, while lower scores indicate less symptom severity and interference.

Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment - General (FACT-G): a 27-item questionnaire that assesses physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being (self-report). The FACT-G utilizes a five-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Four subscales are computed by taking the sum: physical well-being (7 items; range 0-28), social/family well-being (7 items; range 0-28), emotional well-being (7 items; range 0-24), and functional well-being (7 items; range 0-28). The overall score is the sum of the four subscale scores (range 0-108). Higher scores indicate greater quality of life, while lower scores indicate a worse quality of life.

Description: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Treatment-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Satisfaction (FACIT-TS-PS), 21-items that assesses patient satisfaction with doctor and staff competence, communication, and confidence and trust in providers, as well as overall satisfaction of care (self-report). The FACIT-TS-PS uses a 0-3 numerical rating scale to assess satisfaction with healthcare, with 0 representing the lowest level of satisfaction and 3 representing the highest level of satisfaction. Four subscales are computed by taking the sum: explanations (4 items; range 0-12), interpersonal (3 items, range 0-9), comprehensive care (7 items; range 0-21), nurses (3 items; range 0-9), and trust (4 items; range 0-12). A higher score indicates greater satisfaction with care, while a lower score represents lower satisfaction with care.

Resource Utilization Questionnaire, an adapted 3-item questionnaire inquiring about the number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations over the past three months (self-report). Patients are asked to indicate how many times they have gone to the emergency room in the past three months on a numerical scale ranging from 0 to "5 or more". Scores ranged from 0-5. A higher score represents more frequent emergency department visits, indicating higher resource utilization.

Description: Resource Utilization Questionnaire, an adapted 3-item questionnaire inquiring about the number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations over the past three months (self-report). Patients are asked to indicate how many times they have been admitted to the hospital in the past three months on a numerical scale ranging from 0 to "5 or more". Scores ranged from 0-5. A higher score represents more frequent hospital admissions, indicating higher resource utilization.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Principal Investigator

As advanced cancer is a chronic-type illness, regular fluctuations in cancer-related symptoms, disease worsening, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and deaths are to be expected, are not study-related, and will not be considered or reported as adverse events for the purposes of this study. Adverse events or unanticipated events that were study-related (e.g., security or privacy breaches) were reported to the IRB at the discretion of the PI.

Mobile Application Intervention: Participants assigned to the intervention group received the mobile application intervention for approximately three months after enrollment. The mobile app intervention consisted of completing an initial chemotherapy treatment plan, responding to weekly assessments regarding symptoms, side effects, and medication adherence, as well as receiving personalized feedback about responses. The results from patient surveys within the app were transmitted weekly to the participants' oncology clinicians via a HIPAA-compliant, secure email.

Participants in the control group received standard oncology care only, and completed baseline and post-assessments.

Standard Oncology Care

Total

Age, Continuous

Sex: Female, Male

Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)

White

Asian

African American or Black

Hispanic/Latino/a

Multiracial

Other

Race/Ethnicity, Customized

ECOG performance status was collected from the Electronic Health Record based on oncologists' ratings.

Scoring for the ECOG is as follows, with lower scores indicating a greater performance status:

ECOG 0= Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction ECOG 1= Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work ECOG 2= Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

Type of cancer was collected from the Electronic Health Record

Cancer Type

Type of prescribed oral therapy was collected from the Electronic Health Record.

Oral Therapy Type

Due to a clerical error, the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) was not administered to 31 participants at baseline, which led to fewer cases available for analysis of change in this outcome.

Joseph Greer, PhD

Analysis comparing the number of participants who self-reported adherence problems (i.e., dichotomous MMAS-4 scores) at post-assessment between groups adjusting for baseline self-reported adherence (i.e., dichotomous MMAS-4 scores) and change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis population is the number of participants who completed the post-assessment measure of the MMAS-4

Self-reported Difficulties With Adherence on Any of the Four MMAS-4 Items in the Past Week

Analysis comparing the percentage of medication taken (as recorded by MEMS) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis population is the number of participants who had data available from the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) and completed the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) at both the baseline and post assessments.

Adherence to Oral Chemotherapy Medication

Analysis comparing the change in symptom severity (MDASI-severity) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis comparing the change in symptom interference (MDASI-interference) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post assessment.

Change in Symptom Severity

Change in Symptom Interference

Participants who completed both baseline and post measures of the MDASI and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Due to a clerical error, the MDASI was not administered to 31 pts at baseline. One pt skipped the symptom interference scale, causing a discrepancy in the number of pts completing each subscale on the MDASI.

Change in Symptoms and Side Effects

Analysis comparing the change in overall QOL (FACT-G) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis comparing the change in physical QOL (FACT-Physical Well-Being) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) baseline from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis comparing the change in social QOL (FACT-Social Well-Being) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis comparing the change in emotional QOL (FACT-Emotional Well-Being) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis comparing the change in functional QOL (FACT-Functional Well-Being) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

FACT-General

FACT-Physical Well-Being

FACT-Social Well-Being

FACT-Emotional Well-Being

FACT-Functional Well-Being

Analysis population is the number of participants who completed both baseline and post-assessment measures of the FACT-General (FACT-G) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)

Change in Quality of Life

Analysis comparing change in treatment satisfaction with clinician explanations (FACIT-TS-PS-Clinician Explanations) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis comparing change in satisfaction with interpersonal treatment (FACIT-TS-PS Interpersonal Treatment) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis comparing change in treatment satisfaction with comprehensive care (FACIT-TS-PS Comprehensive Care) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis comparing change in treatment satisfaction with nursing care (FACIT-TS-PS Nursing Care) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis comparing change in treatment satisfaction with trust in clinicians (FACIT-TS-PS Trust in Clinicians) from baseline to post-assessment between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

FACIT-Clinician Explanations

FACIT-Interpersonal Treatment

FACIT-Comprehensive Care

FACIT-Nursing Care

FACIT-Trust in Clinicians

Analysis population is the number of participants who completed both baseline and post-assessment measures of the FACIT-TS-PS and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)

Treatment Satisfaction

Analysis comparing the number of emergency department (ED) visits over the study period between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment.

Analysis population is the number of participants who completed both baseline and post-assessment measures of the Resource Utilization Questionnaire (RUQ) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)

Emergency Department Visits

Analysis comparing the number of hospitalizations over they study period between groups adjusting for change in perceived social support (MSPSS) from baseline to post-assessment

Analysis population is the number of participants who completed both baseline and post-assessment measures of the Resource Utilization Questionnaire (RUQ) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS).

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Mobile Application to Assist Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents and Symptom Management	NCT04626830	Cancer Adherence to Me... Symptom Managem...	Mobile Applicat...	18 Years -	Baskent University
Mobile Application to Assist Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents and Symptom Management	NCT04626830	Cancer Adherence to Me... Symptom Managem...	Mobile Applicat...	18 Years -	Baskent University
Mobile Application for Improving Symptoms and Adherence to Oral Chemotherapy in Patients With Cancer	NCT02157519	Adherence to Me... Cancer	Mobile Applicat...	18 Years -	Massachusetts General Hospital

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for mobile application intervention