Neoplasms

Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

All Conditions

Symptoms and General Pathology

Nervous System Diseases

Rare Diseases

Breast Neoplasms

Back Pain

Low Back Pain

Chronic Pain

Pain

Neurologic Manifestations

Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

Oculocerebral Syndrome With Hypopigmentation

Participants will be given two beverages, (isomaltulose or sucrose) in a random order (one of each on each of the two test dates).

Participants will be given test beverages containing 50gr of isomaltulose (low glycemic index = 32). Isomaltulose powder will be dissolved in 250mL water, and participants will be instructed to consume this beverage within 5 minutes. Blood glucose levels will be collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after consumption of the beverages. The first two drops of blood will be discarded, the third drop will be used for testing.

Low glycemic load

Participants will be given test beverages containing 50gr sucrose (high glycemic index = 65). Sucrose powder will be dissolved in 250mL water, and participants will be instructed to consume this beverage within 5 minutes. Blood glucose levels will be collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after consumption of the beverages. The first two drops of blood will be discarded, the third drop will be used for testing.

High glycemic load

The development of chronic pain is one of the most seen sequelae in the cancer survivor population. Literature reports the presence of pain in approximately 40% of 5-year survivors. Specifically, in breast cancer survivors, chronic pain is estimated to be present in at least 50% of this population. On the other hand, chronic low back pain is one of the leading causes of disability and decrease in quality of life. It has huge economical, psychological and social impacts on individuals, society and health institutions.

Unhealthy dietary behavior is associated with the occurrence, maintenance and management of chronic pain. Also, excessive calorie intake and diets rich in sugar, fat, sodium and caffeine were observed in patients having chronic pain. However, although nutritional factors are suggested as an associated lifestyle factor of chronic pain, limited attention is given to dietary and nutritional factors in relation to chronic pain.

One particular mechanism drawing attention in the link between nutrition and pain are blood glucose levels and the glycemic response. Animal research shows the potential for reduced blood glucose to influence several pathways involved in chronic pain, including decreased oxidative stress, and reduced neuronal excitability. Given the link between blood glucose levels, as well as the evidence for the importance of interpersonal variability in the glycemic response, this glycemic response can also be of interest for chronic pain research. Finding a possible link between both the glycemic response and pain-related outcomes, could give direction to further research focussing on implementing (personalized) nutritional/dietary advise to maintain healthy blood glucose levels in people suffering from chronic pain.

Therefore, this study will provide the first step in this promising line of research, by being the first to look for differences in glycemic response between breast cancer survivors having chronic pain and healthy pain-free controls, and between chronic low back pain patients and healthy pain-free controls.

Secondly, this study will also investigate possible associations between glycemic response, pain-related outcomes, nutrition related outcomes, physical activity, and body composition for breast cancer survivors and chronic low back pain patients separately in comparison with healthy pain-free controls.

Study Design:

This study will be carried out as an experimental, cross-over study, including two pain populations, one control group and two assessment sessions.

At the first session, firstly, all participants will undergo an assessment including pain-related outcomes, nutrition-related outcomes, and measures of physical activity, quality of life, body composition, and fasting blood glucose. Secondly, participants will be given a test beverage (with a high or low glycemic index, randomly decided), after which blood glucose levels will be assessed several times during the next 120 minutes.

At the second session, two days later (washout period), only fasting blood glucose levels will be tested again, after which the study participants will be given the other test beverage, after which blood glucose levels will be monitored once more for 120 minutes. Other outcome measures will not be re-assessed after exposure to the beverages, as we do not expect a direct influence of these test beverages on the outcome variables.

Results will be analysed and published separately for chronic low back pain patients and breast cancer survivors.

Recruitment of participants:

Participants will be recruited via posters and flyers. These posters and flyers will also be distributed to general practitioners, pharmacists, physiotherapists, health insurance companies, etc., who will be asked to alert potential participants to the possibility of study participation. Information and recruitment messages will also be placed on the website and social media platforms of the Pain in Motion research group.

Informed consent:

Prior to participating in the studies, each participant will be asked to read and sign a participant information sheet and a consent form

Pain, Nutrition and Glycemic Response in Chronic Low Back Pain and Breast Cancer Survivors

The Association Between Pain, Nutrition and Glycemic Response in Chronic Low Back Pain and Breast Cancer Survivors: a Cross-over Trial.

