Neoplasms

Digestive System Diseases

All Conditions

Rectal Neoplasms

Colorectal Neoplasms

Intestinal Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Digestive System Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Intestinal Diseases

Rectal Diseases

Herbal and Botanical

All Drugs and Chemicals

Cola

Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) is the gold standard surgical treatment of rectal cancer. According to the technique first described by Bill Heald, TME entails the resection of the rectum including the whole mesorectal fat and an intact mesorectal fascia. Open TME is accomplished through a midline xifo-umbilical laparotomy and requires a complete mobilization of the left colon and central ligature of inferior mesenteric artery and vein.

Laparoscopic TME mirrors the procedure performed through laparotomy with the same operative steps and performing rectal resection including the excision of the surrounding mesorectal fat and fascia.

Robotic TME mirrors the procedure described by Bill Heald for open surgery but the operation is performed by the master-slave DaVinci System under 3D laparoscopic guidance. The rectal resection is performed including mesorectal fat and fascia.

TaTME has first described by Antonio Lacy in 2012. This procedure has two steps: abdominal and perineal. The abdominal step is performed through a laparoscopic approach as described for laparoscopic TME but the caudal dissection is stopped right below the level of the peritoneal rectal reflection (Douglas pouch). The perineal step is accomplished transanally inserting a specially designed platform into the anal canal and performing the total mesorectal excision under endoscopic guidance.

Marco Maria Lirici, MD

TME is the gold standard surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Specimen quality, integrity of mesorectal fascia and lymph nodes harvest are expression of radicality and good surgery. The LOTARTME study is designed to assess which of the open, laparoscopic, robotic and endoscopic transanal approach is superior. Primary outcome is the evaluation of completeness of mesorectal fascia according to Quirke classification. Secondary outcomes are lymph nodes harvest, local recurrences, overall survivals, cancer related survivals. Inclusion criteria: any patient of any age and sex undergoing to intent-to-treat surgery operated by experienced surgeon. Exclusion criteria: patients with rectal cancer undergoing palliative surgery or multivisceral resection; all patients operated by less experienced surgeons. Study period January 1, 2017 - June 30 2021 and patients enrollment: January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2020. Data collection and analysis: data are collected in a prospective database and statical analysis is carried out using AnalystSoft StatPlus for Windows Software.

Developed in 1992 by Heald Total Mesorectal Excision improved the long-term results of rectal cancer treatment with overall survivals increasing up to 80% and local recurrences decreasing down to 4%. Notwithstanding the introduction of laparoscopy and robotic technology and their application in the field of rectal cancer surgery in the last decades, no further improvement of rectal cancer survivals have been reported. Actually, completeness of mesorectal fat and fascia excision seems not to be improved with these new approaches, compared to standard open surgery. It has been proved that local recurrences are strictly related to the quality of TME and are significantly higher when mesorectal fascia is incomplete according to Quirke classification. In 2012 A. Lacy first reported the transanal approach to TME, developed to overcome the high challenges represented by low rectal dissection when difficult anatomy is present (i.e. obese pts, narrow pelvis, bulging tumors) that may impair the quality of surgical specimen and, therefore, increase the incidence of local recurrences and, indirectly, overall cancer related survivals. There is an ongoing clinical trial (COLOR III) that has been designed to assess whether long term results after TaTME are similar, better or worse than those of open or laparoscopic TME. Until then scientists and researchers may evaluate the effectiveness of TaTME compared to other surgical approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic) assessing the quality of surgical specimens (i.e. completeness of mesorectal excision and integrity of mesorectal fascia according to Quirke classification). Investigators have designed a prospective observational cohort study assessing the quality of specimen and mesorectal fascia in all patients undergoing TME through an open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal (TaTME) approach between January 2017 and December 2020. All patients have been followed-up with a required minimum follow-up of 6 months. Therefore, the study was terminated on June 2021. Inclusion criteria were: any patient of any age and sex undergoing intent-to-treat surgery operated by experienced surgeon (with ≥ 100 TME performed). Exclusion criteria: patients with rectal cancer undergoing palliative surgery or multivisceral resection, all patients operated by less experienced surgeons (\< 100 TME performed).

Objective of the study:

Assessing the quality of the specimen after TME carried out through laparoscopic, open, robotic and endoscopic transanal approach; evaluating whether TaTME might be superior the other approaches in term of radicality of surgery and local recurrencies.

Primary outcome:

Quirke classification of mesorectal fat and fascia completeness. Three grade classification: complete, nearly complete, incomplete.

Secondary outcomes Lymph node harvest Local recurrences Overall survivals Cancer specific survivals Pathology assessment

A fresh specimen or in vacuum packing is sent for macroscopic assessment to the pathologist. The specimen is dealt as follows:

1) assessment of mesorectum quality; 2) ink painting of specimen non-peritonealized bare areas 3) the specimen is opened along the anterior aspect from the top and the bottom, leaving the bowel intact at a level just above and just below the tumour; 4) placement of formalin-soaked gauze wicks into the unopened ends of the bowel; 5) the specimen is fixed in 10% buffered formalin for at least 48 hours.

The fixed specimen is dealt as follows:

1) 3-5 mm intervals slices through the unopened rectum; 2) slices inspection to note: extent of tumour and the closest distance of tumour to the Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM); positive nodes and the distance of any positive node to the CRM; anterior, posterior or lateral closest distance of tumour to CRM; 3) lymph nodes detection within the fat away from the tumour

Block selection according to the followings:

1) tumor blocks showing closest CRM; 2) tumor blocks showing luminal aspect, 3) all lymph nodes; 4) any polyps; 5) proximal and distal resection margins (distal margin includes both mucosa and mesorectum).

The pathologist examined the specimen in a blinded fashion (unaware of the name of the operating surgeon and the technique performed).

Data are collected in a prospective database. Statistical analysis is carried out with AnalystSoft StatPlus for Windows Software. Chi-square test and chi-square test with Yates correction are used considering p-value significative at p\<.05.

Pathology Assessment of Mesorectal Fascia After TME by Laparoscopic, Open, TransAnal and Robotic Approaches (LOTARTME)

Pathology Assessment of Mesorectal Fascia and Specimen Quality After TME by Laparoscopic, Open, TransAnal and Robotic Approaches (LOTARTME)

Specimen quality i.e. integrity of mesorectal fascia and clearance of radial margins are an important factor with impact on local recurrency of rectal cancer. the 3-grade Quirke classification is used to assess completeness of mesorectal fascia: complete, nearly complete and incomplete

The number of lymph nodes harvested may influence patient's prognosis and survival. A minimum number of nodes is required to assess the cancer stage correctly: stage 2 rectal cancer with a less than 12 node harvest has a behaviour of a stage 3 rectal cancer in the medium and long term follow up.

Local recurrence rate is intended the incidence of pelvic tumor recurrence, especially localized in the presacral area, and anastomotic recurrence

short and medium term survivals (Kaplan-Meier estimate)

Cancer-specific survival (CSS) is defined as the duration from the date of diagnosis until death due to rectal cancer other than other causes

San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital

Professor of Surgery

Patients with T3 rectal cancer who underwent curative surgery.

patients must underwent total mesorectal excision

total mesorectal excision

This study investigates whether risk criteria based on MRI features could identify a cohort of patients with a good prognosis among those recommended for preoperative treatment by NCCN guidelines to avoid preoperative treatment with the likely good survival outcomes by primary surgery and more accurately indicate the response to the treatment and predict prognosis after neoadjuvant treatmen than radiographic TNM staging in the patients who received neoadjuvant therapy.

There is a lack of international consensus on the choice of preoperative treatment for patients with rectal cancer. Existing guidelines decide whether to administer preoperative therapy to patients with rectal cancer mainly based on the TNM system developed by AJCC/UICC, however, radiographic TNM staging is unsatisfactory in predicting the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer, due to inflammatory and fibrotic responses TNM re-staging is less accurate than pre-treatment. Studies have shown that high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) accurately predicted pathologic findings such as CRM involvement, EMVI and TD and patients with MRI-detected CRM involvement, EMVI and TD are at risk for local and distant recurrence as well as poor overall survival. This retrospective study is designed to was to evaluate whether risk criteria based on MRI features can be used as a basis for neoadjuvant treatment decisions and more accurately indicate the response to the treatment and predict prognosis after neoadjuvant treatment than radiographic TNM staging. Patients with MRI-detected circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement, extramural venous invasion (EMVI), or tumor deposits (TD) were defined as MRI high-risk.

MRI Features in Neoadjuvant Treatment Decisions for Patients With Rectal Cancer

Risk Criteria Based on MRI Features Outperform Radiographic TNM Staging in Neoadjuvant Treatment Decisions for Patients With Rectal Cancer:A Single-Center, Open-Label, Retrospective, Observational Cohort Study

Anonymous data may be provided upon reasonable request

Defined as an intrapelvic recurrence following a primary rectal cancer resection, with or without distal metastasis.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Pathology Assessment of Mesorectal Fascia After TME by Laparoscopic, Open, TransAnal and Robotic Approaches (LOTARTME)	NCT04949672	Rectal Cancer Surgery		-	San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital
MRI Features in Neoadjuvant Treatment Decisions for Patients With Rectal Cancer	NCT05609149	Rectal Cancer	total mesorecta...	18 Years - 80 Years	Sun Yat-sen University
Pathology Assessment of Mesorectal Fascia After TME by Laparoscopic, Open, TransAnal and Robotic Approaches (LOTARTME)	NCT04949672	Rectal Cancer Surgery		-	San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for mesorectal fascia