⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ "A total no brainer"

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ "Love this, so easy."

Spots is the easy way to track your skin, mole and cancer changes.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Robot-assisted Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: Robot-assisted Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy

Official Title: Robot-assisted Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Patients With Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer: a Multicenter Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial (RAMIE Trial)

Study ID: NCT03094351

Study Description

Brief Summary: This is the first randomized controlled study to compare the robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) to minimally invasive conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (CTE). The aim of this trial is to evaluate the safety, risks of the robot-assisted esophagectomy, and to compare the short-term operative outcomes and long-term oncological outcomes between the two surgical treatments.

Detailed Description: Objective: This study aims to compare the oncological outcomes between robot-assisted esophagectomy and minimally invasive conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Study design: Randomized controlled parallel-group superiority trial Study population: Patients (age \>= 18 and \<= 75 years) with histologically proven surgically resectable (cT1b-3, N0-2, M0) squamous cell carcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus with European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2. Intervention: 360 patients will be randomly allocated to either A) robot-assisted esophagectomy (n=180) or B) conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (n=180). Patients will receive the following interventions: Group A. robot assisted esophagectomy, with gastric conduit formation. Group B. conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy, with gastric conduit formation. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is 5-year overall survival rate. Secondary outcomes are 5-year disease free survival, 3-year overall survival rate, 3-year disease free survival, (in hospital) mortality within 30 and 60 days, R0 resections, operation related events, postoperative recovery, lymph nodes status, quality of life. Follow-up: 60 months after discharge of the last randomized patient.

Eligibility

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT

Sex: ALL

Healthy Volunteers: No

Locations

General hospital of eastern theater command, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, , China

Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, , China

Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, , China

Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, , China

Contact Details

Name: Zhigang Li, Master

Affiliation: Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Name: Hecheng Li, Master

Affiliation: Ruijin Hospital

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Name: Hezhong Chen, Master

Affiliation: Changhai Hospital, the Second Military Medical University

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Name: Lijie Tan, Master

Affiliation: Fudan University

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Name: Bentong Yu, Master

Affiliation: The First of Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Useful links and downloads for this trial

Clinicaltrials.gov

Google Search Results

Logo

Take Control of Your Skin and Body Changes Today.

Try out Spots for free, set up only takes 2 mins.

spots app storespots app store

Join others from around the world: