The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Panitumumab, Regorafenib, or TAS-102, in Treating Patients With Metastatic and/or Unresectable RAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer
Official Title: PULSE: A Randomized, Phase II Open Label Study of PanitUmumab RechaLlenge Versus Standard Therapy After Progression on Anti-EGFR Therapy in Patients With Metastatic and/or Unresectable RAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer
Study ID: NCT03992456
Brief Summary: This phase II trial studies how well retreatment with panitumumab works compared to standard of care regorafenib or trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102) in treating patients with colorectal cancer that is negative for RAS wild-type colorectal cancer has spread to other places in the body (metastatic), and/or cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable), and is negative for resistance mutations in blood. Treatment with panitumumab may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Some tumors need growth factors to keep growing. Growth factor antagonists, such as regorafenib, may interfere with the growth factor and stop the tumor from growing. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as TAS-102, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving panitumumab may work better in treating patients with colorectal cancer than with the usual treatment of regorafenib or TAS-102.
Detailed Description: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare the overall survival (OS) in molecularly selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving panitumumab rechallenge versus standard therapy (TAS-102 or regorafenib). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the progression free survival (PFS) in molecularly selected patients with metastatic CRC receiving panitumumab rechallenge versus standard therapy (TAS-102 or regorafenib). II. To define the objective response rate (ORR) in patients receiving panitumumab rechallenge versus standard therapy (TAS-102 or regorafenib). III. To define the clinical benefit rate (CBR = complete response + partial response + stable disease \>= 4 months) in patients receiving panitumumab rechallenge versus standard therapy (TAS-102 or regorafenib). IV. To compare the safety and tolerability of panitumumab rechallenge versus standard therapy (TAS-102 or regorafenib). V. To compare quality of life (QOL) between panitumumab rechallenge versus standard therapy (TAS-102 or regorafenib) as measured by the linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) questionnaires. CORRELATIVE RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: I. To assess plasma pharmacodynamics biomarkers of response and resistance to therapy. II. To explore any correlation between tissue and blood based biomarkers and clinical outcomes. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive panitumumab intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for a maximum of 24 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM B: Patients receive trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-5 and 8-12, or regorafenib PO once daily (QD) on days 1-21, at the discretion of the treating physician. Treatment repeats every 28 days for a maximum of 24 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days and then every 3 months for up to 3 years after randomization.
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, United States
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
Aurora Cancer Care-Milwaukee West, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States
Name: John H Strickler
Affiliation: Academic and Community Cancer Research United
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR