Neoplasms

Urinary Tract, Sexual Organs, and Pregnancy Conditions

All Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Genital Neoplasms, Male

Urogenital Neoplasms

Genital Diseases

Genital Diseases, Male

Urogenital Diseases

Prostatic Diseases

Male Urogenital Diseases

Central Nervous System Depressants

All Drugs and Chemicals

Anesthetics

Anesthetics, Local

Both are imaging probe devices that is inserted under local anesthetic, in the rectum using lubricant, positioning against the prostate gland, and attached to the table. This is done at baseline (Day 0) under local anesthetic with the patient in partial dorsal lithotomy position

Transrectal APT Device or Transperineal Device will be used

Patient is given local anesthetic transrectally to the prostate base and the probe is inserted with patient in the lateral decubitus position.

TRUS probe

Peter Chung, MD

This purpose of this study is designed to compare two types of images; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Trans-Rectal Ultrasound (TRUS) to see which one performs more accurately for the image-guided insertion of Fiducial Markers(FMs) within the tumour. Though effective for guiding FM placement at the poles of the prostate gland due to excellent visualization of the prostatic boundaries, TRUS may not be ideally suited for marking the GTV. Conventional TRUS is neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific for accurate visualization of intra-prostatic tumor. A new interventional MRI technique enables needle guidance to the gross tumour Volume (GTV) for FM placement. It is of particular importance that both techniques be evaluated to enable which one is more effective so that it can be implemented in the designs of future trials involving dose-escalation to prostate.

The success of dose escalation strategies in prostate cancer over the last decade has relied on high accuracy in target delineation, localization and radiation delivery. Improved biochemical control with acceptable levels of toxicity (specifically rectal) has been achieved by stringently monitoring the location of the prostate during the course of radiation treatment. Studies in the early 1990's demonstrated that daily bony alignment was a poor surrogate for prostate gland location. Since then, various strategies have been devised to localize the prostate precisely during treatment. Of these, Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS)-guided gold fiducial marker (FM) insertion and x-ray imaging of markers has been a broadly successful approach. TRUS guidance has been used for fiducial marker insertion within the prostate since 1985 in various centers throughout the world and has also been a standard practice in PMH since 1997 in men undergoing radical external beam radiotherapy. A retrospective comparative study of 106 patients evaluating the relative accuracy of endorectal MRI and TRUS in detecting the location of tumor reported an improved performance of endorectal MRI especially in the base and midgland regions. Over the last few years, mounting experience in the interpretation of prostate MRI, and addition of physiologic imaging sequences has further improved the performance of MRI in detecting and localizing the GTV.

Fiducial Localization and Individualized Radiotherapy -Prostate Cancer

Fiducial Localization and Individualized Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer (FLIP)

Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada

University Health Network, Toronto

prostate biopsies obtained with side-firing probe

end-firing and side-firing vary in the angle in which they sample the prostate

Stijn Roemeling, MD, PhD

The purpose of this study is to study the difference in prostate cancer between two prostate biopsy techniques, namely end-firing and side-firing. These differ in the angle at which the prostate is biopsied.

Rationale: Research towards the efficacy of transrectal prostate biopsies has predominantly focused on the amount of biopsy cores. However, variation in the angle of entrance of the biopsy gun has been less studied. It is believed that obtaining biopsy cores by end firing will improve the efficacy, because of an improved sampling of the apical region.

Objectives: To investigate the difference between side and end-firing in transrectal prostate needle biopsies in terms of qualitative and quantitative prostate cancer detection.

Methods: From September 1st 2009 - September 1st 2012, all men with an initial prostate biopsy in a representative, Dutch, general hospital with six participating urologists and two residents will be subjected to a randomized controlled, single blind, single center, diagnostics trial. Men will be randomized for a biopsy using an end-firing or a side-firing probe. The primary endpoint is the prostate cancer detection rate; secondary endpoints are the number of cores invaded with prostate cancer, nomogram for indolent cancer-score, Gleason score, complications and biopsy length.

Expected outcomes: We hypothesize that no differences between the biopsy techniques exist.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization	Link
Fiducial Localization and Individualized Radiotherapy -Prostate Cancer	NCT00789607	Prostate Cancer	Transrectal APT... TRUS probe	18 Years -	University Health Network, Toronto
The BIOPRES Trial: Transrectal BIOpsies of the PRostate: End Versus Side-firing	NCT00851292	Prostate Cancer	TRUS probe	-	Amphia Hospital

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for trus probe

Every month we try and update this database with for trus probe cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for trus probe

Every month we try and update this database with for trus probe cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them. We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.

Every month we try and update this database with for trus probe cancer trials from around the world to help patients and their families find trials that might be right for them.
We offer this 100% free of charge and do not endorse any of the trials listed here, we hope it helps you or a loved one.