Symptoms and General Pathology

All Conditions

Digestive System Diseases

Neoplasms

Syndrome

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

Rectal Neoplasms

Colorectal Neoplasms

Intestinal Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Digestive System Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Intestinal Diseases

Rectal Diseases

Patients undergoing open low anterior resection

Patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection

Patients undergoing robotic low anterior resection

Patients undergoing transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME)

Open approach for Total Mesorectal Excision

Open Total Mesorectal Excision

Laparoscopic approach for Total Mesorectal Excision

Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision

Robotic approach for Total Mesorectal Excision

Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision

Transanal approach for Total Mesorectal Excision

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision

Patricia Tejedor

Carlos Pastor

The surgical management of rectal cancer includes a Total Mesorectal Excison (TME); depending on the height of the tumor, the problem of preservation of the anal sphincter arises, being able to perform a low anterior resection, an ultra-low anterior resection (RAUB) or an intersphincteric dissection. In some cases invading the sphincters or the puborectalis muscle, an abdominoperineal resection needs to be performed, being the gold standard in this particular situation so far.

TME can be performed by open, laparoscopic, robotic or transanal approaches, as long as the oncological principles for the resection are achieved. Unfortunately, up to 90% of these patients will present a change in bowel habit, ranging from an increased frequency of bowel movements to the degree of fecal incontinence or evacuation dysfunction. Of these patients, 25-50% will have a severe alteration in the quality of life. This wide spectrum of symptoms has been called "low anterior resection syndrome" (LARS). Other collateral damage is the change in sexual and urinary function, due to hypogastric plexus injury. There is a significant lack of multicenter prospective studies that provide evidence, and that reveal the functional results and quality of life of these techniques available to date for the management of rectal cancer.

The study is set up as a prospective multicentre observational study. Inclusion criteria are: 1) patients over 18 years old, 2) diagnosed with rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection, defined by preoperative MRI, 3) undergoing Open, laparoscopic, robotic or Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) approaches, 4) with/without derivative stoma and 5) with/without neoadjuvant treatment. Exclusion criteria are: 1) Upper rectal cancer, located above the peritoneal reflection, 2) previous radical prostatectomy, 3) previous pelvic radiotherapy, 4) rectal resection without primary anastomosis, 5) intraoperative findings of peritoneal carcinomatosis, 6) stage IV disease, 7) multivisceral or en-bloc resection, which includes uterus, prostate, vagina or bladder, 8) rectal resection due to a benign condition, 9) rectal resection due to a recurrence of rectal cancer (previous anterior resection or another primary neoplasm), 10) rectal resection following a 'watch \& wait' program, 11) emergency surgery, 12) previous derivative colostomy 13) inflammatory bowel disease.

Accepting an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2 in a two-sided test, 45 subjects are necessary in first group and 45 in the second to recognize as statistically significant a difference greater than or equal to 2 units. The common standard deviation is assumed to be 3. It has been anticipated a drop-out rate of 20% Primary outcomes are LARS and Vaizey score. Secondary outcomes included are QLQ C30 and CR29, sexual function questionnaire (female/male), urinary function questionnaire and postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) Data will be collected in an online secure and protected repository (Castor edc). The planned study period is 2 years (September 2021 - September 2023).

It is essential to have a validated instrument that allows us to assess sphincter function and the different aspects of quality of life in operated patients, since increased survival in this pathology has led to greater importance in the evaluation functional outcome and quality of life; Furthermore, there are recent studies that speak of the direct relationship between these factors.

Patient Reported Outcomes Following Cancer of the Rectum

LARS score from 0-42 where 0 means better outcomes

Incontinence score from 0-28 where 0 means better outcomes

Quality of life questionnaire, colorectal cancer related

University of Navarrra Hospital (Clinica Universitaria)

Hospital de Leon

Hospital del Río Hortega

University Hospital Gregorio Marañón

Principal Investigator

Herbal and Botanical

All Drugs and Chemicals

Cola

For transanal total mesorectal excision, a two team approach will be adopted. One surgical team will be performing the abdominal phase dissection using standard laparoscopic approach, while the other will be simultaneously performing the transanal dissection and total mesorectal excision in a 'down-to-up' fashion using laparoscopic instruments.

For robotic total mesorectal excision, a fully robotic approach will be adopted. Left-sided colonic mobilization, division of lymphovascular pedicle, and 'top-to-down' total mesorectal excision will be performed using the robotic platform.

Simon SM Ng, MD

Tony WC Mak, MD

Background: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer is technically challenging because of the confined space within the pelvis. The robotic surgical system is recently introduced to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy in terms of visualization and maneuverability, but robotic surgery is expensive. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is an emerging surgical approach that allows dissection of the most difficult part of the TME plane deep down in the pelvis using a less costly transanal platform. To date, no randomized controlled trial can be found in the literature comparing TaTME and robotic TME.

Objectives: To compare the pathologic outcomes, functional outcomes, and costs between TaTME and robotic TME for mid or low rectal cancer.

Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled, superiority trial.

Subjects: One hundred and eight consecutive patients who are clinically diagnosed with cT1-3, N0-2, M0 rectal cancer located within 12 cm of the anal verge who do not require abdominoperineal resection will be recruited.

Interventions: Patients will be randomly allocated to undergo either TaTME or robotic TME.

Outcome measures: Primary outcome: composite pathologic endpoint (complete TME, clear circumferential and distal resection margins). Secondary outcomes: conversion rate, postoperative recovery, morbidity, health-related quality of life, urosexual function, and costs.

Hypothesis: Results of the present study can provide evidence-based clarification of the efficacy and safety of TaTME for patients with mid and low rectal cancer. The results of this proposed project may have a significant impact on the future treatment strategy for mid and low rectal cancer.

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Achieving a composite pathologic endpoint or a successful resection is defined as meeting all the following criteria: (1) complete total mesorectal excision, (2) clear circumferential resection margin (\>1 mm), and (3) clear distal resection margin (\> 1mm).

Conversion is defined as an abdominal incision larger than necessary for specimen retrieval for the abdominal phase of transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) and robotic TME; for the transanal phase of transanal TME conversion is defined as failure to complete a 'down-to-up' TME transanally, and the majority of the TME has to be completed using the abdominal approach.

From 0 which implies no pain at all, to 100 which implies the worst pain imaginable, on the first 3 postoperative days.

Surgical complications are classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

IPSS is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the patient to choose one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic).

IIEF-5 is an abridged five-item version of the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) which is used to diagnose the presence and severity of erectile dysfunction. This questionnaire consists of only five questions and each IIEF-5 item is scored on a five-point ordinal scale where lower values represent poorer sexual function. Thus, a response of 0 for a question is considered the least functional, whereas a response of 5 is considered the most functional. The possible scores for the IIEF-5 range from 1 to 25 (one question has scores of 1-5), and a score above 21 is considered as normal erectile function and at or below this cutoff, erectile dysfunction.

The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score or Wexner's Score is the most common score used to determine the severity of incontinence before and after surgery for anal incontinence. The scoring system takes into account the type and frequency of incontinence, and the extent to which it alters the patient's life. It consists of five questions to assess the degree of incontinence (solid, liquid, gas, wears pad, lifestyle alteration). The frequency of each type of incontinence is rated on a scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always or to once a day) so that the sum of the frequencies add up to a total score that may range from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate higher levels of incontinence.

The Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. It consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a generic questionnaire for assessment of quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients. It includes 30 items, 24 of which are combined to form a global QoL scale, five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), and three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain). The other six single items evaluate dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. All questionnaires responses and scores will be linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score on the global QoL and functional scales represents a higher level of QoL and functioning, whereas a higher score on the symptom scales/items represents a higher degree of symptoms or dysfunction.

EORTC QLQ-CR38 is a specific questionnaire module specifically designed for assessment of quality of life (QoL) in patients with colorectal cancer. It consists of 38 items covering symptoms and side effects related to different colorectal cancer treatment modalities. The module contains four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, and future perspective) and eight symptom scales/items (micturition problems, chemotherapy side effects, gastrointestinal tract symptoms, male sexual problems, female sexual problems, defecation problems, stoma-related problems, and weight loss). All questionnaires responses and scores will be linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score on the global QoL and functional scales represents a higher level of QoL and functioning, whereas a higher score on the symptom scales/items represents a higher degree of symptoms or dysfunction.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Patient Reported Outcomes Following Cancer of the Rectum	NCT04936581	Sphincter Ani I... Rectal Cancer	Open Total Meso... Laparoscopic To... Robotic Total M... Transanal Total...	18 Years - 100 Years	University Hospital Gregorio Marañón
Patient Reported Outcomes Following Cancer of the Rectum	NCT04936581	Sphincter Ani I... Rectal Cancer	Open Total Meso... Laparoscopic To... Robotic Total M... Transanal Total...	18 Years - 100 Years	University Hospital Gregorio Marañón
Patient Reported Outcomes Following Cancer of the Rectum	NCT04936581	Sphincter Ani I... Rectal Cancer	Open Total Meso... Laparoscopic To... Robotic Total M... Transanal Total...	18 Years - 100 Years	University Hospital Gregorio Marañón
Patient Reported Outcomes Following Cancer of the Rectum	NCT04936581	Sphincter Ani I... Rectal Cancer	Open Total Meso... Laparoscopic To... Robotic Total M... Transanal Total...	18 Years - 100 Years	University Hospital Gregorio Marañón
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision	NCT04091620	Rectal Cancer	Transanal Total... Robotic Total M...	18 Years -	Chinese University of Hong Kong

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for robotic total mesorectal excision