Neoplasms

Respiratory Tract (Lung and Bronchial) Diseases

All Conditions

Urinary Tract, Sexual Organs, and Pregnancy Conditions

Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Lung Neoplasms

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Carcinoma

Prostatic Neoplasms

Breast Neoplasms

Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

Breast Diseases

Skin Diseases

Participants in the CRPC cohort in Part A of the study received birabresib 20 mg orally (PO), twice a day (BID), in a fasted state for 21 consecutive days per cycle. Participants received birabresib in continuous cycles up to 24 months.

Participants in the NMC cohort in Part A of the study received birabresib 20 mg PO, BID, in a fasted state for 21 consecutive days per cycle. Participants received birabresib in continuous cycles up to 24 months.

Participants in the TNBC cohort in Part A of the study received birabresib 20 mg PO, BID, in a fasted state for 21 consecutive days per cycle. Participants received birabresib in continuous cycles up to 24 months.

Participants (up to 30) in Part B will receive birabresib at one dose level below the dose currently being administered in Part A of the study. Once the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) from Part A is established, participants in Part B will receive birabresib at the RP2D. Participants will continue receiving birabresib at an assigned/adjusted dose level for continuous cycles up to 24 months.

Administered as an oral capsule in a fasted state

Birabresib

Medical Director

This is a study to determine the recommended dose of birabresib (MK-8628)(formerly known as OTX015) for further studies in participants with advanced nuclear protein in testis (NUT) midline carcinoma (NMC), triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This is a two-part parallel study: Part A will establish the recommended dose by evaluating dose limiting toxicity (DLT), safety, discontinuation, and early efficacy and Part B will enroll participants with NMC only and will evaluate safety and efficacy in this population.

The sponsor decided to terminate the program after evaluation of safety and efficacy data at the dose levels tested (Part A). The decision to discontinue the birabresib program was based on limited efficacy signals and was not due to safety-related concerns. No participants entered or were treated in Part B of the study.

A Dose Exploration Study With Birabresib (MK-8628) in Participants With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors (MK-8628-006)

A Phase IB Dose Exploration Trial With MK-8628, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Proteins, in Subjects With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors

http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

A DLT was any of the following deemed drug related (DR) by investigator: Grade (G)4 hematologic toxicity lasting ≥7 days except thrombocytopenia; G4 thrombocytopenia; G3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; G3 or 4 febrile neutropenia. G4 non-hematologic (NH) toxicity (not laboratory); G3 NH toxicity (not laboratory), nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea lasting \>3 days despite supportive care; G3 or 4 NH laboratory abnormality requiring medical intervention, hospitalization, or persisting \>1 week; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>8X Upper Limit of Normal(ULN); ALT or AST \>5XULN for \>2 weeks; ALT or AST \>3XULN and total bilirubin \>2XULN or international normalization ratio \>1.5; ALT or AST \>3XULN with fatigue, nausea, vomiting, right upper quadrant pain or tenderness, fever, rash and/or eosinophilia (\>5%); DR adverse event leading to discontinuation or \>20% missed planned doses in Cycle 1; DR toxicity causing \>2 week delay in starting Cycle 2; or G5 toxicity.

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is presented.

The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.

ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] 1.1) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions per RECIST 1.1) and lack of progression according to the guidelines for prostate cancer endpoints developed by Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG) 2 as assessed by investigator radiologic review. The number of participants who achieved a CR or PR is presented.

For participants who demonstrated CR or PR, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 until disease progression per RECIST 1.1 and PCWG2 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression per RECIST 1.1. Per PCWG2, progressive disease was defined as a confirmed increase of at least two new lesions on a bone scan. DOR assessments were assessed by investigator radiologic review. The DOR for all participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented.

DCR was defined as the number of subjects with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) as assessed by investigator radiologic review according to RECIST version 1.1 and PCWG2. CR: defined as disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than \<10 mm per RECIST 1.1. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters along with absence of new lesions and disease progression in non-target lesions per RECIST 1.1. SD: defined as, neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study per RECIST 1.1 and lack of a confirmed increase of at least two new lesions on a bone scan per PCWG2. The number of participants who experienced DCR is presented.

Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of Cmax of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. The Cmax of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.

Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of Cmin of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. The Cmin of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.

Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of Tmax of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. The Tmax of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.

Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of t1/2 of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. The t1/2 of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.

Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of Cl/F of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. The Cl/F of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.

Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of Vz/F of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. The Vz/F of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.

Blood samples were obtained at specified time points for the PK analysis of AUC 0-∞ of MK-8628. MK-8628 concentrations were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. The AUC 0-∞ of MK-8628 after oral administration is presented.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Participants in the CRPC cohort in Part A of the study received MK-8628 20 mg PO, BID, in a fasted state for 21 consecutive days per cycle. Participants received MK-8628 in continuous cycles up to 24 months.

