Neoplasms

All Conditions

Blood and Lymph Conditions

Mouth and Tooth Diseases

Respiratory Tract (Lung and Bronchial) Diseases

Ear, Nose, and Throat Diseases

Rare Diseases

Carcinoma

Head and Neck Neoplasms

Lymphedema

Mouth Neoplasms

Laryngeal Neoplasms

Oropharyngeal Neoplasms

Lip Neoplasms

Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms

Laryngeal Diseases

Respiratory Tract Diseases

Respiratory Tract Neoplasms

Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases

Mouth Diseases

Stomatognathic Diseases

Pharyngeal Neoplasms

Pharyngeal Diseases

Oral Cancer

Laryngeal Cancer

Hypopharyngeal Cancer

Lip and Oral Cavity Cancer

Antineoplastic Agents

All Drugs and Chemicals

Capecitabine

Antimetabolites

Patients undergo 32 minute treatments twice daily for 12 weeks using the FlexiTouch Plus System and treatment with a lymphedema therapist weekly on weeks 2-11. Patients undergo nasolaryngoscopy and videofluoroscopic swallow study at baseline.

Patients undergo standard of care self-manual lymphatic drainage (technique instructions provided) twice daily for 12 weeks and treatment with a lymphedema therapist weekly on weeks 2-11. Patients undergo nasolaryngoscopy and videofluoroscopic swallow study at baseline.

Best Practice

Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

Diagnostic Imaging

Undergo skilled lymphedema treatment by a therapist

Lymphedema Management

Modified Barium Swallow

Nasopharyngeal Laryngoscopy

Undergo compression therapy - Flexitouch Plus System is an advanced pneumatic compression device (APCD) that consists of a 2-piece garment that provides systematic and sequential pressure changes to move fluid to intact lymphatic chains.

Pneumatic Compression Therapy

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Questionnaire Administration

Voice Handicap Index-10

Lisa Crujido

This clinical trial tests whether adding the use of a pneumatic compression system with manual lymphatic drainage versus manual lymphatic drainage alone in treating patients with lymphedema after chemoradiation for stage II-IV head and neck cancer. Lymphedema can be the result of surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy or any combination of these procedures. Internal lymphedema has been shown to negatively affect speech production, swallowing, respiration, and voice. Flexitouch is an advanced pneumatic compression device (APCD) that consists of a 2-piece garment that provides pressure changes to move lymph fluid from the impaired area toward healthy regions of the body. Complete decongestive therapy (CDT) is standard of care for treating external lymphedema and involves manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) performed by licensed therapists followed by compression therapy. CDT has long been used for treating lymphedema of the limbs. Combining a pneumatic compression system with standard of care manual lymphatic drainage may have positive effects on speech, voice, and swallowing.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Compare success rates in reducing internal and external lymphedema using manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) versus use of a pneumatic compression device (PCD). Assess efficacy of PCD and MLD.

II. Assess compliance of treatment in both groups. III. Assess changes in voice and swallowing in both groups.

OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Patients undergo 32 minute treatments twice daily for 12 weeks using the FlexiTouch Plus System and treatment with a lymphedema therapist weekly on weeks 2-11. Patients undergo nasolaryngoscopy and videofluoroscopic swallow study at baseline.

GROUP II: Patients undergo standard of care self-manual lymphatic drainage (technique instructions provided) twice daily for 12 weeks and treatment with a lymphedema therapist weekly on weeks 2-11. Patients undergo nasolaryngoscopy and videofluoroscopic swallow study at baseline.

A Pneumatic Compression Device for the Treatment of Lymphedema in Patients With Stage II-IV Head and Neck Cancer After Chemoradiation

Effects of a Pneumatic Compression Device in Post-Chemoradiation Head and Neck Cancer Population

Will be completed at baseline and at the conclusion of the study to assess and compare the effects of traditional manual lymphatic drainage to those from use of a pneumatic compression system.

A reduction in one grade on the Mayo Clinic Lymphedema - head and neck (HN) Grading Scale (MCLGS) or one stage on the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) grading system for lymphedema of the head and neck.

Measured by QOL questionnaire and Facial and Neck Composite Measurements

Status Scale:

PSS-HN

Measured by Voice Handicap Index: VHI-10 and Consensus Aud- Perceptual Eval of Voice: CAPE-V

Measured by Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study, Functional Oral Intake Scale: FOIS, Eating Assessment Tool: EAT-10 and Performance

Mayo Clinic

Nervous System Diseases

Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

Neuromuscular Diseases

Taxane

Patients undergo cryocompression (cooling plus moderate and low pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.

Patients undergo continuous compression (moderate, steady pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.

Patients undergo low cyclic compression (low pressure that comes and goes to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.

Undergo collection of blood, plasma, and serum

Biospecimen Collection

Cryocompression Therapy

Justine Trevino

Mariah Norman

Melissa K Accordino, MD

Melissa K Accordino

This phase III trial compares the effect of 3 study approaches in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: 1) cryocompression, 2) continuous compression, and 3) low cyclic compression. Taxane chemotherapy drugs, such as paclitaxel or docetaxel, can cause a nerve disorder called peripheral neuropathy, which can cause numbness, tingling, or pain in the arms and legs. The 3 study approaches will use a device, called the Paxman Limb Cryocompression System, made of wraps that cool and/or compress the arms and legs. This study may help researchers determine if any of the study approaches are able to prevent taxane chemotherapy from causing peripheral neuropathy.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) at 12 weeks, in participants treated with taxane-based chemotherapy randomized to cryocompression therapy versus continuous compression therapy versus low cyclic compression therapy.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare trajectories over time (6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks) by intervention study arm in clinically meaningful CIPN.

II. To compare mean European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (EORTC-CIPN-20) sensory neuropathy subscale scores at 12 weeks by intervention study arm.

III. To compare differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in changes from baseline in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuropen, tuning fork, Timed Get Up and Go test).

IV. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at 12 weeks in a sensitivity analysis with dropouts treated as failures.

V. To compare rates of adverse events related to study device at 12 weeks (including cold intolerance, skin changes, other adverse events \[AEs\] as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\]) between the three interventions.

ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN separately at weeks 6, 24, and 52.

II. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at week 12 with additional covariate adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI).

III. To compare differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in mean EORTC CIPN-20 motor subscale score and autonomic subscale score, and in mean individual Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 domain (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity) scores.

IV. To compare trajectories over time (6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks) by intervention study arm in mean EORTC CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score, motor subscale score, and autonomic subscale score; and in mean PROMIS-29 individual domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity) scores; and in changes in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuropen, tuning fork, Timed Get Up and Go test).

V. To evaluate the differences by intervention study arm in proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at 12 weeks by chemotherapy regimen.

VI. To assess the effect of the intervention in reducing CIPN occurring in the upper extremities and, separately, in the lower extremities.

VII. To explore the relationship between duration of intervention received at the prescribed level and outcome, analogous to a dose-delivered analysis in a treatment trial.

VIII. To compare rates by study arm of CTCAE Grade 2 or higher sensory and motor neuropathy at 12 weeks.

IX. To evaluate tolerability of cryocompression compared to continuous compression therapy and low cyclic compression therapy, as assessed by rate of temperature and/or pressure adjustments, interruptions, and early discontinuation of the device.

X. To determine participant satisfaction of cryocompression compared to continuous compression therapy and low cyclic compression therapy, assessed by patient questionnaire.

XI. To compare taxane dose-reductions, treatment delays/discontinuation due to CIPN, and relative taxane dose intensity and total taxane dose received, between intervention study arms.

XII. To evaluate differences of intervention effect by sex, race, and ethnicity.

XIII. To confirm pretreatment biomarkers of CIPN risk (vitamin D) and on-treatment biomarker changes indicative of CIPN severity (Neurofilament light chain, NFL) as well as additional biomarkers of interest generated in S1714 for validation.

BANKING OBJECTIVE:

I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms.

ARM 1: Patients undergo cryocompression (cooling plus moderate and low pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.

ARM 2: Patients undergo continuous compression (moderate, steady pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.

ARM 3: Patients undergo low cyclic compression (low pressure that comes and goes to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.

Comparing Cooling and/or Compression Approaches of Limbs for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Ice Compress: Randomized Trial of Limb Cryocompression Versus Continuous Compression Versus Low Cyclic Compression for the Prevention of Taxane-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Defined as an absolute increase of 8 or more points over baseline in the CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score. Analysis will be conducted multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for the baseline score and the stratification factor as covariates.

Will assess by study arm. Will examine the CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score as a continuous variable on the 0-100 scale. The differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in changes from baseline in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuorpen, tuning fork, Get Up and Go test) will also be compared. Multiple linear regression analysis will be conducted, adjusting for the baseline score and the stratification factor as covariates.

Any dropouts prior to the week 12 assessment as failures. Since death is anticipated to be unrelated to the intervention assignment, deaths will be censored. Failures will be analyzed with an aggregate failure variable defined as: experience of neuropathy according to the CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score or dropout prior to week 12 (yes vs. no). Logistic regression will be used, adjusted for the stratification factor as a covariate.

Trajectories over time by intervention study arm in clinically meaningful CIPN will be compared. Generalized estimating equations with a logit link and robust standard errors will be used, adjusting for the baseline score and the stratification factor as covariates.

Rates of adverse events related to study device (including cold intolerance, skin changes, other AEs as assessed by (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[NCI-CTCAE\]) between the three interventions will be compared.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
A Pneumatic Compression Device for the Treatment of Lymphedema in Patients With Stage II-IV Head and Neck Cancer After Chemoradiation	NCT05512767	Clinical Stage ... Clinical Stage ... Clinical Stage ... Head and Neck C... Stage II Hypoph... Stage II Laryng... Stage II Lip an... Stage II Oropha... Stage III Hypop... Stage III Laryn... Stage III Lip a... Stage III Oroph... Stage IV Hypoph... Stage IV Laryng... Stage IV Lip an... Stage IV Oropha...	Best Practice Consensus Audit... Diagnostic Imag... Lymphedema Mana... Modified Barium... Nasopharyngeal ... Pneumatic Compr... Quality-of-Life... Questionnaire A... Voice Handicap ...	18 Years -	Mayo Clinic
A Pneumatic Compression Device for the Treatment of Lymphedema in Patients With Stage II-IV Head and Neck Cancer After Chemoradiation	NCT05512767	Clinical Stage ... Clinical Stage ... Clinical Stage ... Head and Neck C... Stage II Hypoph... Stage II Laryng... Stage II Lip an... Stage II Oropha... Stage III Hypop... Stage III Laryn... Stage III Lip a... Stage III Oroph... Stage IV Hypoph... Stage IV Laryng... Stage IV Lip an... Stage IV Oropha...	Best Practice Consensus Audit... Diagnostic Imag... Lymphedema Mana... Modified Barium... Nasopharyngeal ... Pneumatic Compr... Quality-of-Life... Questionnaire A... Voice Handicap ...	18 Years -	Mayo Clinic
Comparing Cooling and/or Compression Approaches of Limbs for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy	NCT05642611	Malignant Solid...	Biospecimen Col... Cryocompression... Pneumatic Compr... Pneumatic Compr... Quality-of-Life... Questionnaire A...	18 Years -	SWOG Cancer Research Network
A Pneumatic Compression Device for the Treatment of Lymphedema in Patients With Stage II-IV Head and Neck Cancer After Chemoradiation	NCT05512767	Clinical Stage ... Clinical Stage ... Clinical Stage ... Head and Neck C... Stage II Hypoph... Stage II Laryng... Stage II Lip an... Stage II Oropha... Stage III Hypop... Stage III Laryn... Stage III Lip a... Stage III Oroph... Stage IV Hypoph... Stage IV Laryng... Stage IV Lip an... Stage IV Oropha...	Best Practice Consensus Audit... Diagnostic Imag... Lymphedema Mana... Modified Barium... Nasopharyngeal ... Pneumatic Compr... Quality-of-Life... Questionnaire A... Voice Handicap ...	18 Years -	Mayo Clinic

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for pneumatic compression therapy