Neoplasms

Urinary Tract, Sexual Organs, and Pregnancy Conditions

All Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Genital Neoplasms, Male

Urogenital Neoplasms

Genital Diseases

Genital Diseases, Male

Urogenital Diseases

Prostatic Diseases

Male Urogenital Diseases

All Drugs and Chemicals

Coagulants

Vaccines

Immunomodulating Agents

Protamines

Keyhole-limpet hemocyanin

Patients will be vaccinated intranodally three times biweekly with mDC (5x 106 cells; n=7, arm A). DC will be loaded with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I binding peptides of tumor antigens and NY-ESO-1 and MUC1 PepTivator® which covers the complete antigen. DC will be stimulated with protamine/mRNA and loaded with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) as an immune control.

Patients will be vaccinated intranodally three times biweekly with pDC (3x 106 cells; n=7, arm B). DC will be loaded with MHC class I binding peptides of tumor antigens and NY-ESO-1 and MUC1 PepTivator® which covers the complete antigen. DC will be stimulated with protamine/mRNA.

Patients will be vaccinated intranodally three times biweekly with the combination of mDC and pDC (5x 106 mDC/ 3x 106 pDC; n=7, arm C). DC will be loaded with MHC class I binding peptides of tumor antigens and NY-ESO-1 and MUC1 PepTivator® which covers the complete antigen. DC will be stimulated with protamine/mRNA and loaded with KLH (mDC only) as an immune control.

mDC vaccination

pDC vaccination

mDC and pDC vaccination

Winald R Gerritsen, MD PhD

Fred Witjes, MD PhD

Jolanda IM de Vries, PhD

Prostate cancer is the only type of cancer in which conventional dendritic cells (DC) treatment has a beneficial effect on the overall survival. In this study investigators aim to show immunologic efficacy of tumor-peptide loaded natural DC in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC).

The immunomonitoring will include:

1. functional response and tetramer analysis of delayed-type hypersensitivity infiltrating lymphocytes against tumor peptides and
2. type I interferon (IFN) gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and
3. proliferative, effector cytokine- and humoral responses to keyhole limpet hemocyanin, a immunogenic protein providing T cell help.

The secondary objectives are the safety and feasibility of natural DC vaccinations, the influence on the quality of life during treatment with natural DC, and the clinical efficacy of treatment.

Immunotherapy with DC vaccines Prevention of infectious diseases through immunization is one of the greatest achievements of modern medicine. Nonetheless, considerable challenges remain for improving the efficacy of existing vaccines for therapeutic immunizations for diseases such as cancer. More than 10 years ago the first groups introduced tumor antigen-loaded DC-based vaccines in the clinic. Effective immune responses and favorable clinical outcomes have indeed been observed. Thus far, mainly conventional in vitro generated monocyte-derived DCs (moDC) have been used in clinical trials worldwide. Long lasting tumor specific T cell-mediated immunological responses are clearly linked to increased progression free survival as well as overall survival.

However, moDC may not be the optimal source of DCs for DC vaccination studies, due to extensive culture periods and compounds required to obtain mature moDC. Two principal subsets of human blood DC, called plasmacytoid DC (pDC) and myeloid DC (mDC), are possibly a better alternative since they do not require extensive culture periods and are directly isolable from the peripheral-blood. Based on promising immunological and clinical outcome with pDC and mDC vaccinations in metastatic melanoma patients, further testing of these blood DC subsets is warranted. Based on these observations investigators are convinced that pDC and mDC employ different, and probably more optimal mechanisms to combat cancer. In addition, based on in vitro data and preclinical studies that suggest that natural DC act synergistically, investigators hypothesize that the combination of pDC and mDC may induce stronger anti-tumor immune responses as compared to pDC or mDC alone.

Immunotherapy in prostate cancer Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous cancer in men. In recent years novel therapies have been studied extensively. Prostate cancer is usually diagnosed in men above 65 years of age. Depending on the severity of the disease, current treatment options for prostate cancer consist of active surveillance, prostatectomy, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, or chemotherapy. Up to one-third of patients with a localized tumor eventually fails on local therapy and progress to advanced-stage or metastatic disease within 10 years. Although the majority of patients initially respond to anti-androgens, most tumors become resistant within 14 to 30 months. For men with mCRPC the median survival in phase III studies range from 15 to 19 months. The chemotherapeutic drug docetaxel was for several years the only treatment option for mCRPC, resulting in a median overall survival benefit of two to three months compared to mitoxantrone. In the past five years second-line chemotherapy (cabazitaxel), second-generation androgen deprivation therapy (abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and enzalutamide), cellular immunotherapy (sipuleucel-T), and a targeted alpha emitter (radium-223 treatment) have expanded the treatment repertoire for mCRPC.