MK-8628 20 mg CRPC Cohort-Part A

Participants in the NMC cohort in Part A of the study received MK-8628 20 mg PO, BID, in a fasted state for 21 consecutive days per cycle. Participants received MK-8628 in continuous cycles up to 24 months.

MK-8628 20 mg NMC Cohort-Part A

Participants in the TNBC cohort in Part A of the study received MK-8628 20 mg PO, BID, in a fasted state for 21 consecutive days per cycle. Participants received MK-8628 in continuous cycles up to 24 months.

MK-8628 20 mg TNBC Cohort-Part A

Total

Age, Continuous

Sex: Female, Male

Race (NIH/OMB)

The study was terminated due to limited efficacy and not due to safety reasons. Due to limited PK sampling for t1/2, caution must be exercised when interpreting the results of t1/2, CL/F, and AUC 0-∞ values.

Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development

Participants in Part A of the study that received at least 85% of the planned MK-8628 20 mg dose (18 days) or experienced a DLT during the first 21-day cycle.

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1

Participants (up to 30) in Part B were to receive MK-8628 at one dose level below the dose that was currently being administered in the escalation portion of Part A of the study. Once the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) from Part A was established, participants in Part B were to receive MK-8628 at the RP2D. Participants were to continue receiving MK-8628 at an assigned/adjusted dose level for continuous cycles up to 24 months.

NMC Cohort-Part B

Participants in Part A of the study that received at least 1 dose of MK-8628 20 mg. No participants were enrolled in Part B of the study.

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (AE)

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE

Participants in Part A of the study who received at least one dose of MK-8628 20 mg. No participants were enrolled in Part B of the study.

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Participants in Part A of the study who received at least one dose of MK-8628 20 mg. No participants were enrolled in Part B of the study. Since no participants experienced a CR or PR, DOR could not be calculated.

Duration of Response (DOR)

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

Total number of participants from all 3 cohorts (CRPC+NMC+TNBC) in Part A of the study that received at least 1 dose of MK-8628 20 mg PO, BID, in a fasted state.

MK-8628 20 mg PK Cohort

Total number of participants from all 3 cohorts (CRPC+NMC+TNBC) in Part A of the study that received at least 1 dose of MK-8628 20 mg and had data available for the PK parameter being analyzed.

Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8628

Observed Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of MK-8628

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of MK-8628

Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of MK-8628

Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of MK-8628

Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of MK-8628

MK-8628 20 mg DLT Cohort

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8628 From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC 0-∞)

Participants in the CRPC cohort in Part A of the study received MK-8628 20 mg orally (PO), twice a day (BID), in a fasted state for 21 consecutive days per cycle. Participants received MK-8628 in continuous cycles up to 24 months.

Overall Study

Blood and Lymph Conditions

Rare Diseases

Leukemia

Leukemia, Myeloid

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Hematologic Diseases

Myeloid Leukemia

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute Non Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Acute Graft Versus Host Disease

Antineoplastic Agents

All Drugs and Chemicals

Azacitidine

Antimetabolites

Enzyme Inhibitors

OTX015

Vidaza (azacitidine)

This study is designed in its first part (phase Ib) to determine the recommended dose of the OTX015 + Vidaza (azacitidine) combination in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients not candidate for standard intensive induction therapy.

It will be followed by a randomized phase II part to assess the efficacy of the combination using 2 arms : Vidaza (azacitidine) alone vs. OTX015 in combination with Vidaza (azacitidine).

A Study Assessing tOTX015 in Combination With Azacitidine (AZA) or AZA Single Agent in Patients With Newly-diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Not Candidate for Standard Intensive Induction Therapy (SIIT)

A Phase Ib/II Study Assessing the BET-bromodomain (BRD) Inhibitor OTX015 in Combination With Azacitidine (AZA) or AZA Single Agent in Patients With Newly-diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Not Candidate for Standard Intensive Induction Therapy (SIIT)

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization	Link
A Dose Exploration Study With Birabresib (MK-8628) in Participants With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors (MK-8628-006)	NCT02698176	NUT Midline Car... Triple Negative... Non-small Cell ... Castration-resi...	Birabresib	18 Years -	Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
A Study Assessing tOTX015 in Combination With Azacitidine (AZA) or AZA Single Agent in Patients With Newly-diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Not Candidate for Standard Intensive Induction Therapy (SIIT)	NCT02303782	Acute Myeloid L...	OTX015 Vidaza (azaciti...	18 Years -	Oncoethix GmbH, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for otx015

Every month we try and update this database with for otx015 cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for otx015

Every month we try and update this database with for otx015 cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them. We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Every month we try and update this database with for otx015 cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.