Neoplasms

Respiratory Tract (Lung and Bronchial) Diseases

All Conditions

Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Urinary Tract, Sexual Organs, and Pregnancy Conditions

Rare Diseases

Lung Neoplasms

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Carcinoma

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

Breast Neoplasms

Melanoma

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Adenocarcinoma

Kidney Neoplasms

Urologic Neoplasms

Urogenital Neoplasms

Urogenital Diseases

Female Urogenital Diseases

Pregnancy Complications

Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications

Kidney Diseases

Urologic Diseases

Male Urogenital Diseases

Head and Neck Neoplasms

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Blood samples will be collected at baseline(Visit 1), and during therapy at visit 2 (around one month after the treatment starting) and at Visit 3 (around three months after the treatment starting. And, optionally, in case of a disease progression (PD).

single arm

It is nowadays well established that the immune system can profoundly influence disease outcome in cancer patients. Increasing evidence is indeed showing that patients displaying spontaneous T cell-mediated immune response against their tumor (defined as immune surveillance) have higher chance to respond to therapies and display globally better prognosis. Conversely, patients whose tumor is characterized by immunosuppression, usually involving myeloid cells and chronic inflammation pathways, often undergo rapid progression and rarely benefit from therapy. Hence, capturing the immune features of individual tumors can help to predict disease course and tailor the therapeutic workup in clinical setting.

It is nowadays well established that the immune system can profoundly influence disease outcome in cancer patients. Increasing evidence is indeed showing that patients displaying spontaneous T cell-mediated immune response against their tumor (defined as immune surveillance) have higher chance to respond to therapies and display globally better prognosis. Conversely, patients whose tumor is characterized by immunosuppression, usually involving myeloid cells and chronic inflammation pathways, often undergo rapid progression and rarely benefit from therapy. Hence, capturing the immune features of individual tumors can help to predict disease course and tailor the therapeutic workup in clinical setting. In addition, overcoming cancer-related immunosuppression could provide a valid tool to rescue immune surveillance and implement cancer treatment through the engagement of the immunological control.

Delivering the right cure to the right patient is the base of precision medicine, and intensive efforts are ongoing worldwide to include the assessment of immune features unto individual patient profiling. However, despite the enormous amount of preclinical and clinical data proving the pivotal role of immunity in molding disease outcome, the immune-related assays that have been introduced into clinical practice, are still scantly. One major limitation is related to the fact that most immune biomarkers have been so far evaluated at tumor site, which implies the need for tumor biopsies and limitations related to intra-lesion heterogeneity. Instead, tests relying on blood samples are easier to perform, more reliable in terms of reproducibility, and repeatable for longitudinal studies. Of note, it is nowadays well established that cancer immunity is a systemic process involving different peripheral immune organs (lymph nodes, bone marrow and spleen) and, as such, it can be measured in blood. Hence, circulating immune cells might represent an informative source of biomarkers to reveal the type and activation status of immunity at single patient level. This holds particularly true for tumor-related immunosuppression, which is mostly mediated myeloid cells and it is responsible for blunting antitumor T cell immune-surveillance. Early during carcinogenesis, cancer cells establish a tight cross-talk with the bone marrow, mediated by tumor-released soluble factors that influence myelopoiesis. This process results in the introduction into the peripheral circulation, of aberrant immunosuppressive myeloid cells, globally known as Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC). MDSC are among the most potent allies of the tumor cells, whose growth and progression in vivo in favored by MDSC ability to inhibit antitumor T cells, promote angiogenesis and sustain metastatic spread. High numbers of MDSC in blood and tumor site of cancer patients is reproducibly associated with poor prognosis and resistance to therapy, including immunotherapy. Studies in preclinical models have also shown that in vivo removal of MDSC reduces tumor expansion in vivo and confers sensitivity to treatment including immunotherapy, indicating a promising role of these cells as appealing novel therapeutic target in cancer. Unfortunately, the phenotypic and functional features of human MDSC are still poorly understood and need to be extensively investigated in clinical setting.

The members of the SERPENTINE Consortium have substantially contributed to the discovery and the study of MDSC in cancer, acquiring deep knowledge on the phenotypic and functional features of these cells both in human and murine setting. In the present trial? coordinators are committed to translate the predictive/prognostic role of MDSC immune profiling into real-life clinical practice. Through the concerted effort of all Consortium members and the prospective enrolment of blood samples from a comprehensive cancer patients case set, coordinators are going to develop off-the-shelf predictive/prognostic test based on the standardized quantification of MDSC in peripheral blood of cancer patients. In addition, thanks to our multiple expertise, coordinators are going to get deep insights into the biology of human cancer-related MDSC, for the development of novel therapeutic approaches based on rescuing tumor immune surveillance by antagonizing immunosuppression.

This is a multi-centric prospective observational study, testing whether the blood level of MDSC-related immunosuppression does correlate with clinical outcome (clinical response by RECIST criteria, PFS, DFS) and thus may help predicting sensitivity or resistance to therapy in cancer patients. In addition, blood samples will be extensively studied to gain insights into the molecular and metabolic pathways regulating myeloid-mediated immunosuppression, with the goal of defining novel targets of immunomodulation.

Quantifying Systemic Immunosuppression to Personalize Cancer Therapy

Correlation of myeloid-related blood biomarkers (including quantification of myeloid cell subsets in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and whole blood) with disease outcome including objective response to therapy, progression-free survival and overall survival, to identify tool for predicting resistance to treatment and poor prognosis.

Transcriptional signatures identified on PBMC and sorted myeloid cells form whole blood, at baseline or first evaluation

Metabolomic profiles, as defined by the concentration of individual metabolites or cluster of metabolites implicated in amino acid and lipid metabolism

Loneliness Questionnaire (no min and max values)

Socio-Economical Questionnaire (no min and max values)

Fondazione IRCCS ISTITUTO NAZIONALE TUMORI

Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle

Cholangiocarcinoma

Klatskin Tumor

Bile Duct Cancer

Anti-Inflammatory Agents

All Drugs and Chemicals

ABC294640

Mark L Levitt, MD, PhD

Vered Katz Ben-Yair, MSc

This is an expanded access program (EAP) for eligible participants who do not qualify for participation in, or who are otherwise unable to access, the ongoing clinical trial ABC-108. This program is designed to provide access to ABC294640 (Yeliva ®) for treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) prior to approval by the local regulatory agency. Availability will depend on territory eligibility. Participating sites will be added as they apply for and are approved for the EAP. An oncologist must decide whether the potential benefit outweighs the risk of receiving an investigational therapy based on the individual patient's medical history and program eligibility criteria.

Expanded Access for the Treatment of Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With ABC294640 (Yeliva ®)

Expanded Access to ABC-108, A Phase IIA Study of ABC294640 in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced,Unresectable Intra-hepatic, Perihilar and Extra-Hepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

RedHill Biopharma Limited

Blood and Lymph Conditions

Immune System Diseases

Symptoms and General Pathology

Lymphoma

Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Disease Progression

Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Lymphatic Diseases

Immunoproliferative Disorders

Disease Attributes

Lymphosarcoma

Antineoplastic Agents

Antirheumatic Agents

Bendamustine Hydrochloride

Rituximab

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating

Alkylating Agents

Dose of 120 mg/m2/day on Day 1 and Day 2 of each treatment cycle (every 21 days), to a maximum of 8 cycles.

Bendamustine

Huaqing Wang, Master

Jian J Yu, Master

Huaqing Wang, master

The purpose of this study is to determine whether bendamustine HCl for injection is safe and effective in the treatment of Rituximab refractory or relapsed B-cell indolent lymphoma.

This is multicenter, open label study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bendamustine HCl in patients with indolent Non-hodgkin's lymphoma and relapsed after rituximab treatment. This injection will be given through i.v. infusion in \>= 60 minutes on days 1 and 2 of every 21-day treatment cycle. Patients will be treated for up to 8 cycles unless progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity take place. Patients will be followed for up to 1 year before evaluating progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Safety and Efficacy Study of Bendamustine to Treat Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

A Multicenter, Single Arm Clinical Trial in Patients With Rituximab Refractory B-cell Indolent Lymphoma

Shandong Lanjin Pharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd

Leukemia

Leukemia, Myeloid

Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive

Hematologic Diseases

Myeloproliferative Disorders

Bone Marrow Diseases

Chronic Disease

Myeloid Leukemia

Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders

Gastrointestinal Agents

Amino Acids

Nilotinib

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Imatinib Mesylate

Lactitol

Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Enzyme Inhibitors

Tyrosine

Patients with minimum 3 years of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment (first with imatinib and then switched to nilotinib) since initial diagnosis, at least 2 years of nilotinib treatment prior to study entry and who achieved MR4.5 (local laboratory assessment) during nilotinib treatment, and determined by a Novartis designated central PCR lab assessment at screening

Nilotinib was dosed by weight or body surface area.