The Investigator and the Participating Site shall treat all information and data relating to the Study disclosed to Participating Site and/or Investigator in this Study as confidential and shall not disclose such information to any third parties or use such information for any purpose other than the performance of the Study. The collection, processing and disclosure of personal data, such as patient health and medical information is subject to compliance with applicable personal data protection and the processing of personal data (Directive 95/46/EC and Belgian law of December 8, 1992 on the Protection of the Privacy in relation to the Processing of Personal Data).

Data are anonymous if no one, not even the researcher, can connect the data to the individual who provided it. No identifying information is collected from the individual.

Blood glucose levels will be measured using OneTouch Verio (LifeScan Europe, Johnson \& Johnson, Switzerland). Blood glucose levels will be collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after consumption of the beverages.

The "Brief Pain Inventory" allows to rate the worst pain in the last 24 hours, the least pain in the last 24 hours, the average pain and the pain intensity at the moment of filling out the questionnaire. This tool also assesses the interference of pain with seven daily activities, including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep via an 11-point numeric rating pain scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

The "Central Sensitization Inventory" assesses symptoms that can indicate central sensitization mechanisms. It includes two sections, Part A and Part B, which can be used independently from each other. In this study, only Part A will be used, which includes 25 questions scored on a Likert Scale ranging from 0 (i.e. never) to 4 (i.e. always). Summing these scores, a total score between 0 and 100 is obtained. The CSI showed a cut-off of 40 to indicate the possible presence of central sensitization.

The "Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire" is a screening tool for neuropathic pain. It consists of four main questions, which all include 10 sub-questions. Each of these subquestions can be answered with YES (1 point) or NO (0 points). Scores which are equal or higher to 4 out of 10 indicate the possible presence of neuropathic problems that underly the pain problem.

Electrical detection thresholds will be measured using the Surpass LT stimulator (EMS Biomedical, Korneuburg, Austria) at the bilateral sural nerve, and at the bilateral median nerve (i.e. four test sites). Each stimulus will be a constant current rectangular pulse train consisting of 5 pulses delivered at a frequency of 250 Hertz. Stimulation will start at 0 milli amper and will be gradually increased using steps of 0.5 milli amper until the patient is experiencing a faint sensation.

Electrical pain thresholds will be measured using the Surpass LT stimulator (EMS Biomedical, Korneuburg, Austria) at the bilateral sural nerve, and at the bilateral median nerve (i.e. four test sites). Each stimulus will be a constant current rectangular pulse train consisting of 5 pulses delivered at a frequency of 250 Hertz. Stimulation will start at 0 milli amper and will be gradually increased using steps of 0.5 milli amper until the stimulus is experienced as painful.

Electrical temporal summation will be measured using the Surpass LT stimulator (EMS Biomedical, Korneuburg, Austria). Temporal summation will be assessed by delivering 20 electrical stimuli at the previously determined intensity of the electrical pain threshold. The patient will be asked to give a verbal numeric rating scale score ranging from 0 (= no pain) to 100 (= worst possible pain) at the 1st, the 10th and the 20th stimulus. The outcome measures for temporal summation will be the differences between the 10th and 1st pain score, the 20th and 10th pain score and 20th and 1st pain score.

Electrical offset analgesia will be measured using the Surpass LT stimulator (EMS Biomedical, Korneuburg, Austria). Electrical stimuli will be applied as a train of rectangular pulses delivered by a constant current stimulator. The stimulation intensity will be calculated using the electrical pain threshold. The study participants will be given the painful stimuli into three times intervals and using three intensities; T1 (5 seconds at 150% of Electrical pain threshold), T2 (5 second at 180% of Electrical Pain threshold) and T3 (20 seconds at 150% Electrical pain threshold). Afterwards, participants will undergo a control electrical stimulus which encompasses 30 seconds of constant electrical stimulation at 150% of the Electrical pain threshold. During each application (control trial, T1, T2, and T3) participants need to report their intensity of pain on a visual analogue scale. The scale is anchored by "no pain"(score of 0) and "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100).

Pressure pain thresholds measure hyperalgesia by means of a digital pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich) with a 1 centimetre square tip. Pressure will be increased at a rate of 1 kilogram per second. Subjects need to say "stop" when the pressure is experienced as painful.

The diary asks for dietary intake information of two weekdays and one day in the weekend. Collected data with the 3-day food diary will allow us to find out approximate calorie intake, micronutrient intake, macronutrient intake of each participant.

Collected data with the 3-day food diary will allow us to calculate the Healthy Eating Index. The "Healthy Eating Index" consists of thirteen items of which nine items (total fruit, whole fruit, vegetables, greens and beans, whole grains, dairy, total protein foods, seafood and plant proteins, fatty acids) are recommended to consume, while the consumption of the other four items (refined grains, sodium, added sugars, saturated fats) should be as low as possible in order to achieve a healthy diet. Score for the Healthy Eating Index range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent healthier diets

A nine-point score of the Mediterranean Diet Score can be calculated using gender-specific medians of intake. A value above the median is rated 1, below the median 0. Higher scores represent healthier diets.

"Short Form-36" contains 36 questions across 7 subscales, namely, "general health", "limitations of activities", "physical health problems", "emotional health problems", "social activities", "pain" and "energy and emotions". Each domain ranked between 0 to 100. Higher scores indicates better.

The "International Physical Activity Questionnaire" consists of 5 main domains (1-job-related physical activity; 2-transportation related physical activity; 3-housework, house maintenance, and caring for family-related physical activity; 4-recreation, sports, and leisure-time physical activity; and 5-time spent sitting) with 27 context-specific physical activity questions. Higher scores indicates better.

"TANITA MC-780MA" bio electrical impedance analysis will be used to analyse the body weight in kilograms and body weight percentage.

"TANITA MC-780MA" bio electrical impedance analysis will be used to analyse the body fat mass in kilograms and body fat mass percentage.

"TANITA MC-780MA" bio electrical impedance analysis will be used to analyse the body muscle mass in kilograms and body muscle mass percentage.

"TANITA MC-780MA" bio electrical impedance analysis will be used to analyse the body water in kilograms and body water percentage.

Body height in meters will be measured using a Seca length meter.

Body weight and height will be combined to report body mass index in kilogram per meter squared.

KU Leuven

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Principal Investigator

Wounds and Injuries

Syndrome

Fractures, Bone

Fractures, Compression

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Postoperative Complications

Central Nervous System Depressants

All Drugs and Chemicals

Adjuvants, Anesthesia

Analgesics

Pharmaceutical Solutions

Bupivacaine

Fentanyl

Anesthetics

Anesthetics, Local

Analgesics, Opioid

Narcotics

Anesthetics, Intravenous

Anesthetics, General

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of active solution: intrathecal bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml

6 hour washout followed by

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of inactive placebo solution: preservative-free normal saline

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of inactive placebo solution: preservative-free normal saline

6 hour washout followed by

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of active solution: intrathecal bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml

The patient is infused with solution through the percutaneous intrathecal catheter at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test

Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Intrathecal infusion of normal saline at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Placebo

40-mL IDDS containing a solution of fentanyl 50 mcg/mL with bupivacaine 30 mg/mL

Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS)

Salim Hayek, MD

The purpose of this study will be to determine the efficacy and the prognostic value of a continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test in an in-hospital setting for selecting patients who would have better long term outcomes for treatment with intrathecal implantable devices. The investigators will compare the primary outcomes \[changes in pain intensity score (NRS), patient global impression of change (PGIC)\] before and after intrathecal infusion of an admixture of bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml versus normal saline.

The study will include 36 patients with intractable chronic low back pain in the setting of lumbar post-laminectomy syndrome or vertebral compression fracture who failed conservative management and are considered candidates for IDDS.

Prior to the implant, the patients will undergo an intrathecal prognostic infusion test with an externalized catheter. Baseline NRS pain scores will be assessed and documented on all patients upon admission to the preoperative area. An intrathecal catheter will be placed in the outpatient procedure suite at the appropriate level for target dermatomes. The needle entry point will occur in the upper lumbar spine and catheter tip will be placed in the lower thoracic spine, under local anesthesia with the patient awake and with minimal or no sedation. The intrathecal infusion will be started using an external pump once patient is in the PACU. The research component is to perform the intrathecal test with normal saline (inactive placebo solution) in addition to a test with fentanyl and bupivacaine (active solution). Patients will be randomly assigned to either Group I (continuous infusion of bupivacaine and fentanyl followed by saline) or Group II (continuous infusion of saline followed by bupivacaine and fentanyl).

In PACU, patients will be started on an infusion rate of 0.5 ml/hr and titrated to pain relief greater than 50% of baseline or up to 0.8-1.0 ml/hr within 6-8 hrs after start of the infusion. A clinician blinded to the treatment arm will assess NRS and PGIC on the patients after approximately 12 hours. Assessment will include changes in pain intensity score at rest and upon ambulating or performing maneuvers that normally elicit patient's low back pain. A 4-6-hour washout period will be allotted with infusion of preservative-free normal saline at a rate of 0.2 ml/hr, after which the physician will document a return of the NRS to baseline before switching therapies.

Recruitment: Subjects will be recruited from patients seen at the University Hospitals Pain Medicine clinics by attending physicians. Screening will be done before obtaining consent by an investigator. If patients are deemed appropriate for an intrathecal device they will undergo normal procedures and guidelines in place prior to being considered candidates for an implantable device. No subject will be compensated for participation.

Consent Process: Subjects will be consented by one of the investigators. An explanation in lay terms for the reasons of the study and the proposed prognostic benefits will be used to promote patient understanding. If interested, eligible individuals will be given the opportunity to ask and have all questions addressed before signing the informed consent document. The procedure will occur at their next visit, and continued consent of study participation will be confirmed.

Study Design: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled cross over study comparing prognostic intrathecal testing with an admixture of bupivacaine and fentanyl versus saline. None of the procedures in this study deviate from usual clinical care that patients receive at UHCMC or nationally. Baseline scores using the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain (a scale form 0-10, where 0 signifies no pain at all, and 10 the worst possible pain) will be recorded, both in the sitting or supine position (least pain) and with ambulation or standing (worst pain). Patients will be given weight based cefazolin (or vancomycin if indicated) prior to placing the externalized intrathecal catheter. Placement of the percutaneous intrathecal catheter will be done in the operating room with minimal or no sedation in the prone or lateral decubitus position under fluoroscopic guidance. Needle entry will occur in the mid-upper lumbar spine and through the needle an intrathecal catheter will be advanced until its tip is positioned in the posterior intrathecal space in the lower thoracic spine. The needle is then removed and the catheter is secured in place with steri-strips and a clear sterile bio-occlusive dressing will be placed. Patients will then be transferred to the PACU where they will be initiated on one of two solutions that will be prepared for each patient by the investigational pharmacy staff at UHCMC. The solutions will be labeled as "Intrathecal solution 1" and "Intrathecal solution 2" and will be contained in a sterile 50 ml bag. Solution 1 and 2 may contain either:

1. Preservative-free normal saline
2. Fentanyl 1 mcg/ml and bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml

The content of Intrathecal solution 1 and 2 will be unknown to all investigators and participants in the study with the exception of the investigational pharmacy. The order of the Intrathecal solution (1 or 2) will be determined by pharmacy using a computer generated random sequence allocation. The intrathecal catheter will be attached to a pump delivering solution 1 or 2 at around noon time, in the recovery area on the day the catheter is placed. A bolus of 1cc will be given through the infusion pump at initiation of therapy and the patient will then be started on an infusion rate of 0.5 ml/hr. After 3-4 hours (around 3-4 pm) and similarly around 6-7 pm the rate will be titrated depending on patient's response up to a maximum of 0.8-1.0 ml/hr. If the patient has achieved \> 50% pain relief compared to baseline, no up-titration will occur; i.e. the rate will be increased only if the patient has not had 50% or more reduction in baseline pain on the NRS. The intrathecal rate will be kept the same provided the patient had 50% or greater decrease in pain scores or has reached the 1.0 ml/hr rate (whichever comes first). The rate will be unchanged from 6-7 pm until around 6-7 am the next morning when the infusion will be stopped and the patient will be assessed for pain relief. In the morning, the patient will be asked to rate the pain score at rest (in bed or chair) and with ambulation/standing. The pain scores will be recorded and the catheter will be aspirated at the hub to ensure continued cerebrospinal fluid flow and the patient will be started on a solution of preservative-free normal saline at 0.2 ml/hr to keep the catheter patent. After 6 hours, around noon time, the patient will be crossed over to Intrathecal solution 1 or 2, depending on what she/he had the day before, given 1.0 ml of that solution as a bolus and then infusion will be started at 0.5 ml/hr and the same protocol as the day before will be repeated with the patient discharged the next morning. Patients who experience greater than 50% pain relief (relative to baseline) with either intrathecal solution will be offered the implant of a permanent IDDS that will deliver a combination of bupivacaine and low-dose fentanyl. Patients not responding to both solutions with greater than 50% pain relief will be considered to have failed the intrathecal test and would not proceed to implant. The patients will be asked to pick which solution provided better pain relief: solution 1 or solution 2 and responses will be recorded. Additionally, pain scores obtained periodically as part of patients' usual clinical care vital signs and recorded by the nursing staff on the hospital ward will be collected throughout the study. Un-blinding for patients who had a successful intrathecal prognostic infusion test with greater than 50% pain relief will not occur until 12 months have elapsed since the pump implant.

Outcome measures will include:

1. Baseline prior to commencement of the prognostic infusion test: Pain intensity using the Numerical Rating Scale \[NRS\], patient global impression of change \[PGIC\], Oswestry disability index \[ODI\] and painDETECT.
2. At 14-18 hours: Pain intensity in Numerical Rating Scale \[NRS\], patient global impression of change \[PGIC\], complications and side effects.
3. Prior to second infusion: Pain intensity in Numerical Rating Scale \[NRS\], patient global impression of change \[PGIC\], complications and side effects.
4. At prognostic infusion test completion: Pain intensity in Numerical Rating Scale \[NRS\], patient global impression of change \[PGIC\], complications and side effects, Oswestry disability index \[ODI\] and painDETECT.
5. At 6 and 12 months post-implant for implanted patients Pain intensity in Numerical Rating Scale \[NRS\], patient global impression of change \[PGIC\], Oswestry disability index \[ODI\] and painDETECT.

Study Methodology/Procedures: The study will include 36 patients with intractable chronic low or mid back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome or vertebral fracture who failed conservative management including epidural steroid injection and medical therapy and were referred to our practice for pain management.

Patient will undergo the usual psychological and medical evaluations before the initiation of the prognostic infusion test. Patients who are considered candidates for intrathecal pump implant fulfilling the inclusion/exclusion criteria above and who elect to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to two groups.

Group I tested with continuous infusion of intrathecal bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml for 14-18 hours followed by a trial with normal saline for another 14-18 hours.

Group II tested with intrathecal normal saline for 14-18 hours followed by intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml for another 14-18 hours.

Note that drugs will be delivered by the pharmacy to a blinded physician and labeled as Intrathecal solution 1 and Intrathecal solution 2 to be administered sequentially, separated by a 4-6-hr infusion of preservative-free saline.

Outcomes will be assessed and documented on all patients upon admission to the preoperative area. The patients will be taken then to the procedure room and a standardized intrathecal catheter will be placed under fluoroscopic guidance where the tip of the catheter will be placed at the T7-T11 posterior intrathecal interspace. Patients will be discharged to the PACU where they will be started on a rate of 0.5 ml/hr.

Six to eight hours following initiation of the infusion, all the patients will be titrated to 0.8-1.0 ml/hr, provided less \< 50% improvement in pain scores occurs. A physician who is blinded to the treatment will assess NRS after approximately 12 hrs (around 6-7 am of the following day). A 4-6 hours washout period will ensue with infusion of preservative-free normal saline at a rate of 0.2 ml/hr after which the physician will document a return of the NRS to baseline before switching therapies or record the value at 6 hrs after infusing normal saline and switch then to solution 2. NRS will be reassessed around 6 am the following morning. Additionally, pain scores documented with usual clinical care vital signs will be captured. All reported adverse events will be recorded.

No pain medications will be prescribed during the admission. If such medications are needed, the patient will be excluded from continuing on with the study and will be recorded as a prognostic-infusion-test failure.

The intrathecal catheter will be aspirated for confirmation of free cerebrospinal fluid flow (about 1 ml) between all solution changes and at the end of the prognostic infusion test.

After the completion of the prognostic infusion test, the catheter will be removed and patients will be discharged home.

