Neoplasms

All Conditions

Urinary Tract, Sexual Organs, and Pregnancy Conditions

Symptoms and General Pathology

Rare Diseases

Carcinoma

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Ischemia

Kidney Neoplasms

Urologic Neoplasms

Urogenital Neoplasms

Urogenital Diseases

Female Urogenital Diseases

Pregnancy Complications

Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications

Kidney Diseases

Urologic Diseases

Male Urogenital Diseases

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Anti-Inflammatory Agents

Antirheumatic Agents

Analgesics

All Drugs and Chemicals

Natriuretic Agents

Coagulants

Chrysarobin

Mannitol

Hemostatics

Fibrin Tissue Adhesive

Fluorophosphate

Diuretics

1. Inclusion criteria fulfilled:

   * Baseline Abdomen CT/MRI
   * Patient Age, Weight, Height, Co-Medication
   * Informed Consent
   * Baseline renal function (eGFR, renal scintigraphy, sCreatinine, creatinine clearance)
2. During hospitalization, one day before laparoscopic partial nephrectomy:

   * eGFR
   * sCreatinine
   * Hemoglobin
3. After surgery:

   * Assessment of eGFR 4 days after operation
   * Hb assessment every 6 H in the first 48 H
   * Assessment of adverse events
   * Histological Results
4. 6, 12, 24 months after intervention:

   * Creatinine Clearance (only performed at 6 months follow-up)
   * Tc-99m MAG3Dynamic Scintigraphy (only performed at 6 months follow-up)
   * eGFR
   * Assessment of adverse events
   * Assessment of possible recurrence
   * Assesment of kidney volume variation

1. Inclusion criteria fulfilled:

   * Baseline Abdomen CT/MRI
   * Patient Age, Weight, Height, Co-Medication
   * Informed Consent
   * Baseline renal function (eGFR, renal scintigraphy, sCreatinine, creatinine clearance)
2. During hospitalization, one day before robot assisted partial nephrectomy:

   * eGFR
   * sCreatinine
   * Hemoglobin
3. After surgery:

   * Assessment of eGFR 4 days after operation
   * Hb assessment every 6 H in the first 48 H
   * Assessment of adverse events
   * Histological Results
4. 6, 12, 24 months after intervention:

   * Creatinine Clearance (only performed at 6 months follow-up)
   * Tc-99m MAG3Dynamic Scintigraphy (only performed at 6 months follow-up)
   * eGFR
   * Assessment of adverse events
   * Assessment of possible recurrence
   * Assesment of kidney volume variation

The renal hilus is identified and both vein and artery are dissected. A laparoscopic ultrasound probe is introduced through a 12 mm port to define the tumor resection margins. A laparoscopic Satinsky clamp is used to induce total kidney ischemia, clamping both vein and artery. Athermal resection of the tumor is performed and titanium clips are used to close interlobar or arcuate arteries encountered during resection. The defect is closed with stitches secured by Hem-o-Lok clips and haemostatic glue. Ischemia is interrupted once renorrhaphy is completed

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

The renal hilus is carefully dissected, so that the arterial segmental branches are reached. Tumor resection margins are identified through ultrasound. Drop-in bulldog clamps are used to clamp segmental arterial branches and induce selective ischemia. Indocyanine green 0.2-0.3mg/KG is infused intravenously a few seconds after the selective ischemia is induced. The Firefly near infra-red fluorescence system is used to determine the extent of the ischemic area. The ischemic zone can now be tailored to the tumor by adding or removing bulldog clamps according to the vascular anatomical conditions. Athermal resection of the tumor is performed and titanium clips are used to close interlobar or arcuate arteries encountered during resection. The resection defect is closed with stitches secured by Hem-o-Lok clips and haemostatic glue. Selective ischemia will be interrupted once renorrhaphy is completed

Robot assisted partial nephrectomy

Endoscope, Scissor, Needleholder, Forceps, Suction unit, Ports, Tissel, CO2, Sutures, Needles, Scalpel, Ultrasound-Probe, Monitors

Conventional laparoscopic instruments

Da Vinci Robot, Console, Ports and Instruments; Suction unit, Forceps, Tisseel, Ultrasound Probe, Monitors

Da- Vinci Robot and conventional laparoscopic instruments

Agostino Mattei, Ass. Prof.

Currently, partial nephrectomy (PN) is considered as the gold standard treatment modality for small renal masses. In this setting, robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic approaches are gaining more consensus every day. However, until now, no superiority of one technique over the other has yet been demonstrated, especially on postoperative function recovery.

This study compares oncological and functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus robot assisted partial nephrectomy.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 2-3% of all cancers, with the highest incidence in Western countries. Due to increased detection of tumors by ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT), the number of incidentally diagnosed RCCs has increased. These tumors are usually smaller and of lower stage. Currently, partial nephrectomy (PN) is considered as the gold standard treatment modality for small renal masses. In this setting, robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic approaches are gaining more consensus every day. However, until now, no superiority of one technique over the other has yet been demonstrated, especially on postoperative function recovery. This is a single center prospective randomized trial investigating the functional and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robot-assisted) nephron sparing surgery. Patients will be assessed with renal scintigraphy and 24 hours creatinine clearance pre- and postoperatively. Furthermore, duration of the operation, resection and suturing times will be assessed. Renal function recovery is defined as primary endpoint; oncological outcome and positive surgical margin rate are defined as secondary measures. In addition, kidney volume variation will be calculated to describe the amount of healthy tissue preserved in both procedures.The aim of the study is to assess whether robot assisted partial nephrectomy in selective ischemia is superior to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in global ischemia in terms of functional and oncological outcomes.

Assessment of Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) in Selective Ischemia Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy (LPN) in Total Ischemia: Prospective Randomized Study to Assess Oncological and Functional Outcomes

Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil

Luzerner Kantonsspital

Ass. Prof. Dr. med.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization	Link
Assessment of Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy	NCT02924922	Kidney Neoplasm...	Laparoscopic pa... Robot assisted ... Conventional la... Da- Vinci Robot... Mannitol	18 Years -	Luzerner Kantonsspital
Assessment of Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy	NCT02924922	Kidney Neoplasm...	Laparoscopic pa... Robot assisted ... Conventional la... Da- Vinci Robot... Mannitol	18 Years -	Luzerner Kantonsspital

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for robot assisted partial nephrectomy