Nilotinib 300 mg BID or 400 mg BID was be administered orally at approximately 12 hour intervals, and must not have been taken with food. The capsules were to be swallowed whole with water.

No food should have been consumed for at least 2 hours before the dose was taken and no additional food should have been consumed for at least one hour after the dose was taken. Patients were also allowed to enter this study on the same dose they were taking prior to study entry. Patients who required permanent dose reduction from their original starting dose were to be allowed to enter this study on the same dose only if the patient maintained this dose for a minimum of 6 months prior to study entry.

nilotinib

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A clinical research study to find out if it is safe to stop the drug nilotinib (Tasigna) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Patients who started treatment with imatinib (Gleevec) when they were first diagnosed with CML, then switched to nilotinib (Tasigna) for at least 2 years with the combined time on imatinib (Gleevec) and nilotinib (Tasigna) for at least 3 years and have very small amount of leukemia cells remaining after the nilotinib (Tasigna) treatment will qualify for the study.

The Primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients in TFR within 48 weeks following nilotinib cessation.

This study originally consisted of seven phases (five treatment phases and two treatment-free phases) from which two were the focus of this primary analysis report (consolidation, TFR and treatment re-initiation) The study consisted of 2 main phases: Consolidation and TFR

Nilotinib treatment consolidation phase (NTCS): Patients who satisfied all inclusion/exclusion criteria were enrolled in the consolidation phase and continued to receive nilotinib for 52 weeks at the dose which the patient was receiving prior to study entry. If a patient maintained MR4.5 throughout the consolidation phase, he/she was eligible to enter in the TFR phase. If a patient had confirmed loss of MR4.5 during the consolidation phase, he/she was not eligible to enter in the TFR phase and continued nilotinib treatment.

Nilotinib TFR phase: Patients who were eligible to enter in the TFR phase after completing the 52 week consolidation phase stopped taking nilotinib on the first day of the TFR phase. Duration of this phase was up to 520 weeks after the last patient enters in the TFR phase.

Nilotinib treatment re-initiation phase (NTRI): If a patient had a confirmed loss of MR4 (two consecutive BCR-ABL \>0.01% IS) or loss of MMR (BCR-ABL \>0.1% IS) in the TFR phase, the patient restarted nilotinib treatment. Patients will be on nilotinib treatment for up to 520 weeks after the last patient entered the nilotinib TFR phase, or until a patient experience unacceptable toxicity, disease progression and/or treatment discontinued at the discretion of the Investigator or if the patient withdrew consent. Nilotinib cessation was not attempted for a second time in the patient who reinitiated treatment or discontinued following the TFR phase.

Nilotinib treatment continuation phase (NTCT) and Nilotinib treatment prolonged continuation phase (NTCT-P): Patients who were not eligible to enter into the TFR phase after completing the 52-week NTCS phase entered the nilotinib treatment continuation (NTCT) phase and would continue treatment with nilotinib for another 52 weeks (a total of 104 weeks of treatment). Patients who were not able to maintain MR4.5 and had a confirmed loss of MR4.5 during the NTCT phase were not eligible to enter the TFR-2 phase. These patients entered into the nilotinib prolonged treatment continuation phase (NTCT-P) and continued nilotinib treatment until 520 weeks after the last patient entered the nilotinib TFR phase, or until the patients experience unacceptable toxicity, disease progression and/or treatment would be discontinued at the discretion of the Investigator or withdrawal of consent.

Nilotinib TFR-2 phase: Patients who maintained MR4.5 during the NTCT phase were eligible to cease nilotinib treatment and enter the TFR-2 phase. The duration of the nilotinib TFR-2 phase is up to 520 weeks after the last patient entered the TFR phase. Patients stopped taking nilotinib therapy on the day they entered the TFR-2 phase.

Nilotinib treatment re-initiation-2 (NTRI-2): If a patient had a loss of MMR or a confirmed loss of MR4 during the TFR-2 phase, he/she entered the nilotinib treatment re-initiation-2 (NTRI-2) phase and resumed nilotinib treatment at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg bid.

Safety follow-up was performed within 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or the last day in TFR/TFR-2.

Post-treatment follow-up visits were performed every 12 weeks up to 520 weeks after the last patient entered the nilotinib TFR phase.

Treatment-free Remission After Achieving Sustained MR4.5 on Nilotinib (ENESTop)

A Phase II, Single Arm, Open Label Study of Treatment-free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Chronic Phase (CP) Patients After Achieving Sustained MR4.5 on Nilotinib

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

TFR is defined as no confirmed loss of MR4 (Molecular response 4.0 log reduction from baseline) or loss of MMR (major molecular response) and no re-starting of nilotinib therapy within 12 months following cessation of nilotinib. Confirmed loss of MR4 is two consecutive BCR-ABL \> 0.01% IS. Loss of MMR does not require confirmation. Percentage of patients in TFR is calculated by dividing the number of patients with no documented confirmed loss of MR4, no documented loss of MMR and no re-starting of nilotinib therapy in the first 48 weeks after starting nilotinib TFR phase by the number of patients who entered nilotinib TFR phase, and multiplied by 100.

TFR is defined as no confirmed loss of MR4 (molecular response 4.0 log reduction from baseline) or loss of MMR (major molecular response) and no re-starting of nilotinib therapy within 12 months following cessation of nilotinib. Confirmed loss of MR4 is two consecutive BCR-ABL \> 0.01% IS. Loss of MMR does not require confirmation. Percentage of patients in TFR is calculated by dividing the number of patients with no documented confirmed loss of MR4, no documented loss of MMR and no re-starting of nilotinib therapy in the first 96, 144, 192, 264 weeks and within 6,7,8,9 and 10 years after starting nilotinib TFR phase by the number of patients who entered nilotinib TFR phase, multiplied by 100.

Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimation of PFS. PFS is measured from the date of start of nilotinib TFR phase (cessation of nilotinib) to the date of the earliest of the event: progression to AP/BC, or death from any cause. Patients not known to have recurred or died on or before the cut-off date for the KM analysis will have their PFS interval right-censored at the earlier of the date of their last assessment (cytogenetic, hematology or extramedullary) for patients who are still on study and at the date of last contact for patients are in follow-up.

Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimation of TFS is measured from the date of the start of the nilotinib TFR phase to the date of the earliest of the following: loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, re-start of nilotinib treatment, progression to AP/BC or death from any cause. Patients not known to have had any of the events or died on or before the cut-off date for the KM analysis will have their TFS interval right-censored at the earlier of the date of their last assessment (PCR, cytogenetic, hematology or extramedullary) for patients who are still on study and at the date of last contact for patients are in follow-up. A TFS sensitivity analysis will be conducted by considering discontinuation from TFR phase due to any reason as an event, in addition to the events as defined above

Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimation of OS. OS is measured from the date of start of nilotinib TFR phase to the date of death from any cause. If a patient is not known to have died, survival will be censored at the date of last contact.

Descriptive statistics of BCR-ABL over time after re-start of nilotinib therapy. ABL= Abelson leukemia virus and BCR=Break point cluster region

Percentage of patients who are in stable MMR (stable MMR=BCR-ABL ≤ 0.1% IS) at 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, and 432 weeks after achievement of that response in the nilotinib re-initiation phase for 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, and 432 weeks is calculated by dividing the number of patients achieving MMR any time during the nilotinib re-initiation phase and having the same response at 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, and 432 weeks after the first achievement of MMR, irrespective of whether there is loss of MMR in between, by the number of patients who achieved MMR at any time during the nilotinib re-initiation phase, and multiplied by 100.

Percentage of patients who are in stable MR4 (stable MR4=BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01% IS) at 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, and 432 weeks after achievement of that response in the nilotinib re-initiation phase for 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, and 432 weeks is calculated by dividing the number of patients achieving MR4 any time during the nilotinib re-initiation phase and having the same response at 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, and 432 weeks after the first achievement of MR4, irrespective of whether there is loss of MR4 in between, by the number of patients who achieved MR4 at any time during the nilotinib re-initiation phase, and multiplied by 100.

Percentage of patients who are in stable MR4.5 (stable MR4.5=BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032% IS) at 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, and 432 weeks after achievement of that response in the nilotinib re-initiation phase for 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, and 432 weeks is calculated by dividing the number of patients achieving MR4.5 any time during the nilotinib re-initiation phase and having the same response at 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, and 432 weeks after the first achievement of MR4.5, irrespective of whether there is loss of MR4.5 in between, by the number of patients who achieved MR4.5 at any time during the nilotinib re-initiation phase, multiplied by 100.

Any sign or symptom that occurs during the study treatment plus 30 days post treatment.

NTCS Phase

TFR Phase

NTRI Phase

NTCT Phase

TFR-2 Phase

NTRI-2 Phase

nilotinib treatment prolonged continuation

NTCT-P Phase

All Patients

Age, Continuous

Sex: Female, Male

Caucasian

Black

Asian

Native American

Other

Race/Ethnicity, Customized

Safety Set: The safety set included all patients who received at least one dose of study medication in the Consolidation Phase.

Study Director

Full Analysis Set (FAS): FAS included all patients who entered the TFR phase.

Percentage of Patients in Treatment Free Remission (TFR) Within 48 Weeks

Percentage of Patients in Treatment Free Remission (TFR) Within 96, 144, 192, 264 Weeks and Within 6,7,8,9 and 10 Years

Progression Free Survival (PFS) to Accelerated Phase/Blast Crisis (AP/BC) or Death

Treatment Free Survival (TFS)

Overall Survival (OS)

Change in BCR-ABL (Oncoprotein Product of BCR-ABL Fusion Gene) Transcripts After Re-start of Nilotinib Therapy

Percentage of Patients With Stable MMR in Nilotinib Re-initiation Phase

Percentage of Patients With Stable MR4 in Nilotinib Re-initiation Phase

Percentage of Patients With Stable MR4.5 in Nilotinib Re-initiation Phase

Overall Study

Immunomodulating Agents

All participants will receive a mass dose of 40 μg or less of \[68Ga\]-NOTA-hGZP (radioactivity dose of 3 mCi to 8 mCi) and have a PET and CT scan.

\[68Ga\]-NOTA-hGZP is a PET imaging agent.

Single Arm

Colin G Miller, PhD

Lieselotte Bloss, DVM

Chihhsi Kuo, MD

Little Ho, MD

First in Human Safety of \[68Ga\]-NOTA-hGZP PET Imaging in subjects with cancer undergoing treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor either as a monotherapy of in combination I-O therapy

This is a first in human research study (Phase I clinical trial) to test the safety and effectiveness of a new radioactive PET imaging drug and biomarker \[68Ga\]-NOTA-hGZP. It is a multi-center, open label, non-randomized, two dose study to evaluate the safety of \[68Ga\]-NOTA-hGZP and the ability to predict the clinical response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy within 2 cycles of treatment.

Multiple center, open label, non-randomized, single dose study, in subjects with cancer undergoing or treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor either as a monotherapy or in combination. subjects. Eligible subjects will receive an injection of \[68Ga\]-NOTA-hGZP pre checkpoint inhibitor administration and a second dose between 5 and 42 days post initial checkpoint inhibitor administration. Upon dosing each subject will undergo PET scans at 40, 60 and 90 minutes post dosing. The images will be analyzed for the distribution of radioactivity. Subjects will be followed for adverse events for approximately 4-6 hours post injection or until pembrolizumab injection plus a follow up phone call to assess adverse events 1-3 days after injection.

Granzyme B PET Imaging Drug as a Predictor of Immunotherapy Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors

First in Human Safety of [68Ga]-NOTA-hGZP- PET Imaging in Subjects Receiving Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy

Clinically significant changes from baseline in physical examination findings

Clinically significant changes from baseline to follow-up analysis in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

Clinically significant changes from baseline to follow-up analysis in heart rate (beats per minute)

Clinically significant changes in respiration rate.

Clinically significant changes from baseline to follow-up analysis in blood chemistry for:

1. Leukocytes (/mcL),
2. Absolute neutrophil count (mcL)
3. Platelets (/mcL)
4. Total bilirubin (mg/d)
5. AST/ALT (unitless)
6. Albumin (g/dL)
7. Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)
8. eGRF (mL/min/1.73 m2)

Clinically significant changes from baseline to follow-up analysis in ECG change in QT (ms) Quantification of \[68Ga\]-NOTA-hGZP PET accumulation at tumor site in subjects after treatment with checkpoint inhibitor therapy as determined by region of interest analysis (SUVmean).

The absolute number of participants with AEs according to CTCAE 5.0

Identification by the central reader of the number of avid lesions observed in each subject and the number of subjects with avid lesions seen on the PET images

To be determined by region of interest analysis the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) (SUV does not have any units)

Compare quantified \[68Ga\]-NOTA-hGZP uptake to participant treatment response in individual lesions as assessed at 6-month clinical follow-up and/or CT assessments.

The number of lesions that were avid and the lesions that showed a decrease in size compared to those which increased in size.

Compare granzyme B protein quantification from biopsied tissue to the \[68Ga\]-NOTA-hGZP PET uptake acquired at the same location.

Massachusetts General Hospital

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Cytosite Biopharma Inc.

Digestive System Diseases

Colorectal Neoplasms

Intestinal Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Digestive System Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Colonic Diseases

Intestinal Diseases

Rectal Diseases

Herbal and Botanical

Antibodies

Antibodies, Monoclonal

Immunoglobulins

Cola

Human IgG2 Monoclonal Antibody. 20mg/kg or 30 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 17 cycles, until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops.

CP-751, 871

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

This study will test if there is any survival benefit in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer that receive CP-751, 871.

Study Using CP-751,871 In Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer That Has Not Responded To Previous Anti-Cancer Treatments

A Phase II, Single Arm Study Of CP-751,871 In Patients With Refractory Metastatic Adenocarcinoma Of The Colon Or Rectum

The 6 month survival probability was defined as the probability of survival at 6 months based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. The time was from date of enrollment to date of death due to any cause. For participants who were last known to be alive, overall survival was censored at the last contact date.

The time from date of enrollment to date of death due to any cause. For participants who were last known to be alive, overall survival was censored at the last contact date.

The period from study entry until disease progression. Participants without progression or death were censored at time of last disease assessment. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target measurable lesions, or a clear increase in a non-target lesion, or the apprearance of new lesions.

Percentage of participants with OR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target disease. PR applied only to participants with at least one measurable lesion. Greater than or equal to 30 % decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions.

The measurement of mean plasma concentration of figitumumab in Day 1 of Cycle 1,2,3,4,5

The immunogenicity of figitumumab in terms of producing an antidrug antibody (ADA) response were monitored.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Quantifying Systemic Immunosuppression to Personalize Cancer Therapy	NCT04941365	Metastatic Mela... Metastatic Brea... Advanced Renal ... Squamous Cell C... Non-small Cell ... Healthy	single arm	18 Years - 90 Years	Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
Expanded Access for the Treatment of Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With ABC294640 (Yeliva ®)	NCT03414489	Cholangiocarcin... Cholangiocarcin... Cholangiocarcin... Cholangiocarcin... Cholangiocarcin...	ABC294640	18 Years -	RedHill Biopharma Limited
Safety and Efficacy Study of Bendamustine to Treat Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma	NCT01570049	Non-Hodgkin Lym...	Bendamustine	18 Years - 75 Years	Shandong Lanjin Pharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd
Treatment-free Remission After Achieving Sustained MR4.5 on Nilotinib (ENESTop)	NCT01698905	Chronic Myeloid...	nilotinib	18 Years -	Novartis
Expanded Access for the Treatment of Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With ABC294640 (Yeliva ®)	NCT03414489	Cholangiocarcin... Cholangiocarcin... Cholangiocarcin... Cholangiocarcin... Cholangiocarcin...	ABC294640	18 Years -	RedHill Biopharma Limited
Safety and Efficacy Study of Bendamustine to Treat Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma	NCT01570049	Non-Hodgkin Lym...	Bendamustine	18 Years - 75 Years	Shandong Lanjin Pharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd
Granzyme B PET Imaging Drug as a Predictor of Immunotherapy Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors	NCT04169321	Solid Tumor, Un... Lymphoma	Single Arm	18 Years -	Cytosite Biopharma Inc.
Study Using CP-751,871 In Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer That Has Not Responded To Previous Anti-Cancer Treatments	NCT00560560	Colorectal Neop...	CP-751, 871	18 Years -	Pfizer

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for single arm

Every month we try and update this database with for single arm cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for single arm

Every month we try and update this database with for single arm cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them. We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Every month we try and update this database with for single arm cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.