Only patients who report \>50% reduction from baseline NRS while receiving either intrathecal solution will be considered for intrathecal drug delivery system implant. It is conceivable that some patients may get \>50% reduction in pain scores with both the active solution and saline or have better outcome with the saline solution. The patients will be asked to answer a binary question rating preference to solution 1 vs. solution 2. Patients with pain relief greater than 50% will be implanted with an IDDS and will receive an intrathecal solution of fentanyl and bupivacaine. All subjects with \>50% pain relief with either or both intrathecal solutions will be implanted. Even if the patient gets \>50% pain relief only from the saline solution, or the patient chooses the saline solution over the active solution (when asked if #1 vs. #2 was better relief) each patient will receive active drug after being implanted. All patients will be compared in long-term outcome (secondary outcome measures) at 6 months and 12 months versus the response to the prognostic test solutions.

Unblinding of solution 1 and 2 will not occur until 12 months have elapsed since pump implant. The six and twelve month visits will be coordinated with a pump refill visit.

Data Collection: Randomization will be performed, and baseline data will collect on admission to the preoperative area. A physician or physician assistant will obtain all data.

Baseline data collected will include name, last 4 digits of social security number, age, sex, race, duration of pain, treatment group, average 0-10 low back numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores over the past week and analgesic medication consumption.

The primary outcome variable will be the change in pain intensity score \[NRS\] 0-10 numerical rating scale back pain score at the end of the intrathecal prognostic infusion testing period around 6am between Intrathecal solution 1 and Intrathecal solution 2.

Secondary outcome variables will be Oswestry disability score, changes in painDETECT, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and side effects (medications) and complications (injections). These variables will be recorded at baseline, at the completion of each phase of the prognostic infusion test, and at 6 and 12 months post-implant.

Patients who are considered candidates for intrathecal pump implant fulfilling the inclusion/exclusion criteria and who elect to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to two groups:

Group A tested with continuous infusion of intrathecal bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml for 14-18 hours followed by a trial with normal saline for another 14-18 hours; separated by a 4-6-hr infusion of preservative-free saline.

Group B tested with intrathecal normal saline for 14-18 hours followed by intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml for another 14-18 hours; separated by a 4-6-hr infusion of preservative-free saline.

The drugs will be delivered by the pharmacy to a blinded physician and labeled as Intrathecal solution 1 and Intrathecal solution 2 to be administered sequentially, separated by a 4-6-hr infusion of preservative-free saline. The content of Intrathecal solution 1 and 2 will be unknown to all investigators and participants in the study with the exception of the investigational pharmacy. The order of the Intrathecal solution (1 or 2) will be determined by pharmacy using a computer generated random sequence allocation.

Determining the Prognostic Value of Continuous Intrathecal Infusion

A Randomized Double Blind Cross-over Trial of Continuous Intrathecal Infusion for Assessing Patients With Chronic Non-cancer Pain Who Would Benefit From Treatment With Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS) Implant

Numerical Rating Scale is an 11-point pain scale whereby 0 signifies no pain and 10 the worse pain ever

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) This scale based on a questionnaire of activities measures the impact of pain on multiple factors within a patient's daily life. Higher values represent worse outcomes, or a higher impact from pain on the patient's daily life. The total score range is 0-50. Subcategories include: 0-4: no disability. 5-14: mild disability. 15-24: moderate disability. 25-34: sever disability. 35-50: completely disabled.

The painDETECT questionnaire was specifically developed to detect neuropathic pain components in adult patients with low back pain. PainDETECT is a scale of 0 to 35, with 0 being no disability to 35 being max disability.

The painDETECT questionnaire was specifically developed to detect neuropathic pain components in adult patients with low back pain. PainDETECT is a scale 0 to 38, with 0 being no disability to 38 being max disability.

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale is a seven-point single-item scale ranging from 7 'very much worse' to 1 'very much improved'.

TSQ is a questionnaire to rate level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the Intrathecal Drug Delivery- patients were asked preference for either intrathecal solution. Patient preferences for each solution were measured. This data represents the total number of patient's that received a trial and the total number of patients who preferred each solution. Higher values indicate a greater number of study participants preferred a specific arm. Patients with no preference are listed separately.

AE is any untoward medical occurrence in the patient which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this infusion treatment

Number of participants that had increases or decreases in the dose or frequency of pain medication

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Professor, Department of Anesthesiology/Chief, Division of Pain Medicine

Deaths and Adverse Events were not collected per intervention. All participants participated in all interventions. All participants were combined into one group for the adverse event tracking.

All Study Participants

All participants participated in all interventions so for the baseline characteristics all participants were combined into one arm/group.

Age, Continuous

Sex: Female, Male

Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)

Race (NIH/OMB)

Dr. Salim Hayek

Baseline

End of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 2)

End of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 3)

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of active solution: intrathecal bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml

6 hour washout followed by

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of inactive placebo solution: preservative-free normal saline

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test: The patient is infused with solution through the percutaneous intrathecal catheter at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Bupivacaine: Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Fentanyl: Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Placebo: Intrathecal infusion of normal saline at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS): 40-mL IDDS containing a solution of fentanyl 50 mcg/mL with bupivacaine 30 mg/mL

Active Solution Followed by Inactive Placebo Solution

First Intervention: Continuous infusion of placebo solution: normal saline at a rate of 0.5-1.0mL/hr for another 14-18 hour.

Washout: 4-6 hr washout infusion of preservative-free saline0.2 mL/hr. Second Intervention: Continuous infusion of active solution: intrathecal bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml at a rate of 0.5-1.0 mL/hr for 14-18 hours.

Inactive Placebo Solution Followed by Active Solution

Change in Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (NRS) With Activity

Change in Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (NRS) at Rest

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of inactive placebo solution: preservative-free normal saline

6 hour washout followed by

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of active solution: intrathecal bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test: The patient is infused with solution through the percutaneous intrathecal catheter at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Bupivacaine: Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Fentanyl: Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Placebo: Intrathecal infusion of normal saline at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours

Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS): 40-mL IDDS containing a solution of fentanyl 50 mcg/mL with bupivacaine 30 mg/mL

Change in Oswestry Disability Score (ODI)

Change in painDETECT Total

Change in painDETECT Final

Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Intrathecal Infusion 1- Sequence 1

Intrathecal Infusion 2- Sequence 1

No preference- Sequence1

Intrathecal Infusion 1- Sequence 2

Intrathecal Infusion 2- Sequence 2

No preference- Sequence 2

Intrathecal infusion 1 is the first infusion subjects received in the study. It corresponds to the active agents in Sequence 1 and saline in sequence 2.

Intrathecal infusion 2 is the second infusion subjects received in the study. It corresponds to saline in Sequence 1 and to the active agents in sequence 2.

All participants were analyzed together for this outcome.

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)

Deaths and Adverse Events were not collected per intervention

Adverse Event (AE)

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of active solution: intrathecal bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml 6 hour washout followed by Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of inactive placebo solution: preservative-free normal saline Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test: The patient is infused with solution through the percutaneous intrathecal catheter at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours Bupivacaine: Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours Fentanyl: Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours Placebo: Intrathecal infusion of normal saline at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS): 40-mL IDDS containing a solution of fentanyl 50 mcg/mL with bupivacaine 30 mg/mL

Active Solution Followed by Inactive Place Solution

Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of inactive placebo solution: preservative-free normal saline 6 hour washout followed by Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test of active solution: intrathecal bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test: The patient is infused with solution through the percutaneous intrathecal catheter at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours Bupivacaine: Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours Fentanyl: Bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours Placebo: Intrathecal infusion of normal saline at a rate of 0.5-1.0 ml/hr for approximately 14-18 hours Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS): 40-mL IDDS containing a solution of fentanyl 50 mcg/mL with bupivacaine 30 mg/mL

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Pain, Nutrition and Glycemic Response in Chronic Low Back Pain and Breast Cancer Survivors	NCT04459104	Chronic Pain	Low glycemic lo... High glycemic l...	18 Years - 65 Years	Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Determining the Prognostic Value of Continuous Intrathecal Infusion	NCT03523000	Lumbar Post-Lam... Chronic Low Bac... Vertebral Compr... Failed Back Sur...	Continuous intr... Bupivacaine Fentanyl Placebo Intrathecal Dru...	30 Years -	University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Pain, Nutrition and Glycemic Response in Chronic Low Back Pain and Breast Cancer Survivors	NCT04459104	Chronic Pain	Low glycemic lo... High glycemic l...	18 Years - 65 Years	Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Pain, Nutrition and Glycemic Response in Chronic Low Back Pain and Breast Cancer Survivors	NCT04459104	Chronic Pain	Low glycemic lo... High glycemic l...	18 Years - 65 Years	Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for chronic low back pain