Sipuleucel-T, a DC-based vaccine for patients suffering from prostate cancer, has shown to be clinically effective and is approved by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for mCRPC patients. A major advantage of cellular immunotherapy when compared to chemotherapy, and even androgen deprivation therapy, is its low toxicity. Several other immunotherapeutic approached have been investigated and potential tumor antigens have been identified. Prostvac (vaccinia-prostate-specific antigen) was administered in a randomized phase II study with encouraging results. Ipilimumab had promising results in several phase II studies and in combination with a vaccine, such as GVAX. However, in a phase III study post-chemotherapy trial ipilimumab seemed not superior to placebo. Hence, only sipuleucel-T had clinical significant results in clinical trials.

The promising immunological and clinical outcome with pDC and mDC in metastatic melanoma warrants further testing of these blood DC in prostate cancer. In this study investigators aim to show proof-of-principle of natural DC immunogenicity in prostate cancer patients: induction/enhancement of tumor-specific T cells by mDC and induction of an IFN signature by pDC. Investigators will also get insight if combining subsets improves immunogenicity and clinical outcome. Hence, there is an urgent need for a potent treatment modality together with a solid predictive and prognostic biomarker.

Natural Dendritic Cells for Immunotherapy of Chemo-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

A Randomized Phase IIa Study: Natural Dendritic Cells for Immunotherapy of Chemo-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

Data will be shared after all clinical and immunological data collection and analysis in a scientific publication.

a.functional response and tetramer analysis of delayed-type hypersensitivity infiltrating lymphocytes against tumor peptides.

b.type I interferon (IFN) gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

c.proliferative, effector cytokine- and humoral responses to keyhole limpet hemocyanin, a immunogenic protein providing T cell help.

Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE version 4.0 and establishing the feasibility of the st-udy protocol by looking at the enrollment duration. The CTCAE version 4.0 displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each adverse event (AE) based on this general guideline:

Grade 1 Mild AE Grade 2 Moderate AE Grade 3 Severe AE Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 Death related to AE

Quality of life measured with EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. A higher functional scale score represents a higher level of functioning. A high score for Global Health Status represents a high HRQoL. A high symptom or single-item score represents a high symptomatology level. A clinically relevant difference was defined by a mean change of at least 10 points on a scale score

Quality of life measured with EORTC-QLQ-PR25 questionnaire. A higher score on functioning-related domains is indicative for better functioning, where a higher symptom-related domain score is indicative for more symptomatology. Sexual functioning questions required reversing of the response categories for 3 of 4 questions (question number 23-25). In line with the EORTC-QLQ-C30, a clinically relevant difference was defined by a mean change of at least 10 points on a scale scores.

Quality of life measured with BDI (PC) questionnaire. The BDI-PC questionnaire is one of the rating scales for identifying a mood disorder in medical outpatients. BDI-PC is a seven item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 21. Scores of 4 or higher are suggestive for a clinical relevant depression.

Quality of life measured with CIS20-R questionnaire. The CIS-20R is a self-report questionnaire assessing 20 items incarcerating four fatigue dimensions (subjective experience of fatigue (CIS1), reduction in concentration (CIS2), reduction in motivation (CIS3) and reduction in activity (CIS4)). Patients rated the extent to which each statement was true for the previous two weeks on a 7-category scale (ranging from score 1 'Yes, that is true' to 7 'No, that is not true'). A CIS1 score of 35 of higher indicates severe fatigue. A score between 27 and 35 represents an increased risk for fatigue.

PSA progression will be defined according to the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria.

To evaluate PFS: serum PSA value will be determined every 6 weeks and a magnetic resonance imaging lymphangiography (MRL) will be performed every 3 months (combined with a 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT scan at t=0 and t=3 months, and for long responders to therapy at t=12 months and t=24 months). PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the detection of progressive disease on MRL/68-Ga-PSMA-PET/CT scan or immune-related progressive disease, including new measurable lesions reported on successive MRLs. According to the PCWG2 criteria. In case of disease progression during vaccination the patient will be withdrawn from the study. In case of stable disease after three rounds of vaccinations follow-up with MRL will be performed until 24 months after study enrollment.

OS will be determined at the end of study follow-up. The patient's general practitioner will be contacted for OS analysis.

Defined by 1 or more point decline in WHO/ECOG performance score

Determined on MRI scans/68-Ga-PSMA-PET/CT scan

Feasibility of participant recruitment and the collection of immunological and clinical data within the time frame of 18 months.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for pdc vaccination